blackchip, americascardroom, and betcoin are all the same network and effectively the same room.
Betcoin 4.5
SWC 4
Betcoin 4.5
SWC 4
Thanks!
Updated 7/22
Topic: BITCOIN POKER SITE RANKINGS (user generated) - page 3. (Read 5762 times)
Thanks!
Updated 7/22
blackchip, americascardroom, and betcoin are all the same network and effectively the same room.
Betcoin 4.5
SWC 4
Betcoin 4.5
SWC 4
Any more scores for these poker sites? Or any sites worth adding to the ranking list?
betcoin and seals are the only two poker rooms, i dont think any other rooms have a chance to get big.
Any more scores for these poker sites? Or any sites worth adding to the ranking list?
Anonibet - 5
cloudbet - 3.5
cloudbet - 3.5
I'm guessing this was meant for the sports book rankings...
Anonibet - 5
cloudbet - 3.5
cloudbet - 3.5
Seals with clubs 1
Betcoin poker 4
Seals with clubs is not good, they have been long time in the market and dont improve anything, today tried to play and after downloading the client i try to enter with my account and it says new version available please visit xxxx, but it dont even have the link and if you put type that url in browser it gets to seals error page.
Dont have password recovery, and their browser client sucks.
Betcoin poker 4
Seals with clubs is not good, they have been long time in the market and dont improve anything, today tried to play and after downloading the client i try to enter with my account and it says new version available please visit xxxx, but it dont even have the link and if you put type that url in browser it gets to seals error page.
Dont have password recovery, and their browser client sucks.
Thanks for the scores.
Updated 7/6
Seals with clubs 1
Betcoin poker 4
Seals with clubs is not good, they have been long time in the market and dont improve anything, today tried to play and after downloading the client i try to enter with my account and it says new version available please visit xxxx, but it dont even have the link and if you put type that url in browser it gets to seals error page.
Dont have password recovery, and their browser client sucks.
Betcoin poker 4
Seals with clubs is not good, they have been long time in the market and dont improve anything, today tried to play and after downloading the client i try to enter with my account and it says new version available please visit xxxx, but it dont even have the link and if you put type that url in browser it gets to seals error page.
Dont have password recovery, and their browser client sucks.
SWC: 4.5 - Rakeback, HU tables, relatively good volume, good value GTD tourneys incl 20 btc gtd, no ID required, no verification required, freerolls, not only have they been around the longest, but also good communication and they listen to user feedback, reliable payouts/withdrawals
I just like to give a " 2 " to:
americascardroom.eu
blackchippoker.eu
These are not really bitcoin poker sites. Sure you can most likely deposit with bitcoin (and not even withdrawal?) Either way, you don't play with bitcoin, you play with dollars.
On addition I like to add:
gridpoker.eu
with a 3.5 . Their biggest disadvantage is that they only have a Windows client and partly because of that they don't have much traffic. But they do develop/improve a lot on that client. They are running some microstake GTDs and some (microstake) NLHE / OFC cash games.
Seals, BetcoinPoker, PRC - my favorites, but seem ok in your ranking I guess.
americascardroom.eu
blackchippoker.eu
These are not really bitcoin poker sites. Sure you can most likely deposit with bitcoin (and not even withdrawal?) Either way, you don't play with bitcoin, you play with dollars.
On addition I like to add:
gridpoker.eu
with a 3.5 . Their biggest disadvantage is that they only have a Windows client and partly because of that they don't have much traffic. But they do develop/improve a lot on that client. They are running some microstake GTDs and some (microstake) NLHE / OFC cash games.
Seals, BetcoinPoker, PRC - my favorites, but seem ok in your ranking I guess.
to Ryan feel free to delete my post and pm me and I'll post a shorter post if this is too long for you.
I can vote for gridpoker.eu as well. i give them 2/5. I really dislike ALL the sites that use 10000 chips/ btc cus it inevitably leads to much smaller games unless people factor that in and multiply their buyins by 10 but my problem is that people who play for fun DO NOT think this way and they are happy to play tournaments that are 20 chips/10 chips buyin cus that seems like a decent amount when they play for fiat, but these bitcoin turned into fiat isn't worth it for any serious poker players. There is a psychological factor at play that keeps all sites that offer 10000 chips/ btc stagnant imho. This exchange will be fine if btc was worth more way more than it is now but right now their games are so small that the sites won't make any money and they won't grow. For example gridpoker.eu has 50 people+ playing in their freerolls, as many as any of the other sites that offer freerolls but they get about 2 tourneys/ day to run that aren't freerolls and these prize pools are around 20 chips or 1$ if converted to fiat.
I can vote for gridpoker.eu as well. i give them 2/5. I really dislike ALL the sites that use 10000 chips/ btc cus it inevitably leads to much smaller games unless people factor that in and multiply their buyins by 10 but my problem is that people who play for fun DO NOT think this way and they are happy to play tournaments that are 20 chips/10 chips buyin cus that seems like a decent amount when they play for fiat, but these bitcoin turned into fiat isn't worth it for any serious poker players. There is a psychological factor at play that keeps all sites that offer 10000 chips/ btc stagnant imho. This exchange will be fine if btc was worth more way more than it is now but right now their games are so small that the sites won't make any money and they won't grow. For example gridpoker.eu has 50 people+ playing in their freerolls, as many as any of the other sites that offer freerolls but they get about 2 tourneys/ day to run that aren't freerolls and these prize pools are around 20 chips or 1$ if converted to fiat.
Thank you for your scores! Sorry for the delayed update.
Updated 7/6
to Ryan feel free to delete my post and pm me and I'll post a shorter post if this is too long for you.
I can vote for gridpoker.eu as well. i give them 2/5. I really dislike ALL the sites that use 10000 chips/ btc cus it inevitably leads to much smaller games unless people factor that in and multiply their buyins by 10 but my problem is that people who play for fun DO NOT think this way and they are happy to play tournaments that are 20 chips/10 chips buyin cus that seems like a decent amount when they play for fiat, but these bitcoin turned into fiat isn't worth it for any serious poker players. There is a psychological factor at play that keeps all sites that offer 10000 chips/ btc stagnant imho. This exchange will be fine if btc was worth more way more than it is now but right now their games are so small that the sites won't make any money and they won't grow. For example gridpoker.eu has 50 people+ playing in their freerolls, as many as any of the other sites that offer freerolls but they get about 2 tourneys/ day to run that aren't freerolls and these prize pools are around 20 chips or 1$ if converted to fiat.
I can vote for gridpoker.eu as well. i give them 2/5. I really dislike ALL the sites that use 10000 chips/ btc cus it inevitably leads to much smaller games unless people factor that in and multiply their buyins by 10 but my problem is that people who play for fun DO NOT think this way and they are happy to play tournaments that are 20 chips/10 chips buyin cus that seems like a decent amount when they play for fiat, but these bitcoin turned into fiat isn't worth it for any serious poker players. There is a psychological factor at play that keeps all sites that offer 10000 chips/ btc stagnant imho. This exchange will be fine if btc was worth more way more than it is now but right now their games are so small that the sites won't make any money and they won't grow. For example gridpoker.eu has 50 people+ playing in their freerolls, as many as any of the other sites that offer freerolls but they get about 2 tourneys/ day to run that aren't freerolls and these prize pools are around 20 chips or 1$ if converted to fiat.
I just like to give a " 2 " to:
americascardroom.eu
blackchippoker.eu
These are not really bitcoin poker sites. Sure you can most likely deposit with bitcoin (and not even withdrawal?) Either way, you don't play with bitcoin, you play with dollars.
On addition I like to add:
gridpoker.eu
with a 3.5 . Their biggest disadvantage is that they only have a Windows client and partly because of that they don't have much traffic. But they do develop/improve a lot on that client. They are running some microstake GTDs and some (microstake) NLHE / OFC cash games.
Seals, BetcoinPoker, PRC - my favorites, but seem ok in your ranking I guess.
americascardroom.eu
blackchippoker.eu
These are not really bitcoin poker sites. Sure you can most likely deposit with bitcoin (and not even withdrawal?) Either way, you don't play with bitcoin, you play with dollars.
On addition I like to add:
gridpoker.eu
with a 3.5 . Their biggest disadvantage is that they only have a Windows client and partly because of that they don't have much traffic. But they do develop/improve a lot on that client. They are running some microstake GTDs and some (microstake) NLHE / OFC cash games.
Seals, BetcoinPoker, PRC - my favorites, but seem ok in your ranking I guess.
SWC: 4.5 - Rakeback, HU tables, relatively good volume, good value GTD tourneys incl 20 btc gtd, no ID required, no verification required, freerolls, not only have they been around the longest, but also good communication and they listen to user feedback, reliable payouts/withdrawals
Any more scores out there?
SealsWithClubs by a mile!
4.7/5
The only thing i think needs improvement is the UI, but the community is great and so is the gameplay.
4.7/5
The only thing i think needs improvement is the UI, but the community is great and so is the gameplay.
Thank you,
Updated 6/24
SealsWithClubs by a mile!
4.7/5
The only thing i think needs improvement is the UI, but the community is great and so is the gameplay.
4.7/5
The only thing i think needs improvement is the UI, but the community is great and so is the gameplay.
SwC is listed here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-betting-sites-total-of-bets-top-50-gambling-sites1-year-old-now-529963 along with other B related poker sites
That looks to be a list of the sites with the most action... Definitely useful to see where everyone is betting.
Betcoin 4/5, Great interface, support and tourney selection. Only issue is lack of players.
Agreed, lack of players but experience has been great at Betcoin. I multi-table on both sites now. They should merge and dominate the industry.
Betcoin - 4.8 - awesome experience, more players needed
Seals - 4.2 - good activity
Betcoin - 4.8 - awesome experience, more players needed
Seals - 4.2 - good activity
Thank you!
Rankings updated 6/19
SwC is listed here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-betting-sites-total-of-bets-top-50-gambling-sites1-year-old-now-529963 along with other B related poker sites
Betcoin 4/5, Great interface, support and tourney selection. Only issue is lack of players.
Agreed, lack of players but experience has been great at Betcoin. I multi-table on both sites now. They should merge and dominate the industry.
Betcoin - 4.8 - awesome experience, more players needed
Seals - 4.2 - good activity
Betcoin - 4.8 - awesome experience, more players needed
Seals - 4.2 - good activity
Thank you!
Rankings updated 6/19
Agreed, lack of players but experience has been great at Betcoin. I multi-table on both sites now. They should merge and dominate the industry.
Betcoin - 4.8 - awesome experience, more players needed
Seals - 4.2 - good activity
Betcoin - 4.8 - awesome experience, more players needed
Seals - 4.2 - good activity
Betcoin 4/5, Great interface, support and tourney selection. Only issue is lack of players.
Jump to: