Topic: Bitcoin as a Form of Anarchy - page 4. (Read 875 times)
I dont think it's gonna work. Bitcoin is not private and not fast enough to change fiat money. Other crypto could, but they not popular.
Anarchy? I wouldn't completely say that bitcoin did cause or will cause anarchy in the economic system and I don't think that this is Satoshi's goal.
How can it cause anarchy when it wasn't yet adopted globally? It is deem as as store of value and investment instrument. We have gold as the top store of value and then a lot of assets out there that is also an investments and no one question them as anarchist or something.
Still they can question that bitcoin doesn't have central authority, can easily be manipulated because there is no regulation and such. But still, I don't think that it will cause chaos and anarchy in the financial world.
How can it cause anarchy when it wasn't yet adopted globally? It is deem as as store of value and investment instrument. We have gold as the top store of value and then a lot of assets out there that is also an investments and no one question them as anarchist or something.
Still they can question that bitcoin doesn't have central authority, can easily be manipulated because there is no regulation and such. But still, I don't think that it will cause chaos and anarchy in the financial world.
Bitcoin is a form of anarchy in the economic system. The Bitcoin system is designed to do self-rule and be supported by the application of technological advancements so that it looks amazing for mathematicians and technologists. However, according to the anarchism that has been successfully implemented in Spain, everyone must do the task according to their respective roles so that this concept can succeed.
Expecting Bitcoin to be successful is the same as expecting an anarchist social order to be realized. It seems impossible, but in fact, the social order of anarchy can be done with satisfactory results. The anarchic social order that occurred in the Spanish Revolution which lasted for more than two years before General Franco's invasion succeeded in conquering an area controlled by anarchists.
social anarchy which was also supported by economic anarchy in Spain was carried out extremely. One of them, the community supporting anarchism in Spain at that time burned government money. As a result, coupons (and even just trust) can be used to get fruit and vegetables. If you support Bitcoin to succeed only so that you can then get a lot of Dollars, you only pollute the brilliant concept of Bitcoin anarchy.
Anarchy is an anti-government social order and rejects the state system. My question is, do you think Bitcoin doesn't need regulation from the government or the state? and also does Bitcoin not require government support?Expecting Bitcoin to be successful is the same as expecting an anarchist social order to be realized. It seems impossible, but in fact, the social order of anarchy can be done with satisfactory results. The anarchic social order that occurred in the Spanish Revolution which lasted for more than two years before General Franco's invasion succeeded in conquering an area controlled by anarchists.
social anarchy which was also supported by economic anarchy in Spain was carried out extremely. One of them, the community supporting anarchism in Spain at that time burned government money. As a result, coupons (and even just trust) can be used to get fruit and vegetables. If you support Bitcoin to succeed only so that you can then get a lot of Dollars, you only pollute the brilliant concept of Bitcoin anarchy.
Now there are more than one definition of Anarchy. What you have mentioned is one which doesn't really go with bitcoin whatsoever and look below for the second one,
"Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal"
This definition is partly true for bitcoin but not completely! Also I believe, government regulation is necessary for the growth of bitcoin! Without government support, mass adoption is not possible! But I literally find no similarities of bitcoin with anarchy so we are not polluting anything! We all have to live within a system and we want the system to adopt bitcoin! It makes no sense in going out of the system and adopt it!
Political anarchy can have many forms, there are dozens of school of anarchism like anarcho-capitalism, anarcho-communism, individualist anarchism, green anarchism and so on. They are all very different from each other, so we can't expect that Bitcoin is similar to them all. Additionally, Bitcoin is not a country, so it's not fully correct to compare it with political systems.
And Bitcoin is not purely egalitarian - developers hold more power than an average user, whales hold more power than an average user, miners hold more power than an average user. The strengths of users is in numbers, they create demand for Bitcoin and all other groups have to listen to them. If Bitcoin can be compared to anarchism, it's most closely resembles market anarchism.
And Bitcoin is not purely egalitarian - developers hold more power than an average user, whales hold more power than an average user, miners hold more power than an average user. The strengths of users is in numbers, they create demand for Bitcoin and all other groups have to listen to them. If Bitcoin can be compared to anarchism, it's most closely resembles market anarchism.
Its true, anarchy rejects the authority so bitcoin rejects the economic authority so we can use anarchy for bitcoin.my answer is no, bitcoin doesnt need a government support, its based on this.
Bitcoin is a form of anarchy in the economic system. The Bitcoin system is designed to do self-rule and be supported by the application of technological advancements so that it looks amazing for mathematicians and technologists. However, according to the anarchism that has been successfully implemented in Spain, everyone must do the task according to their respective roles so that this concept can succeed.
Expecting Bitcoin to be successful is the same as expecting an anarchist social order to be realized. It seems impossible, but in fact, the social order of anarchy can be done with satisfactory results. The anarchic social order that occurred in the Spanish Revolution which lasted for more than two years before General Franco's invasion succeeded in conquering an area controlled by anarchists.
social anarchy which was also supported by economic anarchy in Spain was carried out extremely. One of them, the community supporting anarchism in Spain at that time burned government money. As a result, coupons (and even just trust) can be used to get fruit and vegetables. If you support Bitcoin to succeed only so that you can then get a lot of Dollars, you only pollute the brilliant concept of Bitcoin anarchy.
Anarchy is an anti-government social order and rejects the state system. My question is, do you think Bitcoin doesn't need regulation from the government or the state? and also does Bitcoin not require government support? Expecting Bitcoin to be successful is the same as expecting an anarchist social order to be realized. It seems impossible, but in fact, the social order of anarchy can be done with satisfactory results. The anarchic social order that occurred in the Spanish Revolution which lasted for more than two years before General Franco's invasion succeeded in conquering an area controlled by anarchists.
social anarchy which was also supported by economic anarchy in Spain was carried out extremely. One of them, the community supporting anarchism in Spain at that time burned government money. As a result, coupons (and even just trust) can be used to get fruit and vegetables. If you support Bitcoin to succeed only so that you can then get a lot of Dollars, you only pollute the brilliant concept of Bitcoin anarchy.
Bitcoin is a form of anarchy in the economic system. The Bitcoin system is designed to do self-rule and be supported by the application of technological advancements so that it looks amazing for mathematicians and technologists. However, according to the anarchism that has been successfully implemented in Spain, everyone must do the task according to their respective roles so that this concept can succeed.
Expecting Bitcoin to be successful is the same as expecting an anarchist social order to be realized. It seems impossible, but in fact, the social order of anarchy can be done with satisfactory results. The anarchic social order that occurred in the Spanish Revolution which lasted for more than two years before General Franco's invasion succeeded in conquering an area controlled by anarchists.
social anarchy which was also supported by economic anarchy in Spain was carried out extremely. One of them, the community supporting anarchism in Spain at that time burned government money. As a result, coupons (and even just trust) can be used to get fruit and vegetables. If you support Bitcoin to succeed only so that you can then get a lot of Dollars, you only pollute the brilliant concept of Bitcoin anarchy.
Expecting Bitcoin to be successful is the same as expecting an anarchist social order to be realized. It seems impossible, but in fact, the social order of anarchy can be done with satisfactory results. The anarchic social order that occurred in the Spanish Revolution which lasted for more than two years before General Franco's invasion succeeded in conquering an area controlled by anarchists.
social anarchy which was also supported by economic anarchy in Spain was carried out extremely. One of them, the community supporting anarchism in Spain at that time burned government money. As a result, coupons (and even just trust) can be used to get fruit and vegetables. If you support Bitcoin to succeed only so that you can then get a lot of Dollars, you only pollute the brilliant concept of Bitcoin anarchy.
Jump to: