if you ignore the fact that the entire graph range is only +/- 2% of course it looks like a big drop... if the range was instead +/- 20% it'd look like the minor change that it is.
It's only 2%, but it's 2% per day for 4 days. In total, we're about -10% of the network a week or two ago. 
Topic: Bitcoin Network Hash Rate Begins Massive Tank - page 2. (Read 4360 times)
Because it is in tacotime's best interest for people to stop mining litecoins, most threads in speculation forums have an agenda
Why are threads created with misleading titles like bitcointalk is some tabloid rag?
if you ignore the fact that the entire graph range is only +/- 2% of course it looks like a big drop... if the range was instead +/- 20% it'd look like the minor change that it is.
I'm pointing out that the trend upwards has finally reversed.
This is the speculation forum, not the "here's my intelligent retrospective analysis of data I obtained from the future" forum.
This is the speculation forum, not the "here's my intelligent retrospective analysis of data I obtained from the future" forum.
So a title like "Hash Rate Breaking Upward Trend?" didn't seem more accurate? The addition of "Begins Massive Tank" seems really sensationalist to me.
I get we're in the 'speculation' forum, I'm just getting tired of the implied "OMG Crisis" in the thread topics.
Such as "Crash" titles when BTC declines by $1 USD. It's hyperbolic and makes little sense.
I'm pointing out that the trend upwards has finally reversed.
This is the speculation forum, not the "here's my intelligent retrospective analysis of data I obtained from the future" forum.
This is the speculation forum, not the "here's my intelligent retrospective analysis of data I obtained from the future" forum.
So you're concerned about a dip that has a higher low than the two preceding it?
Why are threads created with misleading titles like bitcointalk is some tabloid rag?
Why are threads created with misleading titles like bitcointalk is some tabloid rag?
lite coins hash rate has jumped quite a bit, maybe it is some big GPU farms.
I don't really like looking at the 1-day average. It's too inconsistent, and can very easily be swayed by variance, without actually a drop in hashrate. That said, the 3-day windows has dropped off significantly since 12/12/4:
It looks to be too much for just variance. Seems the next diff recalculate might be a little lower.
It looks to be too much for just variance. Seems the next diff recalculate might be a little lower.
Maybe a manufacturer of asics is done with "quality control" and they are ready to ship?
Greatest %/day decreases in years
Ruh roh
Jump to: