Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin mixing is NOT money laundering, per se - page 9. (Read 4155 times)

legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
So true , let's make bitcoin as equally or even more guilty to prove that we are by far better than them .
Software is not guilty. People are. And there will always be people who will evade the law provided they're privacy protected; which, as I previously mentioned, does not apply in the reverse scenario.

If you want to turn Bitcoin into a communist, privacy invading tool which provides zero support for future softforks, you can make your own client and see who follows. I believe no sane person wants Stalin-coin, but you have the freedom to use the code.

Edit: Friendly reminder that off-topic, whiny posts regarding BSV will be deleted.
hero member
Activity: 1114
Merit: 588
Ah yes the blanket statement that all politicians and fiat bosses use to annihilate a section of cryptocurrency they don't like.

They conveniently ignore the fact that their own banks are 100x more guilty for money laundering and terrorist financing at scale.

So true , let's make bitcoin as equally or even more guilty to prove that we are by far better than them .
hero member
Activity: 2240
Merit: 848

To all advocates of anti-anonymous Bitcoin and Internet tools: Bitcoin mixing is NOT money laundering, per se.



I think that should be obvious to everyone. Money Laundering involves doing something with money from illegal activities. Mixing is a tool and has nothing to do with illegal activities. It's a tool that can be used by anyone, including money launderers, but has nothing to do with money laundering itself. Just like if you own a knife that doesn't mean you committed murder, though you could use it for murder.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
In my quest to understand more about mixers, I did some research, and here's what I found.

Quote
Are cryptocurrency blenders legal?

Crypto mixers are not inherently illegal, though they are used for illegal activity. According to a July report from Chainalysis, cryptocurrency mixers are a “go-to tool for cybercriminals dealing in cryptocurrency” and illicit addresses account for nearly a quarter of funds sent to mixers since January.
In the U.S., the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) considers mixers to be money transmitters under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) that need to be registered and meet certain requirements. Chainalysis, however, noted in its report that it is “not aware of any bitcoin or Ethereum mixers currently following these rules.”
https://www.coindesk.com/learn/are-crypto-mixers-legal/

The way I understand it, they want mixers to comply with specific requirements before they can be considered legal. However, are there any mixers currently in operation that are legal?

If mixers have to fully identify their users before they can use them, then what the hell are they good for?
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
This essentially makes illegal everything except fully KYCed bitcoin held on centralized exchanges which report every single deposit, trade, and withdrawal to the US government.
I guess the Bitcoin network will be illegally operated in the US if this bills passes, as mining bitcoin falls under (1).  Grin

Ask yourself again why they care about this minuscule fraction so much while turning a blind eye to the fiat banks, which are multiple orders of magnitude worse.
It is pretty easy to pinpoint how bad bitcoin laundering is when you don't get lobbied there.  Roll Eyes

As I said, I'm looking forward to seeing how this will work. Blockchain analysis is a scam and can be totally inaccurate. Are you going to accuse someone for being a terrorist just because they happened to receive mixed coins? Are you going to force everyone sharing their TXID with the government whenever they buy/sell bitcoin? Please explain me how this works, don't just give me this giant piece of theoretical horseshit.
sr. member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 271
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Bitcoin mixing (Bitcoin mixing or Bitcoin tumbling) is a technique used to hide the identity of Bitcoin users. When using Bitcoin, transactions are publicly stored on the blockchain and can be tracked by anyone. The use of Bitcoin mixing helps to mask users' Bitcoin addresses and makes it harder to track transactions. However, the use of Bitcoin mixing can also be used to launder money and the funds are used to fund illegal activities. Therefore, the use of Bitcoin mixing completely depends on the intended use of the user. If used correctly, Bitcoin mixing is not money laundering.

And unfortunately our behavior is at the root of the problem, I find that people love to blame products when it is the user who is responsible for that behavior. What I find funny is that the law enforcement agencies keep pretending that they only see the wrongdoing of these products and blame it.

Well, to be honest, as far as I understand, If you look at him literally, the mixing of bitcoin actually hides the identity of bitcoin users and hides their addresses to make it difficult to see them. That means he can really be used for money laundering.

In short, it depends on the person holding the bitcoin, or it depends on the motive or intention of the person holding the bitcoin. I'm not saying that everyone who uses Bitcoin mixing is doing money laundering; that's not what it means. Maybe someone else is actually doing it.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
This is attacking our privacy and Bitcoin altogether.
This.

This isn't an attack against mixers - this is attack against bitcoin itself, against privacy itself. Here is how they are defining "mixing" for the purposes of this report:
The term “CVC mixing” means the facilitation of CVC transactions in a manner that obfuscates the source, destination, or amount involved in one or more transactions, regardless of the type of protocol or service used, such as:

(1) pooling or aggregating CVC from multiple persons, wallets, addresses, or accounts;
(2) using programmatic or algorithmic code to coordinate, manage, or manipulate the structure of a transaction;
(3) splitting CVC for transmittal and transmitting the CVC through a series of independent transactions;
(4) creating and using single-use wallets, addresses, or accounts, and sending CVC through such wallets, addresses, or accounts through a series of independent transactions;
(5) exchanging between types of CVC or other digital assets; or
(6) facilitating user-initiated delays in transactional activity.

And most importantly, simply owning your own coins, holding them in your own wallet, and using them as you like falls under (3) and (4). "Creating and using single-use addresses", for fuck sake! You know, the entire way bitcoin is supposed to be used in the first place.


3 & 4 is not about just having wallets or addresses!!! (your again going back to your old group-speak chants that just being a node is being made illegal(facepalm))

its actually about the activity to then coin-hop funds down a path of multiple transaction taints which then make it appear funds moving along those addresses all belonging to the same wallet. thus doing a suspicious money shuffling (shell game) procedure that normal people dont do

EG if a VASP(exchange) had flagging tools that knows funds from address A are blacklisted.
and address A owner just moves funds to address B C D E before then depositing thinking a 4 taint hop to E address is sufficient taint distance to declare clean. however this would not to the VASP mean its sufficient distance to declare clean, just via taint hopping. because the very act of taint hopping becomes suspicious in of itself

the way they would vasp/services monitor or flag something as taint hopping is the way services did years ago. when people would spam every block moving a certain amount of funds to new addresses where in logical common sense real world utility, funds would not move to new addresses every 10 minutes several times

a tip for you:
if you can learn what their descriptors of suspicious activity really mean. you lot of privacy queens can then advise/design services that avoid these methods, thus not get spotted
so learn what these descriptors/methodologies actually mean, to learn how not to get highlighted

The term “CVC mixing” means the facilitation of CVC transactions in a manner
(5) exchanging between types of CVC or other digital assets; or

This definition exempts the use of internal protocols or processes to execute transactions by banks, broker-dealers, or money services businesses, including VASPs, that would otherwise constitute CVC mixing, provided that these financial institutions preserve records of the source and destination of CVC transactions when using such internal protocols and processes, and provide such records to regulators and law enforcement, where required by law.

This essentially makes illegal everything except fully KYCed bitcoin held on centralized exchanges
..
Any non-KYC exchange falls under (1) and (5). Any kind of decentralized or peer to peer trading falls under (5).

that part, just adds more weight that exchange services should be regulated to avoid being treated as suspicious/illegal
(EG localbitcoins.com users got slapped around alot years ago for running exchange services without a money transmitter MSB licence, same will be said for DE-FI swap services..)


and big tip for you. in combination with other regulations.. it does not make just being  bitcoin node/bitcoin wallet owner/btc holder illegal.. but it does mean being an LN router DE-FI service using your own involvement to facilitate a payment for someone else for a fee, becomes a factor you should be aware of.. if you participate in shuffling(shellgame) value for others for a fee.. then if your not a regulated service that registered for a money transmitter/MSB licence to be verified as a VASP then expect problems
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18771
This is attacking our privacy and Bitcoin altogether.
This.

This isn't an attack against mixers - this is attack against bitcoin itself, against privacy itself. Here is how they are defining "mixing" for the purposes of this report:
The term “CVC mixing” means the facilitation of CVC transactions in a manner that obfuscates the source, destination, or amount involved in one or more transactions, regardless of the type of protocol or service used, such as:

(1) pooling or aggregating CVC from multiple persons, wallets, addresses, or accounts;
(2) using programmatic or algorithmic code to coordinate, manage, or manipulate the structure of a transaction;
(3) splitting CVC for transmittal and transmitting the CVC through a series of independent transactions;
(4) creating and using single-use wallets, addresses, or accounts, and sending CVC through such wallets, addresses, or accounts through a series of independent transactions;
(5) exchanging between types of CVC or other digital assets; or
(6) facilitating user-initiated delays in transactional activity.

This definition excepts the use of internal protocols or processes to execute transactions by banks, broker-dealers, or money services businesses, including VASPs, that would otherwise constitute CVC mixing, provided that these financial institutions preserve records of the source and destination of CVC transactions when using such internal protocols and processes, and provide such records to regulators and law enforcement, where required by law.

This essentially makes illegal everything except fully KYCed bitcoin held on centralized exchanges which report every single deposit, trade, and withdrawal to the US government. Mixers fall under (1). Coinjoins fall under (2). Casinos and sportsbooks fall under (1). Any non-KYC exchange falls under (1) and (5). Any kind of decentralized or peer to peer trading falls under (5).

And most importantly, simply owning your own coins, holding them in your own wallet, and using them as you like falls under (3) and (4). "Creating and using single-use addresses", for fuck sake! You know, the entire way bitcoin is supposed to be used in the first place.

This needs fought against, hard.



Re-reading the proposal in more depth, and here's another piece worth highlighting:

Quote
FinCEN’s analysis of the top 10 CVC mixers by volume per commercially available data determined that approximately 33 percent of all deposits as of August 2022 were attributed to high risk sources, with 13 percent of all deposits coming from known illicit activities.

In August 2022, FinCEN analyzed 10 mixers, finding that these services processed more than $20 billion in total volume between January 2011 and August 2022. The majority of this total occurred between January 2021 and August 2022. FinCEN assessed what sources constituted high risk and illicit activites based on commercial source attributions of entities.

So $20 billion in volume over a 12 year period, 13% of which was from illicit activities. So a grand total of $2.6 billion of illicit money over 12 years. Let's put that in to context. Danske bank laundered $230 billion through their branch in Estonia. Wachovia laundered $390 billion for drug cartels. Standard Chartered laundered $265 billion for Iran and other sanctioned nations. 18 of the world's biggest 20 banks have been fined for money laundering - and these are only the cases we know about. By FinCEN's own research (which just so happens to be a black box like all bullshit chain analysis - I wonder why? Roll Eyes), a single money laundering incident involving a single fiat bank is responsible for more than 100x all illicit mixer use over the last 12 years. Once you combine the hundreds of fiat bank money laundering incidents, then this $2.6 billion attributable to cryptocurrency becomes completely irrelevant.

Ask yourself again why they care about this minuscule fraction so much while turning a blind eye to the fiat banks, which are multiple orders of magnitude worse. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1292
Hhampuz for Campaign management
It's true that mixers aren't designed for money laundering, but due to their potential for obfuscating transactions, people often assume they are used for that purpose. I wonder how many mixers have been shut down or had funds seized by the government. Unfortunately, these actions can tarnish the reputation of the entire industry, if we can even call it that.

However, those who have a good understanding of Bitcoin know that it's not completely anonymous anymore. Once the source address is known, it becomes easier to trace transactions associated with a specific account. There are individuals who highly value their privacy, especially if they hold a substantial balance in their wallet. They don't want their funds to be easily traceable. That's where mixers come into play, offering a way to enhance privacy. Still, it's important to note that mixers can't prevent malicious actors from using them, as mixers don't typically investigate the source of funds.

In my quest to understand more about mixers, I did some research, and here's what I found.

Quote
Are cryptocurrency blenders legal?

Crypto mixers are not inherently illegal, though they are used for illegal activity. According to a July report from Chainalysis, cryptocurrency mixers are a “go-to tool for cybercriminals dealing in cryptocurrency” and illicit addresses account for nearly a quarter of funds sent to mixers since January.
In the U.S., the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) considers mixers to be money transmitters under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) that need to be registered and meet certain requirements. Chainalysis, however, noted in its report that it is “not aware of any bitcoin or Ethereum mixers currently following these rules.”
https://www.coindesk.com/learn/are-crypto-mixers-legal/

The way I understand it, they want mixers to comply with specific requirements before they can be considered legal. However, are there any mixers currently in operation that are legal?
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
“More broadly, the Treasury Department is aggressively combatting illicit use of all aspects of the CVC ecosystem by terrorist groups, including Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.”
"Never leave a good crisis to waste".

This is attacking our privacy and Bitcoin altogether. It will push everything decentralized. If I'm aware that centralized exchanges will be forced to classify mixed coins as funding terrorism, then I'd absolutely not risk it. The bill is clearly dystopian, but I didn't expect more from not technically competent politicians; every coin is potentially originating from what this article deems as mixing. What are they going to do? Completely ban bitcoin? I'm looking forward to see how this goes.
hero member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 565
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Seems that in a few days/weeks mixing will be laundering ( and much more ) per se . For all the advertisers here of mixing services this might be a warning . Funding terrorism is now on the table https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-new-regulation-enhance-transparency-convertible-virtual-currency  

These scumbag politicians will look for whatever opportunity to restrict an individual's right to self-determination. These regulations will have no effect whatsoever on terrorist groups. It will only harm regular people, especially those from marginalized groups, who seek privacy amidst the mass surveillance we are subjected to from corporations and government agencies.

It's too soon to tell what will happen with all the mixers who advertise on the forum but as US policy creeps closer to full-blown authoritarianism I expect decentralized and non-custodial options will start to become more popular and eventually traditional custodial mixers may become obsolete.
Without a doubt, its scary how lawmakers, who are often motivated by their own personal goals, use any opportunity to limit people's rights. Their grasp on rules, which is said to be meant to go after terrorist groups, is at best funny and at worst very scary. Sadly, you're right; these steps always have an effect on the normal person instead of the people they were meant to help. The people who are really at risk are regular people who want to hide from the ever-watchful eyes of corporations and the government. Not a very good irony, is it?

It looks like the writing is on the wall for mixers in the future. As rules get stricter, it looks like we will have to move toward decentralized and non-custodial choices. In the coming years, traditional cleaning mixers may become almost useless because of changes in politics. People are hoping that decentralized solutions will step up and protect their rights and safety.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
Seems that in a few days/weeks mixing will be laundering ( and much more ) per se . For all the advertisers here of mixing services this might be a warning . Funding terrorism is now on the table https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-new-regulation-enhance-transparency-convertible-virtual-currency  

Ah yes the blanket statement that all politicians and fiat bosses use to annihilate a section of cryptocurrency they don't like.

They conveniently ignore the fact that their own banks are 100x more guilty for money laundering and terrorist financing at scale.

And even crypto exchanges don't get to escape the cross-fire, no. Binance willingly laundered money for Iran (the sponsor of terrorist groups that are attacking Israel right now). And who knows how much shit FTX was allowed to get away with before they imploded?

not just "mixing" but AEC (anonymity enhanced cryptocurrencies)

Litecoin has MimbleWimble transactions, which makes an AEC. Let's see if these knuckleheads try to ban LTC too.

Oh and wallets like Samourai and Wasabi wallet would be killed by this bill too, despite the latter's "blacklisting" feature (which hasn't even been made yet).

Slightly off topic: I only find Chipmixer, Bestmixer, Tornado Cash, Blender.io and Sinbad keywords in ther proposal, I thought I would find "Whirlwind" because they said they had a problem.

They only include mixers in the document that had official governmental action taken against them (with the exception of Sinbad I guess, which is all rumors up to now...)
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
This is not good, although it's still a proposal and will be submitted in the next two days, there's a chance they might accept it.

2. Definition of CVC mixing
The term “CVC mixing” means the facilitation of CVC transactions in a manner that obfuscates the source, destination, or amount involved in one or more transactions, regardless of the type of protocol or service used, such as:
(1) pooling or aggregating CVC from multiple persons, wallets, addresses, or accounts;
(2) using programmatic or algorithmic code to coordinate, manage, or manipulate the structure of a transaction;
(3) splitting CVC for transmittal and transmitting the CVC through a series of independent transactions;
(4) creating and using single-use wallets, addresses, or accounts, and sending CVC through such wallets, addresses, or accounts through a series of independent transactions; (5) exchanging between types of CVC or other digital assets; or
(6) facilitating user-initiated delays in transactional activity.
This make any form of privacy e.g. mixing, coinjoining, and swap to privacy coins are considered as CVC mixing.

not just "mixing" but AEC (anonymity enhanced cryptocurrencies)

here is the thing though. this quote has listed methodologies they class as indications of mixing.. so be smart. stop calling a service a mixer. look at the methods they list to suspect mixing and create a service that does none of the things regulated as mixing and instead has the result people want without being so stupidly named as then thing thats regulated..

be smart, figure it out
sr. member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 379
Top Crypto Casino
Seems that in a few days/weeks mixing will be laundering ( and much more ) per se . For all the advertisers here of mixing services this might be a warning . Funding terrorism is now on the table https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-new-regulation-enhance-transparency-convertible-virtual-currency  

These scumbag politicians will look for whatever opportunity to restrict an individual's right to self-determination. These regulations will have no effect whatsoever on terrorist groups. It will only harm regular people, especially those from marginalized groups, who seek privacy amidst the mass surveillance we are subjected to from corporations and government agencies.

It's too soon to tell what will happen with all the mixers who advertise on the forum but as US policy creeps closer to full-blown authoritarianism I expect decentralized and non-custodial options will start to become more popular and eventually traditional custodial mixers may become obsolete.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 680
Seems that in a few/days weeks mixing will be laundering ( and much more ) per se . For all the advertisers here of mixing services this might be a warning . Funding terrorism is now on the table https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-new-regulation-enhance-transparency-convertible-virtual-currency 
First I don't know what CVC is, until I found this.

What is Bitcoin?
Bitcoin is a convertible virtual currency. Virtual currency is a digital representation of value that functions as a medium of exchange, a unit of account, and/or a store of value.

This is not good, although it's still a proposal and will be submitted in the next two days, there's a chance they might accept it.

2. Definition of CVC mixing
The term “CVC mixing” means the facilitation of CVC transactions in a manner that obfuscates the source, destination, or amount involved in one or more transactions, regardless of the type of protocol or service used, such as:
(1) pooling or aggregating CVC from multiple persons, wallets, addresses, or accounts;
(2) using programmatic or algorithmic code to coordinate, manage, or manipulate the structure of a transaction;
(3) splitting CVC for transmittal and transmitting the CVC through a series of independent transactions;
(4) creating and using single-use wallets, addresses, or accounts, and sending CVC through such wallets, addresses, or accounts through a series of independent transactions; (5) exchanging between types of CVC or other digital assets; or
(6) facilitating user-initiated delays in transactional activity.
This make any form of privacy e.g. mixing, coinjoining, and swap to privacy coins are considered as CVC mixing.

Slightly off topic: I only find Chipmixer, Bestmixer, Tornado Cash, Blender.io and Sinbad keywords in ther proposal, I thought I would find "Whirlwind" because they said they had a problem.
hero member
Activity: 1114
Merit: 588
Seems that in a few days/weeks mixing will be laundering ( and much more ) per se . For all the advertisers here of mixing services this might be a warning . Funding terrorism is now on the table https://www.fincen.gov/news/news-releases/fincen-proposes-new-regulation-enhance-transparency-convertible-virtual-currency  
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
Some clarification is needed to this board due to the recent incident with ChipMixer.

To all advocates of anti-anonymous Bitcoin and Internet tools: Bitcoin mixing is NOT money laundering, per se.

snip

P.S.: You can't have privacy without money laundering due to the nature of humans-- by the way, the opposite does not necessarily hold true.
the government that banned bitcoin Tumblr said that mixing was a place for money laundering but they did not explain in detail the difference between money laundering and the use of mixing itself causing ambiguity in society.  before there was bitcoin, officials and criminals used houses, land, gold and valuables like cars to launder money but when bitcoin appeared, some used bitcoin as a money laundering option but they thought bitcoin was just like any other untraceable, that was a big mistake, actually people who do money laundering with bitcoins are very easy to trace.  So it's actually important that the advertisement explaining the true function and purpose of mixing is reported so that confusion in the community about what mixing is doesn't spread.

mixing has one function.. to mix. its not a retailer. its not a forex its not a fruit stall. its sole purpose is to mix.
its only advertised to mix, its promoted and used only to mix
regulations are clear that they MAKE regulated businesses monitor and scrutinise mixer users closely.

emphasis again
mixing is wrote into regulations to be watched more closely(= less privacy)

once more.. for luck
MIXING puts you on a watch list.

so the solution to privacy is not .. wait for it.. take a minute to breathe and let this settle in..
so the solution to privacy is not services advertised specifically as mixing

lets word it another way

imagine prostitution was being watched by the police.
would you name a business "prostitution house" or try something new like 'massage parlour' or 'escort service'
you know. just to make it a lil different and ambiguous to not be an instant knock at the door inspection of the premises
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 151
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
Some clarification is needed to this board due to the recent incident with ChipMixer.

To all advocates of anti-anonymous Bitcoin and Internet tools: Bitcoin mixing is NOT money laundering, per se.

snip

P.S.: You can't have privacy without money laundering due to the nature of humans-- by the way, the opposite does not necessarily hold true.
the government that banned bitcoin Tumblr said that mixing was a place for money laundering but they did not explain in detail the difference between money laundering and the use of mixing itself causing ambiguity in society.  before there was bitcoin, officials and criminals used houses, land, gold and valuables like cars to launder money but when bitcoin appeared, some used bitcoin as a money laundering option but they thought bitcoin was just like any other untraceable, that was a big mistake, actually people who do money laundering with bitcoins are very easy to trace.  So it's actually important that the advertisement explaining the true function and purpose of mixing is reported so that confusion in the community about what mixing is doesn't spread.

legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
did you know that the $100 and $99change from scenario A is being then scrutinised for where the $100 came from and where the $99 ends up
If you think that you can fool chain analysis companies and regulatory authorities by buying chewing gums, then I don't know what to say.

scenario B is not registered nor required to register, nor deemed illegal for not registering as a money transmitter business. it does not do KYC nor appear on any regulation policy to scrutinise its customers identity or purpose or source or destination of deposits/withdrawals. YET you get the same result as A of different taint/denominations out as what went in
Except from the fact that the taint nonsense continues insusceptible to such moron techniques, due to it being absolutely arbitrary in the first place. If you want privacy in Bitcoin, mixing is inevitable. If you want to "not look suspicious", sacrificing your privacy is inevitable.

and the idiot still wants to say any other form of coins shuffling/swapping is bad but it has to be specifically "mixing" that everyone has to use.. even though its "mixing" that is LITERALLY WROTE IN REGULATIONS TO BE WATCHED MORE CLOSELY

see how ignorant the idiot is. he cares more about his contract to advertise mixers to recruit people into schemes that will get them noticed more.. more so than he cares about privacy

total moron

..
i think he needs one more lesson

lets say using a bicycle on a motorway/highway, will attract the police to stop the vehicle and take it off the motorway/highway..

there are many other vehicles that can use the highway without drawing the attention to the police. but a bicycle is speficically listed as the main things cops should be on the watch for..
blackhat is telling people only ride bicycles on a highway.

guess what. if everyone done it, everyone gets stopped by the cops.

.. he thinks that if he can get everyone to ride a bicycle on a highway, he can make police give up.
what he is not realising is he is making cops get easy arrests..
legendary
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1363
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
The Department of Justice of the United States announced that it plans to pay special attention to exchanges and mixers to counter money laundering. In general, it does not seem that there is anything in the field of cryptocurrencies that does not attract the attention of certain government structures.

This is nothing new. The US government has been on a "witch hunt" to minimize crypto's dominance in the country after what happened with FTX. They seriously don't want American people to join in the revolution. A pity for them, as other countries will "eat their cake". As far as mixers go, they're a contentious subject among major countries in the world. They're quickly classified as "money laundering tools" just because governments don't want people to use them. Financial freedom and privacy goes against governments' own rules.

I think centralized mixers will ultimately disappear, paving the way for decentralized (non-custodial) mixers to take over the industry. I'm fine with that as long as people use mixers in a legal and responsible manner. Just my opinion Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: