Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin is becoming a black hole - page 3. (Read 6123 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
September 15, 2013, 12:14:13 PM
#21
SSD  is the secret, think about it if you change of computer or if you want keep that one
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 11:51:52 AM
#20
As u probably know, a black hole is a star with gravity that prevents light from escaping. Today I noticed a similar effect during downloading Bitcoin blockchain.  Grin
It's a star that has collapsed on itself.

Hahaha, it has reminded me "SolidCoin: Ready for BitCoin Collapse" article. That guy predicted the future!  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
September 15, 2013, 11:48:09 AM
#19
As u probably know, a black hole is a star with gravity that prevents light from escaping. Today I noticed a similar effect during downloading Bitcoin blockchain.  Grin
It's a star that has collapsed on itself.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 11:47:14 AM
#18
use electrum

I had a bad experience with Blockchain.Info API, so I don't trust services on the Internet. Local full client is the only option.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 11:45:34 AM
#17
False, the weight of a block depends on the transactions inside it. A block with 1 transactions weight only few KB. If blocks now are mined faster then each block will contain less transactions. The problem about getting the chain is the number of transactions, not of blocks

Well, it depends on what part of a computer system is a bottleneck - bandwidth, CPU or storage. U seem to talk about bandwidth, it's not a problem in my case.
legendary
Activity: 1357
Merit: 1004
September 15, 2013, 11:38:38 AM
#16
use electrum
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
September 15, 2013, 11:34:41 AM
#15
For new people: the number of transactions is why the most recent blocks takes longer to get rather than the earlier one. Teleport an ASIC back in 2010, when blocks had 1 transaction, and their weight would be the same.

Oh, didn't notice this sentence.

For new people: Right now ASICs mine blocks 40% faster (7 min instead of 10), if u teleported an ASIC back in 2010 then we would spend 30% more time to download and validate the blockchain.
False, the weight of a block depends on the transactions inside it. A block with 1 transactions weight only few KB. If blocks now are mined faster then each block will contain less transactions. The problem about getting the chain is the number of transactions, not of blocks
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 10:45:16 AM
#14
To pre-install the blockchain is not a problem, the problem is that a computer must be powerful enough to be able to outpace freshly mined blocks (black hole effect). I see "17 weeks behind" now and curious what will see tomorrow - 16 or 18...
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
September 15, 2013, 10:27:42 AM
#13
Is there a market for laptops preinstalled with the blockchain? Something for somebody to think about. Ironically, even with the hardware in stock, it would still take at least two weeks to take delivery.

or you could anticipate and pre-load it onto the computer before they order..
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
September 15, 2013, 10:23:43 AM
#12
Is there a market for laptops preinstalled with the blockchain? Something for somebody to think about. Ironically, even with the hardware in stock, it would still take at least two weeks to take delivery.
hero member
Activity: 697
Merit: 501
September 15, 2013, 09:40:43 AM
#11
My 2008 macbook pro is also very slow to the point where I wouldn't download the block chain through the QT client again.  I would just go the torrent root.
I think mine took around 10 days or so.  Luckily re-indexing only takes 3 days.  Still long.

Anyone have an estimate with a 2013 macbook pro?  I may upgrade sometime in the next 6 months.
Peace
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 08:28:10 AM
#10
No. There is only Windows and Bitcoin on this computer. I suspect that was a bad choice to launch full client on a netbook.

What version of Windows? Maybe it's slow with Win 7, but faster with Win XP.

WinXP, Intel Atom 1 GHz, 1 GB RAM, not sure if HDD is 5400 or 7200 rpm.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 08:26:32 AM
#9
For new people: the number of transactions is why the most recent blocks takes longer to get rather than the earlier one. Teleport an ASIC back in 2010, when blocks had 1 transaction, and their weight would be the same.

Oh, didn't notice this sentence.

For new people: Right now ASICs mine blocks 40% faster (7 min instead of 10), if u teleported an ASIC back in 2010 then we would spend 30% more time to download and validate the blockchain.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1001
Bitcoin - Resistance is futile
September 15, 2013, 08:24:01 AM
#8
Quote
I believe I would outpace the generation rate but advent of ASICs made the situation worse and now I have to switch to a more powerful computer
No wonder your ignore button is orange, i understand why people put you in ignore after reading idiocies like that  Undecided

For new people: the number of transactions is why the most recent blocks takes longer to get rather than the earlier one. Teleport an ASIC back in 2010, when blocks had 1 transaction, and their weight would be the same.

Quote
Check your AV, I had problems with avast.
I have avast and i have no problems with Bitcoin Qt

At least with Mac version, I had problems.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
September 15, 2013, 08:22:23 AM
#7
No. There is only Windows and Bitcoin on this computer. I suspect that was a bad choice to launch full client on a netbook.

What version of Windows? Maybe it's slow with Win 7, but faster with Win XP.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 08:12:11 AM
#6

This computer was supposed to be used as a semi-cold wallet, if it's unable to handle new blocks then it's better to use another one.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 08:10:44 AM
#5
Quote
I believe I would outpace the generation rate but advent of ASICs made the situation worse and now I have to switch to a more powerful computer
No wonder your ignore button is orange, i understand why people put you in ignore after reading idiocies like that  Undecided

Hehe. Personal insult is the most popular argument on this site. Sorry if I disturbed u in ur pink peaceful world, feel free to press [Ignore] button.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
September 15, 2013, 08:04:24 AM
#4
Quote
I believe I would outpace the generation rate but advent of ASICs made the situation worse and now I have to switch to a more powerful computer
No wonder your ignore button is orange, i understand why people put you in ignore after reading idiocies like that  Undecided

For new people: the number of transactions is why the most recent blocks takes longer to get rather than the earlier one. Teleport an ASIC back in 2010, when blocks had 1 transaction, and their weight would be the same.

Quote
Check your AV, I had problems with avast.
I have avast and i have no problems with Bitcoin Qt
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
September 15, 2013, 08:02:49 AM
#3
Check your AV, I had problems with avast. Just turned off for the update, and it started downloading lots faster. Maybe is your problem too?

No. There is only Windows and Bitcoin on this computer. I suspect that was a bad choice to launch full client on a netbook.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1001
Bitcoin - Resistance is futile
September 15, 2013, 07:59:38 AM
#2
Check your AV, I had problems with avast. Just turned off for the update, and it started downloading lots faster. Maybe is your problem too?
Pages:
Jump to: