My crazy idea:
for 15 seconds you show this img, and nothing else
no sound, no mention of bitcoin, Nothing! just the image.
then the img nicely fades out. end of commercial!
The idea is to make people say "?WTF?... what was that" they will for sure talk to people about it and everyone will be like "Ya i saw that too... i have no clue what it is??"
Finally a friend of a friend will be like "OH ya that's
The Bitcoin commercial, you really should go check it out online!"
the guy gose online and learns about this revolutionary idea that is bitcoin and falls in love with it!
he goes back to all his friends and tells them "I figured it out!! the weird commercial is B I T C O I N, and its going to change the world my friends. BUY BUY BUY!!! before its to late"
the most talk about commercial of 2012
Edit: ok maybe give them a clue .... have a short version of this song playing in the back:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10fOzt-HxfgLMAO!
I understand what you are getting at here and it has value as I've been thinking along the same lines all day. I think what you describe is a bit too minimalist and may come off as cheap looking though. Plus, you may be surprised at how long 15 seconds really is when you have one static image frozen on your TV.
Everyone reading this knows there is a bit of a learning curve to bitcoins and 15 seconds isn't that much time to convey its message. Once someone new to bitcoins picks up the bare essentials, in reality they are easy to use especially if more vendors pick up bitcoins. We can make this simple, however, with tight shots of a single spokesperson with no clutter in the background. I would like this much better than the God-voice narrator like in the AT&T commercials linked above. Someone speaking directly to the viewer is more personable.
I do remember those AT&T You Will commercials. It's interesting how prophetic they were as I see them again. That future is here now and it isn't quite as exciting as it was imagined in 1993.
I think a simple approach would be in order for a few good reasons.
1.) Keep production costs as low as possible while keeping quality production value.
2.) An uncluttered message.
3.) Enhance the mystery and encourage the viewer to take that leap to the website.
4.) Convey cinematically the ease of bitcoin use.
As you point out this commercial would need to have a strong hook that will encourage the viewer to either scan a QR Code on their screen or else browse to weusecoins.com. To do this I think we follow the strategy the creator(s) of the bitcoin employed in order to catch our attention. Whether it was purposeful or not, they created an enigmatic character as the inventor who is no longer around. I know this is one of the elements of the bitcoin that reeled me in as everyone loves a good story. I say we go 180% from the AT&T commercials; simple visuals with clean and professional graphics but we tell an interesting story. So here is what I've been thinking:
Tight shots on a single spokesperson with a simple, uncluttered background. We will want to have a QR Code up somewhere on the screen at all times. As he begins to speak it is almost as if he starts off in mid-thought.
SPOKESPERSON: Here is what we know. In early 2009 a programmer calling himself Satoshi Nakamoto created what is now known as the Genesis Block. This set off a chain of events that was to be the beginning of the world's most successful digital currency. A currency that has no central authority or government to bureaucratize it. No failing banks to mishandle it and charge outrageous fees to move it from person to person. He called his new digital currency the Bitcoin and then... Mr. Nakamoto promptly disappeared from the scene. Here is what we don't know. When he brought the first Bitcoins into existence, did he know that he was about to change the world forever? Interested?
Then we fade with the URL and maybe some text like "Where is Satoshi Nakamoto?"
Now all this being said, we can cut a :15 and :30 for television broadcast and even a 2-3 minute version for the website without raising production costs one bit...coin.
I am open to ideas. If you guys think I'm way off base here let me know. You won't hurt my feelings as most of you have much more experience with bitcoins than I do. Ultimately this is Xenland's baby so as far as I'm concerned whatever he says goes.