Fiat is based on debt, Bitcoin is based on trust.
I know what I prefer!
Ponzi is also based on trust. So?
fxsurfer,
Ever heard of fractional reserve banking?
Can you please make an argument?
You want a free lesson in economics on a bitcoin chat board?
Your points simplified:
Banks don’t keep your money, they only have to keep a fraction of it, then they lend out the rest.
No problem, right? Because in the US our deposits are insured by the government.
-A government that is trillions of dollars in debt and our deposits are backed for a reason: because there were actual times historically when people couldn’t get their money out of banks.
And fiat is a medium of exchange with the US dollar being backed by nothing but “the full faith and credit of the US government” since it was taken off the gold standard in 1971---never mind how much less you can buy with that dollar every year since its inception.
Everything’s market value is worth what a willing and able buyer believes it to be and at this moment bitcoin is worth about $3753. Per coin whether you agree or not.
If you don’t understand the concept of intangible assets AND you are posting your assertion on a chat board, on the internet (just worthless strings of code): what can anyone tell you?
You seem to have the desire to know about banking, economics ect.
Do some reading: depressions/recessions, Adam Smith, Keynes, Milton Friedman, hell… read Karl Marx or Google.
Ok, so what that has to do with topic at hand?
What do some historical or present-day problems with dollar debt certificates have to do with the fact that they represent the ownership of borrowers' loan debt - i.e. something, while bitcoin represents the ownership of nothing?
Did you even read the opening post?