Felt like I watched some pro regulation propaganda to be honest not much in the ways of arguments as to why regulation may be a bad thing.
Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.
Well made and interesting but very pro regulation. From the storyline given I thought we would see more of both sides of the coin.
I don't think it's propaganda, but any intelligent person knows for it to become a legit currency where you can actually spend it on shit there's gonna be some 'regulation' and taxation. It's not a bad thing, but like one of the interviewees said, they can't touch the actual protocol so i don't see why it really matters much.
Of course it matters though, thats like saying I dont mind having my emails read , regulated and my history stored because its still the SMTP behind it...
I don't see how they're the same. I think you need to tell me what sort of regulation you have in mind.
I dont have any regulation in mind.
You made the point that any regulation doesn't matter due to the protocol not being changed which I refuted with an example of how you don't have to change the protocol to change the way in which it is used and monitored. Lets not get into a debate on whether regulation is good or bad thing, my opinion that it promoted the idea of regulation without giving much counter argument is my opinion and still stands.
I meant what regulation you had in mind when you were arguing against it.
