Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 131. (Read 215611 times)

@nomachine - for another puzzle, do I need to change anything in the script other than keyrange and pubkey? Why am I asking you? Because, in order to test, I put the public key from #64 and a very small keyrange, between f7051f26b09112d4 and f7051f2ab09112d4 (17799667353283269332:17799667370463138516) and it is obvious that the search is done outside the keyrange, in decimal, from 10000000000000000000 to 29999999999999999999 or even greater.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/10/16/RrO2l.gif

I always wondered when I work with target +1, 2, 3 etc what would be the results, so now I need to wonder no more. There are some interesting results when we start adding to our target and then divide.

In the script above, if you start by scalar_1 +1 without changing scalar_2, running the script and only look at keys similar to n/2, n/4, n/6 etc, then keep adding to scalar_1 and run again to see where those n/? values  appear.

Note that when we don't know the actual 2 targets, we can always know the resulting keys, but when we change one target with a known key, then knowing the resulting keys would solve the key for us, that's what is needed, however there are ways and tricks to hit one previously unknown key in one of the new results if we keep changing our known key at scalar_1 or 2.

---

Something to work with.
Let scalar_1 be :  0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000af55fc59c335c8ec67e66df8b
Subtract this from it :  af00000000000000000000000
Result: put at scalar_2
0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000055fc59c335c8ec67e66df8b

Now run and see the results, you will see  af00000000000000000000000  being divided, so whatever we subtract from our target ( scalar_1 ), the results of script above will show us that number being divided even if we don't know it's key.

Now since we can always know the resulting keys as long as the 2 targets are unknown and we already know the distance between them, but now I'm interested to find out more.

Example:

Subtracting this from puzzle 130,
0000000000000000000000000000000400000000000000000000000000000000
Result: (offset1)
0308360beeb0177961b04eccc33decdf63e23d205abc8ef6355d659d1313459ba7
Subtracting above from #130, result : (offset2)
0283aac9d18b994b94c0d267921573958682a061d033e89d2b0c4614c760755e60

Now what if we use offset1 and offset2 as our targets and do the divide and sub like the script above? If we could find a known key in the results, we can solve #130, or any private key. 😉

---

Chop chop, don't just stare and forget, also remember when you find the solution to solve any key, if you like your head to stay on your shoulders, hands off the people's coins. ey 😉

@nomachine ... the first time I tried to see if it works for me, now I changed the search range and the constant prefix of the seed.
Thank's

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/10/14/RkTR9.gif

that will not even be the case but the bounty alone is worth it if it would be paid in cryptocurrency but is the resources investment going to be covered with profits made afterwards? that is the real question here

hi, can anyone install the KeyHunt-Cuda strid?

@nomachine
Your #130 lotto script works very easily, gonna leave it running on one of my pcs 24/7!
I reckon:

• [Lower range limit]: 1063382396627932698323045648224275660800
• [Upper range limit]: 1334544907768055536395422288521465954303

@Zahid888 and @nomachine and all other seed lovers, I have something for you.  https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/bounty-offered-for-secret-nsa-seeds-behind-nist-elliptic-curves-algo/
You guys are really talented and I'm sure you can come up with a script to brute force those seeds, don't forget to share the script.😉

You can also setup smaller range in the frame in this mammoth

or even smaller


and so on...

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2023/10/13/RExYZ.gif

I have been working on artificial intelligence research for years. If randomness is good enough to simulate reality and intelligence is part of reality(assuming that we ourselves are not living in a simulation),  
it should be good enough to simulate emotions and physical abilities - true intelligence.
if you have a True randomness in your PC you will have possibility to have consciousness in your computer.
To cut a long story short.
If that is true (in absolute terms) ,  Singularity is close  

There is no problem with urandom it is enough random for all cryptographic purposes.

Please all read the next article: https://www.2uo.de/myths-about-urandom/

@nomachine one of the Hardware device that it is include most modern Intel processors, that is used to feed the entropy of the CSRNG of the linux kernel and windows core, use Thermodinamic properties to generate True random data:

From: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/guide/intel-digital-random-number-generator-drng-software-implementation-guide.html

So that means that most of the modern PC are cable to generate True Random data.

Computers are deterministic, predictable machines and are designed to blindly follow sets of instructions in a repeatable manner. This nature of computers has, of course, served us extremely well for most of the last century, but this design has a fundamental flaw: it cannot perform true random operations. True randomness is in quantum mechanics with time/space/gravity - I will stop here in order not to stray too far from the topic....

Most popular programming languages have some form of random number generator built in that programmers can use. These generators usually take as input the current date and time, encode this value using an algorithm and output a value so different from the input that we perceive them as random. A pseudorandom number generator, also known as a deterministic random bit generator, is an algorithm used to generate a sequence of numbers with properties that approximate those of truly random numbers.

On all Unix-like systems, including all Linux distributions, there is a pseudo device file
"/dev/urandom"

If it doesn't exist, it might indicate a problem with system's configuration or user permissions. Or is not Linux.

"Looks random to me" - is a pretty poor judgment for me in determining if something is random.

Can you explain ? 

This looks like a serious deal. 

I would gladly love to solve the puzzle for you and I accept the offer of your 10% profit. All you need is to load $200,000 in a vast ai GPU rental website in order for me to be able to proceed and I assure you a maximum result time of 3 days. We will be able to solve either puzzle 130 or 66 and share the profit as you've suggested in the sharing ratio of 90:10.
let me know or you can send me an inbox with the next steps. Thank you,