it looks like this summer ethereum might pass it up.
can you tell me what the problem with bitcoin is?
It can't scale, it's too slow to be a currency even when the blockchain isn't congested, too factional. Segwit isn't even a longterm solution and asic mining means centralization. Bitcoin doesn't do what it was intended to do after 9 years, imagine what problems there will be in 9 more? I'd like to see an asic proof coin become top.
your beloved ethereum that you are advertising here:
- has worst scaling issues that bitcoin does.
- it is not a currency, it is a token to be used only for smart contracts on the platform
- to this date it has no solution for scaling. they have said some stuff but we have not yet seen any code, or project.
- the fees are extremely high for an altcoin that is not even yet adopted by any major amount of users. the number transactions are extremely low but the average fee per transaction is already nearing $1.5
- it is the similar PoW algorithm which can technically have similar equipments such as ASICs called something else. the reason why there isn't any ASIC-like equipment for efficiently mining ethereum is because of the intentional difficulty bug that was introduced in the early days of ethereum's release which means the difficulty will rise up with a fast speed pretty soon which is known as a little fact called ethereum difficulty bomb so no manufacturer bothered with inventing an ASIC-like miner for mining business that will die soon
- people don't even run or are willing to run a full node because the client is terribly designed and it is going to take up a lot of system resources because the blockchain size is growing at an fast speed. that leads to more centralization. what will become of ethereum in 9 more years?
- smart contracts are known to be easily exploitable. we have already seen a big scale DAO which lead to a roll-back hard-fork and a couple of more smaller ones which didn't have a big enough effect to lead to a hard fork. what will they do next time another DAO happens?
- it is a known fact that ethereum is centralized, you have no say in anything. the reason why SegWit, BU, Classic, XT have never been able to be implemented is because bitcoin is decentralized. you can't fork without having a consensus. with ethereum THEY will fork whether miners and users want it or not and will end up with 2 or more chains.
- smart contracts which is the only thing etherum is supposed to do is not really something great, it can be done on other more efficient platforms (there are a couple of them out there currently, give them a try and you will see how efficient they are) at a lower cost for the developers to register their contracts. also there is rootstock which will work pegged on bitcoin that will practically make ethereum useless.
1. Ethereum can dynamically adjust the block size for scaling. It can handle about 15 TX/s currently. Bitcoin can handle 3 TX/s
3. Yes it does, besides the tech I mentioned, look up 'Raiden Network'.
4. You have no idea what you're talking about. It has had 238,939 transactions in the last 24 hours, where Bitcoin has had 241,886. The fees aren't even $1.5, they haven't gone higher than $1.2. Median transaction fees are 0.5% of the transacted value, whereas Bitcoin's are 7%.
5. Ethereum's PoW is ASIC-resistant. It was designed in a way to give GPUs the advantage. Besides that and the difficulty bomb, Ethereum will eventually go PoS.
6. Again, you have no idea what you're talking about. Ethereum currently has 31k nodes, whereas Bitcoin has 7.4k.
7. This has nothing to do with the Ethereum network itself, which is not vulnerable to any such attacks.
8. Maybe that's for the best. I mean look where all that decentralization has left Bitcoin at. Ethereum has real, solid leadership and the developers have ETH's best interests at heart.
9. Rootstock is a sidechain which will depend on a consortium of third parties for smart contracts. So much for decentralization...