Bitcoin will be an acceptable currency. But first, there are two important issues. First, the Bitcoin transaction speed needs to be improved. It is not practical to make payments quickly. The second is a legal arrangement. In other words, countries should regulate their crypto-money business in a way that is lawful. If these two issues are completed, we can often use crypto coins in the future.
. Yes, I completely agree with your opinion on this topic. After improving these two things we can use bitcoin as way of payment method 
Topic: Bitcoin Acceptance. - page 17. (Read 2400 times)
I think it's not possible with bitcoin that has been decentralized, even I don't understand the reason for accepting that requirement. What I know is that bitcoin cannot be controlled or controlled by anyone.
That will never be possible because bitcoin is design to be decentralized in nature and at that there can never be any form of regulations that will work in the network, but if you talk about acceptability bitcoin will be accepted no matter what it may be gradually but we will still get there.
For nowadays, acceptance of bitcoin is likely to decrease. But if we as people who know about this bitcoin pose a bit about Bitcoin to the unemployed or less income , this may increases bitcoin acceptance in that country. We can spread it through social sites like Facebook by using the verses that can attract other people to try getting the free money in Bitcoin.
If bitcoin were to be accepted, on the condition that it should be regulated. Do you think it should be done, disregarding its decentralized nature?
I think the acceptance of bitcoin is good. Because of this we accept bitcoin wholeheartedly because we see that it will bring about our country and also help our poor people to get their lives in the future too. we should only accept bitcoin.
At the present time, we can see that most countries around the world have accepted bitcoins circulating in their countries. The approval of Bitcoins also makes them have a better path and their value. Increasingly compared to human needs. Although the number of bits in the world is limited to 21 million coin, their value is really high.
I think bitcoin is a trend because of its decentralized nature. if bitcoin loses decentralization, the demand will be reduced
The adoption of bitcoin as a buffer against bitcoin has become a global currency. Today's countries have been legally bitcoin, bringing electronic transactions into widespread use.
which I know to date, accepted or not bitcoin, has not been a barrier to its growth to date.
Putting aside it's own decentralization for the sake of acceptance may lead to a result of a huge lost, we see in everyday bitcoiners lives that using a bitcoin become widely popular for not goer person like me, but if we blend it to the society disregarding the importance that it should be only use wisely not adopted by everyone you know.
I think Bitcoin will be acceptable and be legitimate in the future. And it will be adjusted accordingly to put more active use.
Bitcoin was already a legal currency that all people can accept it or any stablishment and businesses but in some condition their government should accept it first also they need to set up their own wallet that may recieved bitcoin but in an individual we can only used online wallet to used bitcoin.
Bitcoin has received a lot, the existence of bitcoin really helps the community, don't get me wrong.
The bitcoin community is starting to develop well, so I think this is widespread, it's just that those who haven't or are less sensitive to the existence of bitcoins who can't accept bitcoin.
The bitcoin community is starting to develop well, so I think this is widespread, it's just that those who haven't or are less sensitive to the existence of bitcoins who can't accept bitcoin.
There is a problem. You want Bitcoin growth and acceptance by a large number of people. To do this, you need to go for Bitcoin without problems, quickly buy bread. But entrepreneurs do not want to work with a volatile currency. For business it is good when the currency is stable.
Perhaps now Bitcoin is stabilizing and will show slow growth. This is the best scenario for adoption.
Perhaps now Bitcoin is stabilizing and will show slow growth. This is the best scenario for adoption.
why are people obsessed about regulation.
for some reason some people tend to think in black and white when it comes to bitcoin!
they say it is either be regulated or die. or not be regulated or die! in case of OP he thinks decentralization will go away if regulations come! which has nothing to do with each other.
it is like the bitcoin and banks thing all over again. where for years these people said bitcoin will either die or replace banks. they never said bitcoin grows while banks still exist...
I don't think that needs to be regulated if it eliminates the decentralization that bitcoin has, and I think it's also difficult and won't work, because bitcoin doesn't need it all.
In my opinion, there is no need for btc to be regulated as this has been proven to be successful to it's purpose and function of being a decentralized currency. With or without the government support of some governments globally, btc has manage to more independent and work efficiently as a payment system and a digital currency for investment. All it needs is mass adaptation wherein the more people supporting btc, the market growth could be substantial and more investors will be coming in thus resulting to a marginal profit.
If bitcoin were to be accepted, on the condition that it should be regulated. Do you think it should be done, disregarding its decentralized nature?
Accepted by who?
There are clearly people who think bitcoin will be accepted by governments
around the world as their currency. Its dilusional to think this
The question has to be asked, how can bitcoin become centralised?
Regulatory bodies would surely press these regulations on bitcoin no matter what. It's needed for widespread adoption knowing that most businesses and establishments are in compliance with their local SEC and department of trades. If they are to not impose regulations on cryptocurrencies and people began accepting it, how can the government apprehend wrong-doers and fraudsters if they have no grounds to do so? It'll be easy for scammers to scam knowing that there are no regulations that they should be afraid of.
If bitcoin were to be accepted, on the condition that it should be regulated. Do you think it should be done, disregarding its decentralized nature?
Disregarding it's a Decentralized nature, I think it's should be accepted this should be done by big companies and organisations at large which I turn we know it has a future to stay and we need to understand the potential benefits and risk it involves.
Jump to: