So let me get this straight - the idea is you extract wealth (by luck or crook) from your home nation - the home nation then either requires that you pay something back via local taxation or places limits on the amounts of local currency (ie.wealth) that you can convert and move out of your home nation - you then, with fox like cunning, convert your accumulated wealth/local currency into Bitcoin - you then buy into St. Kitts with a BTC equivalent minimum investment of $250k. Is this correct ?
What a wanker. Bitcoin Jesus ? Don't make me laugh. Jesus said the meek shall inherit the Earth - not that selfish twats that don't wish to give something back shall abuse a revolutionary and potentially benevolent technology to feather their own nests.
So let me get this straight:
You do not see any Gov't in the world that steals too much of its' own peoples money?
I don't think the US "steals" enough to be honest given its $1.3 trillion debt to the Chinese
.
The point is that the nouveau riche Chinese who are contemplating the Bitcoin Jesus's way forward should know that they are burning their bridges - no way home for them, while the BJ happily skims off the top of their converted Renminbi stash. But not so for the US tax exile - shit, he'll probably still be, quite legally, creaming it off the fat of the land from his US investment portfolio and from the people of the US.
This isn't what Satoshi's white paper was about for me - but I guess we can't change human nature.
Still, there isn't any point in encouraging, advocating and facilitating our base instincts is there ?
