Karl and team.....
Can you guys ask some developer to design some kind of Player vs Player feature, where a player can challenge other players to beat his or her multiplier (WIN) ..... so you guys offer the feature and the player puts up a bounty for someone to beat his win... within a specific time-frame.
Example : I win say $2000 on a 600x multiplier on a Slot.... then I put up say $500 as a bounty for someone else to beat the 600x multiplier within 3 days. (You guys can even add a fee for challengers to compete.... eg. $2 entrance fee.... (you give 50% to the player that puts up the bounty and you guys take 50%)
If someone beats the 600x multiplier within the 3 days.... you guys forward the $500 reward to that player..... and you give the 50% of the fees to the person that offered the challenge. (The fees are the incentive for people to do this)
{If it is not won... the reward goes back to the player that created the challenge... to decide if he or she wants to extend it ..or redirect it to his or her balance}
What do you think..... will this P2P challenges increase wagering and make things more interesting?Sorry, the question wasn't addressed to me, but I just wanted to share my personal opinion here.
Seeing how amazing some slots are, I believe slot developers and site designers are very smart people, and if P2P challenges like you described were potentially bringing more profit to the site, or were making things more interesting for users, they would have implemented that already. I mean, it's very difficult to make them even better.
Like this slot,
Bitcasino Billion, for instance. When I thought it couldn't be more entertaining, they added this feature(temporarily):
I just tried it and it works! You can claim 7% of your winnings during those 7 minutes right away when time is up.
the competition in the standings is really tight 
the winners of the contest on the forum are the ones who post the predictions on the last day so maybe that's a good idea 
