https://blockchain.info/address/12pCPrWvudnefJCtXQUBcm9z2NogtC3Rix
Bitcoins on the move. Seems like its only one winner.
So they got 50,000.353 BTC.
And 0.05 got sent to someone else.
No fee.
Topic: Bitcoin Auction Results Thread! - page 2. (Read 5019 times)
Yup, please post in this thread if you find any news.
so far just fud
normally someone steps out and reveals if they have bought as part of group or whatever
http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2015/dpr-february-auction/
so, there is still half a day for wire funds to be sent, so until it is wrapped up, usms won't reveal anyway, and the buyer/s 'may' reveal later on in coming days, maybe not. probably not
it is only people like barry silbert or tim draper that do
we shall see
normally someone steps out and reveals if they have bought as part of group or whatever
http://www.usmarshals.gov/assets/2015/dpr-february-auction/
Quote
Cash. The bid must be an all cash offer. Bids that are contingent on financing terms of any kind will not be considered. All bids must be made in U.S. dollars.
Receipt of Funds. The winning bidder should be prepared to wire purchase funds to the USMS by 2:00 P.M. EST on Monday, March 09, 2015. If the winning bidder does not provide the USMS with a copy of the wire transmittal receipt by this date, the bidder will be disqualified and another winning bidder will be selected. FAILURE TO INITIATE A WIRE TRANSFER AND PROVIDE THE USMS WITH A COPY OF THE WIRE TRANSMITTAL RECEIPT BY MONDAY, MARCH 09, 2015, AT 2:00 P.M. EST WILL RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF THE BIDDER’S DEPOSIT. The winning bidder is responsible for any wire transfer fees associated with his or her payment..
Receipt of Funds. The winning bidder should be prepared to wire purchase funds to the USMS by 2:00 P.M. EST on Monday, March 09, 2015. If the winning bidder does not provide the USMS with a copy of the wire transmittal receipt by this date, the bidder will be disqualified and another winning bidder will be selected. FAILURE TO INITIATE A WIRE TRANSFER AND PROVIDE THE USMS WITH A COPY OF THE WIRE TRANSMITTAL RECEIPT BY MONDAY, MARCH 09, 2015, AT 2:00 P.M. EST WILL RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF THE BIDDER’S DEPOSIT. The winning bidder is responsible for any wire transfer fees associated with his or her payment..
so, there is still half a day for wire funds to be sent, so until it is wrapped up, usms won't reveal anyway, and the buyer/s 'may' reveal later on in coming days, maybe not. probably not
it is only people like barry silbert or tim draper that do
we shall see
Is demand strong enough to absorb this quantity over a short period of time? How will the price be affected?
I think its consensus that the coins won't be dumped on the open market and that you don't need to worry about the market absorbing the cons.
Is demand strong enough to absorb this quantity over a short period of time? How will the price be affected?
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
Certain buyers might want to lock in at a particular price or rather buying at a predetermined spot price. If by going to the open market, generally you don't have the luxury getting such large amount at the same price even if you spread your buying order going to different exchangers. That is because price will start to rise as the market cannot cope with such huge demand at any particular time, and it will push the price upwards. Essentially what it means is that you will be buying at higher price.
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
When the price at which bitcoins were sold in the first auction is still unknown, why are we talking about the price in the third auction? 
Can we just cut the crap and close this thread ...
Some muppet on twitter claimed knowledge of bids 30% over mkt prior to bidders being advised
... credibility zero
Bears talking shit about another crash after auction based on nothing
BTC will do what its gonna do ...
/thread
Some muppet on twitter claimed knowledge of bids 30% over mkt prior to bidders being advised
... credibility zeroBears talking shit about another crash after auction based on nothing
BTC will do what its gonna do ...
/thread
there are always bag holders and losers like you to buy those "cheap coins" to lose money.
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
Yeah, like it is purely visible from 220 to 275 that we are loosing money, and we seem to lose more money tonight, right? Keeping your screen upsidedown much?
There is undeniable buying pressure, a horde of "greater idiots" if u will, and were packed and ready to roll, and dumping ..well..we will dump when u finally decide to buy, and be ultimate trolls :]
cheers
Sure, get ready for the incoming next $97 to $120 to $60 pump and dump scheme
*opens popcorn*
You really shouldnt trade if this is honestly your opinion, just sell all btc and go do something u understand.
Bitcoin price will never be under 100$ again, people are dumb, but not that dumb to let a chance like that pass by them.
cheers
there are always bag holders and losers like you to buy those "cheap coins" to lose money.
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
Yeah, like it is purely visible from 220 to 275 that we are loosing money, and we seem to lose more money tonight, right? Keeping your screen upsidedown much?
There is undeniable buying pressure, a horde of "greater idiots" if u will, and were packed and ready to roll, and dumping ..well..we will dump when u finally decide to buy, and be ultimate trolls :]
cheers
Sure, get ready for the incoming next $97 to $120 to $60 pump and dump scheme
there are always bag holders and losers like you to buy those "cheap coins" to lose money.
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
Yeah, like it is purely visible from 220 to 275 that we are loosing money, and we seem to lose more money tonight, right? Keeping your screen upsidedown much?
There is undeniable buying pressure, a horde of "greater idiots" if u will, and were packed and ready to roll, and dumping ..well..we will dump when u finally decide to buy, and be ultimate trolls :]
cheers
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
If you are a investor in need of 50.000 btc it will be very hard to buy it from the market or otc.
The main problems are slippage and risks regarding counterparty.
Both of it and more doesnt apply here
no one needs 50,000 BTC, that's why you troll this shit since $6xx but no one bought those 1000k+ " $
Then just sell and forget bitcoin.
But i know u cant. Your addiction and believe in bitcoin is so big that you even have to make atleast 1 new account per day on this forum
Who are all this people selling their bitcoin to if nobody buys?
there are always bag holders and losers like you to buy those "cheap coins" to lose money.
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
If you are a investor in need of 50.000 btc it will be very hard to buy it from the market or otc.
The main problems are slippage and risks regarding counterparty.
Both of it and more doesnt apply here
no one needs 50,000 BTC, that's why you troll this shit since $6xx but no one bought those 1000k+ " $
Then just sell and forget bitcoin.
But i know u cant. Your addiction and believe in bitcoin is so big that you even have to make atleast 1 new account per day on this forum
Who are all this people selling their bitcoin to if nobody buys?
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
If you are a investor in need of 50.000 btc it will be very hard to buy it from the market or otc.
The main problems are slippage and risks regarding counterparty.
Both of it and more doesnt apply here
no one needs 50,000 BTC, that's why you troll this shit since $6xx but no one bought those 1000k+ " $
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/19512/us-marshals-auction-participant-price-not-significantly-market/
Quote
According to Kardashev Capital, whose bid of $221.51 per bitcoin was approximately 17 percent under the market value of the coins as of the close of bidding on Thursday, it did not win any lots.
“While we’re disappointed to learn that we weren’t a winning bidder, I’m glad to hear that the bitcoins sold closer to or even above market price,” said Kardashev Capital partner Greg Gum.
“While we’re disappointed to learn that we weren’t a winning bidder, I’m glad to hear that the bitcoins sold closer to or even above market price,” said Kardashev Capital partner Greg Gum.
That's pretty impressive if true. Not much room left on the downside for now.
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
If you are a investor in need of 50.000 btc it will be very hard to buy it from the market or otc.
The main problems are slippage and risks regarding counterparty.
Both of it and more doesnt apply here
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
it usually sells at a price higher than market price.....
Forgive me for being such a noob but why are the coins sold above the market price when those bidders could buy the same quantity of coins in market price? I mean, isn't this such an insane move or am I missing something about their logic?
it usually sells at a price higher than market price.....
Im suggesting it sells at around 30% higher, they know they can make a shit ton in the long term and intelligent whales don't want to miss this opportunity.people who were buying those coins are billionaires and can probably wait a little before they start selling those coins but they eventually will, just question which concerns us is when and how fast
But unfortunately, we cannot predict because we don't know how much more was the price of the auctioned coins compared to the price of the coins in the market. If only we know how much it was, we can predict when will they probably sell those coins and when will the auctioned coins really take into effect in the market.
Jump to: