Topic: "Bitcoin classic", brought up by literal crooks - page 2. (Read 2708 times)

This'll never end while there's unrest. If the original team want to keep the peace then they need some ideas that satisfy most people. Evidently they are not supplying them right now.

Rubbish its not about code its about taking control of Bitcoin. The change was minimal irrelevant in effect, change whos only purpose is to be different then core to get people to use different client. Coinbase said that it wants Bitcoin run by different team led by Gavin.

The people behind the fork don't matter at all, just like who satoshi is doesn't matter either.

The people behind the fork don't matter at all, just like who satoshi is doesn't matter either. The code will speak for itself as a simple 2mb patch, once the network is forked and core is forced to adapt or die(they'll likely adapt by merging the 2mb patch), people can feel free to move back to core or another implementation.

What a ridiculous smear campaign that has absolutely nothing to do with anything important to the issue at hand. How low will you people go?

This is a false comparison and thus a fallacy. If you're going to be comparing side that you should be comparing Wladimir to the brothers

Good thing Core has sane, reasonable folks like Luke Jr. to learn us all some religion. Innit?

 

There may be more development in secret. Rather than having public activity on github they seem to have mostly done code dumps with their initial patches. It certainly seems more dead than even XT did.

Classic has been losing reliability and credibility, as to my knowledge, the development has been quite stagnant

Well this is quite interesting and entertaining at the same time. Although you will have 'Classic supporters' coming over to this thread trying to rescue the Toomin brothers and the project even though it has been losing credibility time after time. It would be quite unfortunate if they'd be people behind the main implementation (although ignorant people are going to argue that it doesn't matter).

That's nice.  I want to be able to fly and shoot laser beams out off my ass, but without any painful/expensive surgery or magical compacts with eldrich entities best left unnamed.

You go to war against the socioeconomic majority with the misinformed, low-information, emotionally manipulated, fear-mongering Toominista lynch mob you have, not the idealized Army of Heaven you want.  Good luck beating the Knights of Satoshi with such a mass of surly, gormless Reddit dregs.   

Do you have any plans to reevaluate your assumption that Bitcoin is a democracy, in light of XT, Unlimited, and Classic's ignoble failures?

i want a 2mb implementation but without any other dodgy code or hidden agenda. that goes both for bankers/fraudsters and the narrow minded blockstream roadmap, who both could enforce dodgy code.

so lets throw classic to the curb just like xt and concentrate on getting a clean implementation with 2mb blocks like the majority of the community want.

Good thing Core has sane, reasonable folks like Luke Jr. to learn us all some religion. Innit?

 

Well this is quite interesting and entertaining at the same time. Although you will have 'Classic supporters' coming over to this thread trying to rescue the Toomin brothers and the project even though it has been losing credibility time after time. It would be quite unfortunate if they'd be people behind the main implementation (although ignorant people are going to argue that it doesn't matter).

im a 2mb supporter. not a toomin/r3/gavincoin/hearncoin supporter. and i have wanted a bigger block since even before classic or toomin or XT were even a thing. people like lauda think anyone that doesnt want segwit who wants a simple 2mb implementation instead must be a toomin/r3/gavincoin supporter

quite the opposite. i want a 2mb implementation but without any other dodgy code or hidden agenda. that goes both for bankers/fraudsters and the narrow minded blockstream roadmap, who both could enforce dodgy code.

so lets throw classic to the curb just like xt and concentrate on getting a clean implementation with 2mb blocks like the majority of the community want.

i think people like lauda want the bandcamp debate between bankers, fraudsters (they both the same ), vs blockstream. because its obvious blockstream would win based on social standing... but that just detracts the attention away from the community wanting 2mb and turns it into a troll debate about blockstream or STFU.

so lets kill off xt lets kill of classic. and lets find a cleaner moral and open way to get a 2mb implementation that has no social drama that the blockstream trolls can use as excuses to try propping up their control.

there needs to be 2 clean implementations
2mb - for users
1mb segwit - for users

then let the community decide which is the better way forward.. then when consensus is reached then the miners can start adopting the community favourite