This is interesting but I've enjoyed the Classic REKT threads much more
Then go pay them a visit.Very good graphics and easy to understand, one thing i dont get is this Libsecp256k1 how can we verify transactions and blocks faster? would that not mean a shorter blocktime?
They have created their own code for doing the ECDSA stuff (rather than using OpenSSL) and apparently it works a lot faster (not surprising perhaps as OpenSSL has not worked out so well as a project and some of the reasons for that are also political).I have to say that this roadmap is pretty awesome ! The messy house argument is the best that could be found about the blocksize debate 
. Who's the author of this nice picture(s) ?
It is stated at the end: "u/Cryptoconomy".. Who's the author of this nice picture(s) ?A really good visualization of core's roadmap.Thank you for that. Regardig SegWit this house organization analogy is just awesome. Simple and easy to understand.
That was the point of it; explaining in a simple yet correct way.Here it is again: Smaller Transactions > Bigger Blocks
This makes better use of the space available.
Remember, more transactions is what we want, big blocks is not the only way to achieve it. And it's also the worst way.
Correct. Scaling via the block size is very inefficient. This makes better use of the space available.
Remember, more transactions is what we want, big blocks is not the only way to achieve it. And it's also the worst way.
Indicative of the levels of cynicism and maturity (not to mention desperation) employed by the blockchain-bloaters: knight22 only really came into the thread so he could run home to bitcoin.com crying "they censored me, nasty fat hobbits with their censoring". Kind of pathetic really, I always thought the ringwraiths were supposed to be badasses 
He knew what was going to happen if he posted FUD (e.g. Bitcoin is "broken"). According to their deluded minds, 'moderation' is an abstract concept that has left the plain of existence when moment Bitcoin XT released. 
Cleaned & replied.
