But be careful with the narrative debating that "it's not an attack", because Ordinals could be used as an attack that could hide itself behind Bitcoin's very ethos of permissionlessness and censorship-resistance.
I get that it can be annoying to pay the miner an extra dollar, but how exactly can it attack the principles of Bitcoin?
you two fools are both forum-sisters pretending to fight but just trying to distract from the real conversation. your shitty buzzwords pretending bitcoin shouldnt have rules is where you both fail. bitcoin only works due to rules.
the relaxation/removal and softening of rules is whats causing the problem. devs caused that.
asics do not program the bitcoin network. nor do asics choose the transactions. nor do asics choose the fee's so just stop with the "miner to blame" stuff.. its not logical
so you not realise your about 12 years out of date of blaming solo miners..
you want to pretend its user error or miner fault. but its not. its devs that created an exploit which is causing this nonsense useless bloat
bitcoin was invented WITH STRICT RULES.
every byte had a purpose and a validycheck rule for its utility.. over time those rules have been removed, relaxed , softened
your forum wife is the ultimate idiot feeding you both stupid narratives to social drama over to deflect from the real cause. and you both foolishly just follow his scripts like idiots.
bitcoins rules have been relaxed which is bad. grow up realise it and care more about bitcoin and less about kissing dev ass.. devs come and go so defending a dev while promoting the breaking of bitcoin rules is not a good trait. but heck you both are not bitcoiners you both love other networks. so i dont see you actually caring any time soon about the future of bitcoin. as long as you both continue hoping to recruit people over to your other prefered systems.
it is funny how 6 years ago your clan said that rejecting blocks was not censorship (mandatory segwit flagging)
it is funny how 6 years ago your clan said that excess transactions without meme/json bloat was an attack..
but now you are saying the opposite. you dont want blocks rejected for X. and you think spam of junk memes/json meaningless data is not an attack
the only time you pretend its meaningless data is when you see you fanbase move away from kissing your ass so you have to change your narrative to recruit people back..
you both cant even pick a narrative and stick with it. you just both follow whatever script was spoonfed to you.