I see some peoples here believe that high-number puzzles >100 can be solved by BSGS or
by some other method other than kangaroos. I could prove that kang is the only known way,
but when people want to believe to something - it's almost impossible to stop them.
Better save your time and don't argue, let them talk about solving #135 with BSGS, with splitting ranges, with magic scripts and circles, it's funny
by some other method other than kangaroos. I could prove that kang is the only known way,
but when people want to believe to something - it's almost impossible to stop them.
Better save your time and don't argue, let them talk about solving #135 with BSGS, with splitting ranges, with magic scripts and circles, it's funny
The only problem is that other people may end up falling for what can best be described as fantasy-land stories about breaking the bounds of classical understanding of what information is made out of. And calling those living in the actual reality as religious fanatics... I didn't invent Kangaroo, to have any reason to defend it, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be acknowledged as the only viable way to go forward, in lack of anything else. I know Darwin's law will take care of things for me though.
