In my country, there's no housing crisis because the population has been decreasing for a few decades, so expecting even a house or a flat to rise in price (above inflation rate) isn't very realistic, let alone just a piece of land that doesn't have anything on it. Okay, looking at some data, it does seem that there's some growth in price (10% over a year, it seems), but the land market is very new in my country (it has existed for less than 2 years), and there's no completely reliable and trustworthy data.
Another thing is that my country's at war with another country, so the land you buy might get occupied by a foreign power or might be destroyed by military equipment and weapons. That also makes Bitcoin a lot more attractive, as it is digital.
Sorry about your country's circumstances
Hope for some element of peace and my condolence to the lost souls.
Just as i thought, there are places where land isn't as attractive as mine due to certain risk.
Example is natural disaster prone areas like earth quake or floods not neglecting war.
There's always an element of risk in every investment
The bigger the risk
The bigger the reward
In your country when there comes peace as times goes on people will migrate and development would be administered this would require the use of land
Which would appreciate its value more than mine.
The price of land can reduce like bitcoin due to certain factors but it's usefulness would increase the price later on.
War is not something any wise human would want to see or experience.
Lives getting lost
Anxieties
Prices of goods rising
Sigh, i hope it all gets better soon.
I am from India and being in a country that has the biggest population in the world I can relate to your topic. What I do not understand is your comparison of land with Bitcoin the reason being land is physical and Bitcoin is virtual. Buying land has more obligations than buying Bitcoin as you would need to go through multiple paperwork. The next issue is that the land is governed by the government ruling that land whereas Bitcoin is decentralized. Comparing Bitcoin with land based on its price does not fit as Bitcoin has many more positive aspects than a piece of land. While I agree that both the price of land and Bitcoin are unstoppable, understand this Bitcoin is responsible for everyone being aware of an ecosystem that is decentralized while land is a centralized entity and its price is controlled by the government.
The comparison was mainly based on scarcity and limited supply.
They both different in lots of ways doesn't separate them as been opportunities
One is already growing (land), the other still at the infant stage(Bitcoin).
The essence is if one can't afford land, its better to buy some amount of Bitcoin and learn to Hold rather than been manipulated by the market.