Topic: Bitcasino.io - LIES, LIES & LIES * Uncensored thread - page 5. (Read 26091 times)

You literally quoted that section of my post. Plus, are you suggesting that there are any countries in the world where a company cannot deny service to country by their own choice?

Because you said that I don't know the country which they operate, so I wouldn't be aware of the laws. What laws? Where is it illegal to deny service to a specific country?

Asking based on what laws of which country is not questioning your statement!

If you know that someone has the right to do something, then you need to know the applicable jurisdiction and the applicable law!

"Based on what laws of which country?"

You went out of your way to quote a sentence I wrote, and ask that towards it. That's questioning it.

You know, before you began to call my posts "mentally ill nonsense"

Please bold where I question the legality of casino's 'banning' certain countries, because I can not see it?

Here:

Where?

You questioned the legality of casino's 'banning' certain countries.

It's just somewhat convenient how you question legality with casinos you aren't promoting, yet defend casinos you do promote / have affiliate links to.

_{http://archive.is/UP4ep}

Sure,

https://game-protect.com/curacao-license-scam/

See "Rachel Harding"'s comments on January 7, 2018 at 1:05. She suggested that "gametech" had given her the following response: "...In November of 2014 your government passed a law obligating all off shore online casinos, even those not located at all in the UK, to acquire a UK license if they wish to serve UK players...."

You then responded with the following "Gametech offers its service illegal to UK residents, because they have not the required UK license!" (see screenshot below).

Essentially, what you are suggesting is that Gametech should not be offering their services to UK residents. But how would they be able to limit UK access if you are against companies denying access (and thinking it's against the law). In one post you're saying that they should be limiting access to the UK, or they are against UK law. But in another you just suggested that casinos don't have the right to deny access to any one country... maybe you should get on one page...

Sources:
https://game-protect.com/curacao-license-scam/
http://archive.is/PeHXt
https://i.imgur.com/s9bHh0K.png

What happened to the police showing up at their offices, and players losing the BTC in their Bitcasino wallets?   

Please quote my comments where I said that casinos shouldn't be permitting users from banned countries?

Did you deposit using an US IP address?

As you can see above, I asked how the publicly proven Bitcasino scam enforces country restrictions while they offer anonymous accounts?

If you did not use a VPN, it looks like they accept deposits from all countries and then later steal your deposits and winnings if you are from one of the "restricted" countries!

Oh, and if you lost from one of the restricted countries, then everything is fine! I at least never heard that they gave losses back after detecting that you played from a restricted country!

Thank you! Companies deny service to countries/markets all the time. His claim is weak.

Like seriously, I'm from Canada. If I were game-protect, I'd be mad that Pandora Music doesn't serve the Canadian market...

Companies don't access country markets for various reasons all the time (sometimes political, regulation, red tape, etc)


@game-protect: The country for which SportsBet.IO operates, which I can assume is Curaçao. I'm not aware of Curaçao specific laws, but the only laws which would remotely satisfy your claim (and remote at that) that it MAY be not compliant, would be to compare this to anti-discrimination laws. But denying a country citizens access for various reasons would not be considered discriminatory.

Let's face it. You have made comments in the past saying that casinos shouldn't be permitting users from banned countries, but then you question casino's when they do ban certain countries. You just seem like the type of person who is never happy.

P.S: I need to start a count for every time you use the word "mentally ill". I've given up on trying to dissuade you from using those words. It's just shameful.

Please, as micromen requested, name 1 country where it is illegal (civilly or criminally) to not serve a countries market by choice, and prohibit users from those countries from joining. I'll wait...


Upon adding your funds, did you make any bets? If you haven't contacted support, I'd do that & explain the situation. See what they say.

Can you first find one where it is illegal to, and quote that law?
You don't have to prove what you're doing is legal if there are no laws provided proving that it is, or might be illegal.

They will be held liable on a legal basis and not because they deny customers from the US, UK and Australia!

I have an idea why they deny players from Australia, but I want to hear it from their blatant lying mouth directly!


Based on what laws of which country?

You mentally ill nonsense shit poster even do not know where their office is and therefore can not know those laws!

No wait, in your separate fantasy dream world you of course know them!

"Again, Game Protect offering to play with consumer protection service at certain casinos is not anyhow related to my questions 1) and 2)"

Yes, in fact, it is. Because you're trying to hold a casino accountable for questions that you don't ask to casinos you are financially incentivized to promote.

That's bias mate.

Plus, they have the right to deny supporting any countries they wish (for any reasons they see fit).

You have continuously shown that your "thinking" method is not anyhow connected to the real word within Game Protect acts. Please save us from your "thinkings" and limit your statements to facts.


What feature do I question?

I want to know

1) why bitcasino is not supporting UK and Australia, even though their fake licensor Curacao eGaming allows serving these countries?

2) how do they enforce these country restrictions while having anonymous accounts?


Again, Game Protect offering to play with consumer protection service at certain casinos is not anyhow related to my questions 1) and 2)

I think it's pretty self explanatory what I'm saying.

Fine, let's say you're not bashing them...

Why are you questioning 1 casino for a feature, but then praising+promoting another casino for using that same feature?

Yes, you always spin questions and answers! Sun is moon, war is peace and ask a question is bashing.


So in your separate fantasy dream world asking a question is bashing?

I bash bitcasino for what feature and how?


I am not connected to your separate fantasy dream world and therefore can not assess what is hypocritical there and what not!

Can you make a list from your separate fantasy dream world, so the community possibly is able to understand what you are saying?

Spinning the question again. What I'm saying is, your bashing bitcasino for that feature YET the same casinos you promote have that feature; and you have marketed that as a "plus" in past posts.

https://game-protect.com/nitrogensports-details/
https://i.imgur.com/b1ZQUeg.png

(_{http://archive.is/umWi7})

That's highly hypocritical don't you think?

Really? Where did you answer why bitcasino.io is not accepting players from US, UK and Australia and how they enforce it while having anonymous accounts?


How is Game Protect offering to play with consumer protection anyhow related to the question why bitcasino.io is not accepting players from US, UK and Australia and how they enforce it while having anonymous accounts?