I could create hundreds of scripts that match the puzzle, but the creator most likely edited the keys manually, otherwise random would be used instead of pre-generated HD wallets.
haven't you learned to quote properly?
It is not manually it is with some script, errors = ZERO
Don't you think you are assuming too much, with the little we know about the creator? We really don't even know if he knows how to program or not.
you just want to justify your answer against all possibilities.
He simply said that he used an HD wallet and modified the keys with zeros and ones, that is, he removed part of the keys to establish the difficulty.
If it were done through a script, it would be used randomly and not a pre-generated HD wallet because it would save lines and lines of code because each puzzle is different.
Besides, you always do the same thing. You say that there is no mathematical solution other than brute force because you tried and you didn't succeed. You are supposed to be the god of everything and we have to believe you? At what point did science stop being based on questioning the rest?.
The fact that you have created software by mixing all the findings of other people does not make you a wise scholar, just another programmer.
What do you think, someone who can create such a big puzzle cannot write a 4-line code?
key = '910ed3ab5775b97da1a33e38b72eba94f90addff7051f276c9d6c538c369632b'
last_index = 0
while last_index <= 255:
mask = 1 << last_index
mask_hex = mask + int(key, 16) % mask
last_index += 1
hexa = "%064x" % mask_hex
print (hexa)
It's hard to believe that they would manually write each puzzle after extracting 256 keys from HD wallet.. At first, I thought you were saying all this as a joke, but you're actually defending your point seriously, still... who knows
can't be denied that it might have been done manually
First it's a big puzzle, why? only money makes it popular, it's not that he invented the wheel, it's a simple increment of numbers, the reason why I think He don't use a script is because anyone who has sufficient knowledge of bitcoin understands the limits of ecc and the associated hashes to bitcoin.
so to begin with it made no sense at all to put 256 keys from the beginning.
And if he used a script could have used random, I don't see a logical position in using an HD wallet.
Based on that, he could have done anything crazy from then on.
It's like believing that the matches in 160 hashes have some relationship with the distribution of public keys in ECC, absurd.
But until the creator says anything, neither you nor I are right for sure.