Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 47. (Read 245170 times)
Just curious, So is the solver of #120, #125, #130 the same solvers or#130 is a new guy?
Can some one explain about forks, inside Bitcoin puzzle how to cash out or convert to bitcoin
Usually those forks are worthless but in any case you can make some tens bucks with them. You can use Guarda wallet (web app) to move them to another wallet. And you can use changenow.io to exchange them to bitcoin.
Thankx for info
I were looking something like strong wallet, where load privkeys and all crypto loads in one click and convert them
Can some one explain about forks, inside Bitcoin puzzle how to cash out or convert to bitcoin
Usually those forks are worthless but in any case you can make some tens bucks with them. You can use Guarda wallet (web app) to move them to another wallet. And you can use changenow.io to exchange them to bitcoin.
Can some one explain about forks, inside Bitcoin puzzle how to cash out or convert to bitcoin
Or someone simply noticed the lid does more than keep the liquid in.
I have made more progress by simply eliminating parts that it could not be, logistical analysis of key space and just some plain hands-on common sense. Real-world problem solving applied to reducing the key space by logical means. All keys with repeating prefixes, all with more than two repeating characters to list some already mentioned before. I am actively seeking puzzle solutions personally.
I have only been working on these puzzles for perhaps a year with direction and structured aim. I can only imagine what stage most of you all are at if far beyond my new presence is stumbling blindly through.
I do work with ML, tinker with special custom models in attempts to bridge the rational logic beyond the simple prediction, transformers or Berts.
Someone with the knowledge and means to code bug free model training and compile datasets upon which to aim these models.... now that, seems more likely as those able and with enough understanding could be leveraging this emerging technology which is gaining ground and establishing a stable foundation anyone dedicating the time can begin doing in some garage setup.
I'm sure after removing all those false positives. The reduced key space hardly takes a "hidden mathematical genius".
Though all my work is done, on a single graphics card on a laptop. I believe any solutions happening at this moment is due to the collimation of over four years of continual persistence and well mapped logic in isolated sectors, in calculated sub-ranges.
I have made more progress by simply eliminating parts that it could not be, logistical analysis of key space and just some plain hands-on common sense. Real-world problem solving applied to reducing the key space by logical means. All keys with repeating prefixes, all with more than two repeating characters to list some already mentioned before. I am actively seeking puzzle solutions personally.
I have only been working on these puzzles for perhaps a year with direction and structured aim. I can only imagine what stage most of you all are at if far beyond my new presence is stumbling blindly through.
I do work with ML, tinker with special custom models in attempts to bridge the rational logic beyond the simple prediction, transformers or Berts.
Someone with the knowledge and means to code bug free model training and compile datasets upon which to aim these models.... now that, seems more likely as those able and with enough understanding could be leveraging this emerging technology which is gaining ground and establishing a stable foundation anyone dedicating the time can begin doing in some garage setup.
I'm sure after removing all those false positives. The reduced key space hardly takes a "hidden mathematical genius".
Though all my work is done, on a single graphics card on a laptop. I believe any solutions happening at this moment is due to the collimation of over four years of continual persistence and well mapped logic in isolated sectors, in calculated sub-ranges.
not true for #110 and #115
I have more and more doubts that some geniuses are solving the puzzle. In my opinion, starting from the 120bit solution, the creator does all this. To keep the interest in his mystery alive. If you compare the sequence of events (dates of decisions, increase in the prize), then everything adds up to a logical picture. Now it is more profitable to use computing power for the inference of neural networks, for their training, rather than for searching for a needle in a haystack with an unknown result. And here you need very large computing power, which will cost a lot to rent.
Honestly, I don't think it was the creator who withdrew the funds. Someone who over the years didn't stop the challenge despite having the private keys - he could have withdrawn them with multi-million profits, and instead deposited dozens of BTC to each address shows that the creator is a person who sleeps on cash and is like oxygen to him - obviously he is and that he will never take it away. So I don't think that someone stopped achieving the ultimate goal of creating this challenge by fawning over change... especially since finding 120,125,130 does not bring anything positive in the perspective of the entire challenge... especially since we don't know of any solutions that he could skillfully announce while making progress towards achieving the goal.
I think the finder is someone who reads us here, but does not share the results or methods of action, because so far she has successfully gained $2 million on it using her excellent method of breaking subsequent thresholds. In other words - for safety's sake she is silent, because she simply -> plans to top up those $2 million with subsequent levels. If we live to see #160, there is a chance that we will learn the solutions.
That's what I thought at first, too. However, it is extremely doubtful that there is any "hidden mathematical genius" in the world. He would have received more money and recognition if he had made his discoveries public. I also think it is extremely stupid to use large computing resources to solve the puzzle, when they can be rented out for inference or neural network training and guaranteed to make a profit.
So the version of a great mathematician who solves puzzles in some new way on a single video card is questionable as well as the version of a businessman who prefers to play the lottery instead of a stable business. Then it remains a logical option that the creator of the puzzle (perhaps it is not one person, but an organization) stimulates the "bait" ("look, someone found the key, so it's possible!") to work on testing the security of bitcoin.
There is another option - a quantum computer and Shor's algorithm are used, then it is definitely some organization testing its power.
Or someone simply noticed the lid does more than keep the liquid in.
I have made more progress by simply eliminating parts that it could not be, logistical analysis of key space and just some plain hands-on common sense. Real-world problem solving applied to reducing the key space by logical means. All keys with repeating prefixes, all with more than two repeating characters to list some already mentioned before. I am actively seeking puzzle solutions personally.
I have only been working on these puzzles for perhaps a year with direction and structured aim. I can only imagine what stage most of you all are at if far beyond my new presence is stumbling blindly through.
I do work with ML, tinker with special custom models in attempts to bridge the rational logic beyond the simple prediction, transformers or Berts.
Someone with the knowledge and means to code bug free model training and compile datasets upon which to aim these models.... now that, seems more likely as those able and with enough understanding could be leveraging this emerging technology which is gaining ground and establishing a stable foundation anyone dedicating the time can begin doing in some garage setup.
I'm sure after removing all those false positives. The reduced key space hardly takes a "hidden mathematical genius".
Though all my work is done, on a single graphics card on a laptop. I believe any solutions happening at this moment is due to the collimation of over four years of continual persistence and well mapped logic in isolated sectors, in calculated sub-ranges.
Here is the output of one of my experiments, breaking the key space of #66 into some 25 million sub-ranges and sampling addresses after removing parts of the key space by a set of rules, coupled with several other gum-shoe insanity.
Address Range: 19FaJ7mnZ1o2bRdLWNPswW829NZ3KtkUve to 1DJjP7WMvJNZSa1nURTfPMXQP4Pjx4CZVJ
Subrange 167575:
Decimal Range: 223088402697171072894127398419995557888 to 223089728030944213908759676992704479231
Hexadecimal Range: 00000000000000000000000000000000a7d54374bc6a7ab8a000000000000000 to 00000000000000000000000000000000a7d584ccccccc88b8fffffffffffffff
Address Range: 1HPxAfdbeShoNQoLyGrMYjwX8KE3JDTgqP to 196jyzz3omwHiWx7SAUiRfD7DLeEd6dpqN
Subrange 167576:
Decimal Range: 223089728030944213908759676992704479232 to 223091053364717354923391955565413400575
Hexadecimal Range: 00000000000000000000000000000000a7d584ccccccc88b9000000000000000 to 00000000000000000000000000000000a7d5c624dd2f165e7fffffffffffffff
import os
import random
Target_Puzzle_No = 135
unde-Target_Puzzle_No = 100
k = 0
while True:
low = 2**(Target_Puzzle_No-1)
high = -1 + 2**(Target_Puzzle_No)
beween = 2**100
startnumber = random.randrange(low,high)
check = (startnumber+beween)
if startnumber > high :
break
st = hex(startnumber)[2:]
en = hex(check)[2:]
print (st,file=open("67-checklis.txt", "a"))
print (st)
os.system("timeout 20m ./vs-kangaroo-multi -v 1 -gpu -g 128,128 -bits " + st + ":" + en + " 02145d2611c823a396ef6712ce0f712f09b9b4f3135e3e0aa3230fb9b6d08d1e16 ")
k += 89
# set public key in os command
# set os command as per your kangaroo
import random
Target_Puzzle_No = 135
unde-Target_Puzzle_No = 100
k = 0
while True:
low = 2**(Target_Puzzle_No-1)
high = -1 + 2**(Target_Puzzle_No)
beween = 2**100
startnumber = random.randrange(low,high)
check = (startnumber+beween)
if startnumber > high :
break
st = hex(startnumber)[2:]
en = hex(check)[2:]
print (st,file=open("67-checklis.txt", "a"))
print (st)
os.system("timeout 20m ./vs-kangaroo-multi -v 1 -gpu -g 128,128 -bits " + st + ":" + en + " 02145d2611c823a396ef6712ce0f712f09b9b4f3135e3e0aa3230fb9b6d08d1e16 ")
k += 89
# set public key in os command
# set os command as per your kangaroo
There is another option - a quantum computer and Shor's algorithm are used, then it is definitely some organization testing its power.
" Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. "
If someone solved Puzzle 130, then holy molly, they’ve got a supercomputer the size of a small moon! But wait — no one’s got one of those lying around (unless NASA’s hiding something). So, if no one solved Puzzle 130, holy molly, something fishy’s going on — maybe the puzzle fairies had a little too much coffee and fancy lunches in Dubai! 
Come on, let's get real. I myself computed that if I had 150k $ lying around I would have solved 130 in less than 90 days. Simple crude math - divide total ops by number of op/s, again by ops/GPU/s, multiply with price/h.
So no supercomputer required here, just $ to pay for the most optimized piece of software to run, to minimize costs.
But now 135 requires 5 times more money to solve, or for GPU prices to go down, or for performance per $ to go up, which WILL happen. What I do not understand, is what the deal is with the 3Emi script address, is it a group, is it some sort of smart contract, why was it not spent already, etc.
I have more and more doubts that some geniuses are solving the puzzle. In my opinion, starting from the 120bit solution, the creator does all this. To keep the interest in his mystery alive. If you compare the sequence of events (dates of decisions, increase in the prize), then everything adds up to a logical picture. Now it is more profitable to use computing power for the inference of neural networks, for their training, rather than for searching for a needle in a haystack with an unknown result. And here you need very large computing power, which will cost a lot to rent.
Honestly, I don't think it was the creator who withdrew the funds. Someone who over the years didn't stop the challenge despite having the private keys - he could have withdrawn them with multi-million profits, and instead deposited dozens of BTC to each address shows that the creator is a person who sleeps on cash and is like oxygen to him - obviously he is and that he will never take it away. So I don't think that someone stopped achieving the ultimate goal of creating this challenge by fawning over change... especially since finding 120,125,130 does not bring anything positive in the perspective of the entire challenge... especially since we don't know of any solutions that he could skillfully announce while making progress towards achieving the goal.
I think the finder is someone who reads us here, but does not share the results or methods of action, because so far she has successfully gained $2 million on it using her excellent method of breaking subsequent thresholds. In other words - for safety's sake she is silent, because she simply -> plans to top up those $2 million with subsequent levels. If we live to see #160, there is a chance that we will learn the solutions.
That's what I thought at first, too. However, it is extremely doubtful that there is any "hidden mathematical genius" in the world. He would have received more money and recognition if he had made his discoveries public. I also think it is extremely stupid to use large computing resources to solve the puzzle, when they can be rented out for inference or neural network training and guaranteed to make a profit.
So the version of a great mathematician who solves puzzles in some new way on a single video card is questionable as well as the version of a businessman who prefers to play the lottery instead of a stable business. Then it remains a logical option that the creator of the puzzle (perhaps it is not one person, but an organization) stimulates the "bait" ("look, someone found the key, so it's possible!") to work on testing the security of bitcoin.
There is another option - a quantum computer and Shor's algorithm are used, then it is definitely some organization testing its power.
If (someone solves Puzzle 130) -> (they have extreme computational resources).
Not (anyone has extreme computational resources).
Therefore, Not (anyone solved Puzzle 130) -> it may have been manipulated.
Not (anyone has extreme computational resources).
Therefore, Not (anyone solved Puzzle 130) -> it may have been manipulated.
If someone solved Puzzle 130, then holy molly, they’ve got a supercomputer the size of a small moon! But wait — no one’s got one of those lying around (unless NASA’s hiding something). So, if no one solved Puzzle 130, holy molly, something fishy’s going on — maybe the puzzle fairies had a little too much coffee and fancy lunches in Dubai!
Greetings to Everyone here. I hope to add my small contribution and knowledge to these pages, I am ExiledDatum.
Welcome, ExiledDatum! We're glad to have you here.
It is a shame to observe some of the blatant entropy spewed to hinder others out of greed.
Thank you to Alberto, NoMachine, and many others who have contributed so much to these endeavors. I have learned a great deal from many of you who so willingly shared your code, time and very essence while working on this puzzle.
I have also been afflicted with the obsession of plinking away at the code, tearing it apart at the bit in hopes to glimpse the true clockwork beneath. I can see the draw which has held many of you here for so long observing.
Imagine my own anger with myself after finding out #66 has been solved and going back over the many terrabytes of code I have horded, scrapped and reconstructed across this thread well into a third restart. My hypothesis had placed me within 2**61 or less of the key. An going back over my bat files and clutters external drives stuffed to the brim with my attempts.
I had calculated 2628a3ad7d90cd20f to 2728ad7d90cd20f. I had sitting in a bat file created and last ran 5/13/2024.
I agree with many and none of the findings here.
Perhaps it is part of my unique approach... preferring to bash myself upon the rocks while learning to swim after leaping into the sea that these puzzles represent. While thrashing away in my inadequate mind at this, and many other puzzles. I have discovered a few things. Alberto has probably also and is why he is still here to observe. I will with-hold my many hypotheses and the likes as I am a woefully ignorant newcomer, but I am observant.
While there is no pattern as the author clearly stated, he did have a system in which he used to generate the keys, and how clever and simple it was hidden is plain sight. I almost missed it myself, but kept rounding back to it.
There is no pattern, but all beings are creatures of habit. Don't waste your time on seeking the pattern. It is pointless at this size of key space. Leverage your ingenuity, cunning and logic. Stop blind skips into the key space, look for habit, not pattern. #66 broke many of the rules the author seemed to have kept to, no repeating characters greater than two. No repeated string lengths. The vast keyspace size now protects the prizes, not some cleverly constructed riddle or system to solve.
I am here to offer what the author secretly wished to set about and construct with his double puzzle. This puzzle is not just about cracking the entropy. It is about cracking the human condition, there are keen minds here and the blockchain is power.
Smart-contracts written and publicly audited could govern the key space search server, so blind trust is removed. True equality could be possible. I reference Alberto mostly because he has the most work along with WanderingPhilosopher, there are most likely others I miss, and forgive my ignorance.
Understand those people gave openly and freely shared with all so everyone was given equal chance.
Thank you, to those who gave openly because they understood this concept so well.
To those dreaming, I say dream, but understand. You must give before others learn to give also. It one of the strangest paradoxes. No one will share until you decide to teach them how to share.
If you all would stop searching in single castles with vaults empty waiting for the prize while dreaming, this puzzle would crumble in a few months under true collaboration.
Truly come together and work as a team. I see several small groups within these pages, islands of brilliant minds drawn to one another.
But, what do I know. I am just some old man to the party. A SimpleMind.
Greetings to Everyone here. I hope to add my small contribution and knowledge to these pages, I am ExiledDatum.
Thank you to Alberto, NoMachine, and many others who have contributed so much to these endeavors. I have learned a great deal from many of you who so willingly shared your code, time and very essence while working on this puzzle.
I have also been afflicted with the obsession of plinking away at the code, tearing it apart at the bit in hopes to glimpse the true clockwork beneath. I can see the draw which has held many of you here for so long observing.
Imagine my own anger with myself after finding out #66 has been solved and going back over the many terrabytes of code I have horded, scrapped and reconstructed across this thread well into a third restart. My hypothesis had placed me within 2**61 or less of the key. An going back over my bat files and clutters external drives stuffed to the brim with my attempts.
I had calculated 2628a3ad7d90cd20f to 2728ad7d90cd20f. I had sitting in a bat file created and last ran 5/13/2024.
I agree with many and none of the findings here.
Perhaps it is part of my unique approach... preferring to bash myself upon the rocks while learning to swim after leaping into the sea that these puzzles represent. While thrashing away in my inadequate mind at this, and many other puzzles. I have discovered a few things. Alberto has probably also and is why he is still here to observe. I will with-hold my many hypotheses and the likes as I am a woefully ignorant newcomer, but I am observant.
While there is no pattern as the author clearly stated, he did have a system in which he used to generate the keys, and how clever and simple it was hidden is plain sight. I almost missed it myself, but kept rounding back to it.
There is no pattern, but all beings are creatures of habit. Don't waste your time on seeking the pattern. It is pointless at this size of key space. Leverage your ingenuity, cunning and logic. Stop blind skips into the key space, look for habit, not pattern. #66 broke many of the rules the author seemed to have kept to, no repeating characters greater than two. No repeated string lengths. The vast keyspace size now protects the prizes, not some cleverly constructed riddle or system to solve.
I am here to offer what the author secretly wished to set about and construct with his double puzzle. This puzzle is not just about cracking the entropy. It is about cracking the human condition, there are keen minds here and the blockchain is power.
Smart-contracts written and publicly audited could govern the key space search server, so blind trust is removed. True equality could be possible. I reference Alberto mostly because he has the most work along with WanderingPhilosopher, there are most likely others I miss, and forgive my ignorance.
Understand those people gave openly and freely shared with all so everyone was given equal chance.
Thank you, to those who gave openly because they understood this concept so well.
To those dreaming, I say dream, but understand. You must give before others learn to give also. It one of the strangest paradoxes. No one will share until you decide to teach them how to share.
If you all would stop searching in single castles with vaults empty waiting for the prize while dreaming, this puzzle would crumble in a few months under true collaboration.
Truly come together and work as a team. I see several small groups within these pages, islands of brilliant minds drawn to one another.
But, what do I know. I am just some old man to the party. A SimpleMind.
Greetings to Everyone here. I hope to add my small contribution and knowledge to these pages, I am ExiledDatum.
I agree with Akito that the creator of this puzzle moved out puzzles 120, 125, and 130. I have been researching this topic for a long time, and based on my analysis, just after puzzle 120 was solved on 2023-02-27, the creator increased the prize money to a total of 1000 BTC on 2023-04-16. This seemed to be a public stunt by the creator to draw more attention to the puzzle. Then, on 2023-07-09, puzzle 125 was removed again, likely as another public stunt to generate further discussion and speculation that someone had gained the knowledge to crack ECDSA within a 3-4 month period. After that, when puzzle 66 was solved and subsequently stolen by another pseudo person (I’m unsure if this was also a public stunt), the creator quickly moved btc of puzzle 130, likely to attract even more attention.
I don’t mean to offend anyone—this is just my analysis. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and this is simply mine. I have no intention of offending anyone.
I don’t mean to offend anyone—this is just my analysis. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and this is simply mine. I have no intention of offending anyone.
This could be true but from the other hand why he would do that ? You said his goal is to draw more attention. I don't think so. This whole puzzle thing is very niche topic, normal people don't care whatever he will do here... and moving puzzles like 120 125 130 and 66 makes the whole thing even more unaccessible to average person due to obvious hardware limitations.
He stated clearly what this "puzzle" really is: it's meant to measure what can be cracked at current time, He doesn't care who takes the bitcoins or how it was done or if someone stole the transaction. All he cares about is current cracking capabilities. As if someone is monitoring if increasing bitcoin security is necessary.
I think the "creator" is not a random private person. It represents someone who have important goal in knowledge how safe bitcoin is currently. This is someone who created BTC, big exchange or something like this.
How many people you know that instead of cashing it all or at least holding would make a puzzle and play such game ? And if someone has thousands of bitcoins and this is just a part of them why would he even bother to make such puzzle ? I tell you it's not a single private person and he is not moving the puzzles himself.
I don’t mean to offend anyone—this is just my analysis. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and this is simply mine. I have no intention of offending anyone.
I'm a mathematician. I deal with logic - a part of mathematics.
Formulating the Argument.
Steps for a logical analysis:
Formalize the claims: The main claims can be expressed as premises in logic:
Premise 1: After puzzle 120 was solved, the creator increased the prize money on 2023-04-16 to 1000 BTC (public stunt hypothesis).
Premise 2: Puzzle 125 was removed on 2023-07-09, likely as another stunt (further public manipulation hypothesis).
Premise 3: Puzzle 130 was moved after the solving of puzzle 66, likely to generate more attention.
Premise 4: It is practically impossible to solve puzzle 130 without at least 1000 GPUs, making it improbable for anyone to solve it legitimately.
Logical Conclusion:
Using modus tollens (if P implies Q, and Q is false, then P must be false):
If it is true that solving Puzzle 130 is only possible with extreme computational resources (Premise 4), and no one is known to possess those resources, then no one could have solved it without manipulation.
The formula could look like:
If (someone solves Puzzle 130) -> (they have extreme computational resources).
Not (anyone has extreme computational resources).
Therefore, Not (anyone solved Puzzle 130) -> it may have been manipulated.
This reasoning framework doesn't "prove" the manipulation but shows that, given the constraints, the likelihood of a public stunt increases if the technical requirements are realistically impossible for most individuals.
I agree with Akito that the creator of this puzzle moved out puzzles 120, 125, and 130. I have been researching this topic for a long time, and based on my analysis, just after puzzle 120 was solved on 2023-02-27, the creator increased the prize money to a total of 1000 BTC on 2023-04-16. This seemed to be a public stunt by the creator to draw more attention to the puzzle. Then, on 2023-07-09, puzzle 125 was removed again, likely as another public stunt to generate further discussion and speculation that someone had gained the knowledge to crack ECDSA within a 3-4 month period. After that, when puzzle 66 was solved and subsequently stolen by another pseudo person (I’m unsure if this was also a public stunt), the creator quickly moved btc of puzzle 130, likely to attract even more attention.
I don’t mean to offend anyone—this is just my analysis. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and this is simply mine. I have no intention of offending anyone.
I don’t mean to offend anyone—this is just my analysis. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and this is simply mine. I have no intention of offending anyone.
If it is not zielar or JLP, then it only means that the creator decided to do with his keys what he wants and when he wants.
How the fuck do you reach these conclusions, Based on what evidence?
There is NO EVIDENCE in one way or in the other. Those are only your opinion.
Please stop spreading FUD
Sometimes I don't know when you are serious or joking or just provoking
I've tried everything I or anyone else could think of, but nothing seems to work. Honestly, I don't know what I might have missed. I'm just kidding in some parts of the topic, mostly out of frustration, but it's all part of the challenge. The truth is, no matter how much effort we put in, it's practically impossible to crack this—or it would take more computing power than the world has to break.
If it is not zielar or JLP, then it only means that the creator decided to do with his keys what he wants and when he wants.
Only the state or intelligence agencies can have such resources.
The public program on GitHub could serve as a honeypot, used to monitor those trying to solve cryptographic puzzles or who are interested in cracking ECDSA. It could act as a form of surveillance, watching who interacts with it, akin to government efforts to track those with knowledge of or interest in sensitive cryptographic topics.
The non-public solution could indicate that powerful entities (e.g., intelligence agencies, corporations) are exploiting vulnerabilities privately while letting the public chase dead ends or false leads.
The decision to not touch the funds could simply be a matter of operational security.
Sometimes I don't know when you are serious or joking or just provoking , but this is one of the more accurate posts here.
It is very possible that the creator is part of an institution or agency.
The numbers involved are astronomical—comparable to the size of the entire universe. It would take advanced quantum computing, and even then, only an exceptionally powerful one, to crack this puzzles without the public key.
Only the state or intelligence agencies can have such resources.
We don't even know if there is yet some unpublished weakness in ECDSA that was exploited. Also why would one gather 1.7 million $ in a single script address and not touch it at all after more than a year and a half, assuming there was a high cost of solving, that needs to be paid...?
The public program on GitHub could serve as a honeypot, used to monitor those trying to solve cryptographic puzzles or who are interested in cracking ECDSA. It could act as a form of surveillance, watching who interacts with it, akin to government efforts to track those with knowledge of or interest in sensitive cryptographic topics.
The non-public solution could indicate that powerful entities (e.g., intelligence agencies, corporations) are exploiting vulnerabilities privately while letting the public chase dead ends or false leads.
The decision to not touch the funds could simply be a matter of operational security.
Sometimes I don't know when you are serious or joking or just provoking , but this is one of the more accurate posts here.
It is very possible that the creator is part of an institution or agency.
Due to the fact that a lot has changed in the topic recently - for fun I decided to read what you are writing about IN THIS TOPIC, but in order not to waste too much time - I started from page 300 of this topic and:
COBRAS - I won't address the whining gibberish of this idiot because it's a waste of space here. Man, do something useful... go pick up trash in the forest or go clean up in church, because you'll contribute more there than here, spouting nonsense in every post. In relation to everything this trash posts, I can say that he knows more about me than I do about myself :-) And even more about this challenge. Write a code in Python to get your brain in order, but start with the line that creates it... apart from the COBRAS mental disability - for your satisfaction I state referring to individual posts:
Companies that use a large number of GPUs, especially at the scale of 20,000 or more
1.Google
2.Amazon (AWS)
3.NVIDIA
4.Meta (Facebook)
5.Tesla: Tesla Dojo
6.Cryptocurrency Mining Farms
In which company do you think it is possible to solve puzzle 130 unnoticed from the list above?
Do you still have doubts that it wasn't this person who decided https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51803085
That's right. At that time I had the opportunity and permission to use very large computing power at that time... The company knew about it - otherwise I wouldn't brag about it. That power is a grain in the sand today... None of the companies mentioned are correct :-)
====
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62181304
With 8x Tesla A100 ? I have 6 in my lab. I haven't found anything so far. It's not just about the GPUs here.
Something else is happening here.
Maybe he/she is just a brilliant mind...and that person knows a way to reuse the DPs from 120,125 to find 130 and the rest.
I would like to know how he/she did it !
As far as I know - such a possibility has always existed :-) However, I do not have a perfect mind to use it... especially since I have no progress in those ranges. I have a set from the 115 range, so if someone wants - I am open to suggestions.
====
You are right about the attack. However about 3Emi, I do not think so, that transaction you shared does not belong to 3Emi, it belongs to a lamer, a noob, a very beginner who does not know anything.
And for you guys, I shared in older posts a script where you can immediately move BTC from one wallet to another. Use those kind of proper and reliable script to move when you solve any puzzle. Also, move whole balance all in once, because while waiting small amount of transfer to be moved (testing if btc is going), hackers start slowing and solves the private key from the exposed public key in 4-5 minutes for the small numbers like the puzzle #67.
And that's what I was writing about. This challenge ended when I made public the solution to puzzle #115. Later "additional payments" of a few BTC to the address and "nobody's" solutions not made public are a different game... The game is about who will rob whom and how... and why in the first place? That's why I approach the topic with a great deal of distance, because in the perspective of time - facts and time have shown that TODAY no one will honestly get rich on this game just by trying to find a solution.
====
Of course, that is JLP himself, but apparently not with the GitHub version of Kangaroo 2.2.
This is version 8.0 at least.
How do you know it is JLP ?
Because when it comes to solving 130-bit, even the Kangaroo needs a turbo boost... and JLP's got the keys to the garage!
I know from JLP himself that he is not working on this project because he simply does not have time for it. His profession is closely related to some exact science and is a really serious profession, and such a side project used to be an element of training in light of what he does professionally. I do not think that this will change in the long run, especially since #115 when I tried to take on #120 - then he had much less time and contact was very difficult due to lack of time. I do not think that he read it at all or that anything about this challenge interests him at the moment, although it may have changed, because I last wrote to him a year ago. Certainly all of the above -> excludes JLP as having found the solution using his "improved" work... and I am certainly convinced that if it were completely the other way around -> he would have made the solution known to us.
====
Believe me or not - but I've been thinking about it for two days
And I suspect that this will happen for two reasons:
Logical - because the facts known to us today show how difficult this achievement is and it will have the task of stopping and encouraging those who have doubted to act, and it will contribute a lot
Obvious - because we will never know the finder and the method, and the funds will be officially "stolen" by a person who has nothing to do with finding a solution, because they either knew it from the beginning or they will prey on someone who will do it for them.
====
Another scumbag who is coming after me because he is sad that I succeeded in and have a big part in this challenge. If you don't know, don't give a damn!
1. The last solution I found with JLP is #115
2. JLP refused to accept compensation for a joint achievement... Then he said that if I wanted to take on #120 and he would find time to help me with it - then he would agree.
3. Don't cry.... it won't lead to any benefit for you. No one will give you anything to wipe your tears every time you cry... just like I have no obligation to give money to everyone I see around me. Following your train of thought, choosing your wrong criterion for assessing my person online -> a cleaner in the yard should I donate for not walking around dirty, support BMW with a donation because their car allows me to move around mobile, and also support MICROSOFT because thanks to them you can see on the screen what I type on the keyboard?
And what.. are you bald?
====
I know... I wasn't supposed to relate, but this is beyond me. What an idiot Wake up!! We're getting up!! You wet yourself!! 
====
Honestly, I don't think it was the creator who withdrew the funds. Someone who over the years didn't stop the challenge despite having the private keys - he could have withdrawn them with multi-million profits, and instead deposited dozens of BTC to each address shows that the creator is a person who sleeps on cash and is like oxygen to him - obviously he is and that he will never take it away. So I don't think that someone stopped achieving the ultimate goal of creating this challenge by fawning over change... especially since finding 120,125,130 does not bring anything positive in the perspective of the entire challenge... especially since we don't know of any solutions that he could skillfully announce while making progress towards achieving the goal.
I think the finder is someone who reads us here, but does not share the results or methods of action, because so far she has successfully gained $2 million on it using her excellent method of breaking subsequent thresholds. In other words - for safety's sake she is silent, because she simply -> plans to top up those $2 million with subsequent levels. If we live to see #160, there is a chance that we will learn the solutions.
====
#64 and #66 - these levels are no longer related to anything that requires research and technology. These levels and their solutions are the result of robbing people of their computing power by assuring them of sharing the profits if a solution is found. In both cases, this sharing did not happen, because no one admitted to finding a solution, despite the fact that the pool achieved significant effects. The only thing that connects low thresholds with high ones is that no one admitted to finding a solution, and the difference is that there is no goal in this - because using a kangaroo for low thresholds is comparable to flushing a toilet or having a brain by COBRAS... that's why we know these solutions. The lack of a lucky person shows that the thief simply did not intend to share the profit from the stolen power, because as we know, he did not have to... after all, everyone gave it to him, believing on their word of honor that if we find it, we would share it
----
O.M.G. 10 forum pages, a few references and two hours in the ass That's enough.
IN SUM:
I am also not the finder of any solution since finding 115 with JeanLucPons. I would like to point out that all successes with the included private key and description of the method of finding were made available to you on the same day it happened, while all solutions later than the one achieved when we found 115 were not made public, which indicates that we are dealing with theft, fraud and scheming of the RBC type or open theft of power by creating fictitious pools.
Greetings to all (excluding COBRAS, because it's no one and not everyone
)
COBRAS - I won't address the whining gibberish of this idiot because it's a waste of space here. Man, do something useful... go pick up trash in the forest or go clean up in church, because you'll contribute more there than here, spouting nonsense in every post. In relation to everything this trash posts, I can say that he knows more about me than I do about myself :-) And even more about this challenge. Write a code in Python to get your brain in order, but start with the line that creates it... apart from the COBRAS mental disability - for your satisfaction I state referring to individual posts:
hi i think this is user zielar https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/zielar-1020539 taking 120 125 130 he works in a company where there are many gpus i think the company doesn't know that he is using their equipment
Companies that use a large number of GPUs, especially at the scale of 20,000 or more
1.Google
2.Amazon (AWS)
3.NVIDIA
4.Meta (Facebook)
5.Tesla: Tesla Dojo
6.Cryptocurrency Mining Farms
In which company do you think it is possible to solve puzzle 130 unnoticed from the list above?
Do you still have doubts that it wasn't this person who decided https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51803085
That's right. At that time I had the opportunity and permission to use very large computing power at that time... The company knew about it - otherwise I wouldn't brag about it. That power is a grain in the sand today... None of the companies mentioned are correct :-)
====
Do you still have doubts that it wasn't this person who decided https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51803085
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62181304
With 8x Tesla A100 ? I have 6 in my lab. I haven't found anything so far. It's not just about the GPUs here.
Something else is happening here.
Maybe he/she is just a brilliant mind...and that person knows a way to reuse the DPs from 120,125 to find 130 and the rest.
I would like to know how he/she did it !
As far as I know - such a possibility has always existed :-) However, I do not have a perfect mind to use it... especially since I have no progress in those ranges. I have a set from the 115 range, so if someone wants - I am open to suggestions.
====
120, 125 and 130.
captured by hacker ? because this address is 1DiegoU6ETJXK9hNWVTeuK4Y8fkksPnEnK seem fishy with 3Emiwzxme7Mrj4d89uqohXNncnRM15YESs
and he's announce this "https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/69888f5e55d414b8de65f3a9307a1f414d7035cf9142239045300ce018984bd4"
the next target to take and spend.
{
"address": "1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9",
"pkscript": "76a914739437bb3dd6d1983e66629c5f08c70e5276937188ac",
"value": 1231,
"spent": false,
"spender": null
},
it's 67, anyone who can find even 67, the transactions will be attacked by this person.
ngl, this guy very smart and genius build the transaction and from the number of transactions increasing slowly and rhythmically.
captured by hacker ? because this address is 1DiegoU6ETJXK9hNWVTeuK4Y8fkksPnEnK seem fishy with 3Emiwzxme7Mrj4d89uqohXNncnRM15YESs
and he's announce this "https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/69888f5e55d414b8de65f3a9307a1f414d7035cf9142239045300ce018984bd4"
the next target to take and spend.
{
"address": "1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9",
"pkscript": "76a914739437bb3dd6d1983e66629c5f08c70e5276937188ac",
"value": 1231,
"spent": false,
"spender": null
},
it's 67, anyone who can find even 67, the transactions will be attacked by this person.
ngl, this guy very smart and genius build the transaction and from the number of transactions increasing slowly and rhythmically.
You are right about the attack. However about 3Emi, I do not think so, that transaction you shared does not belong to 3Emi, it belongs to a lamer, a noob, a very beginner who does not know anything.
And for you guys, I shared in older posts a script where you can immediately move BTC from one wallet to another. Use those kind of proper and reliable script to move when you solve any puzzle. Also, move whole balance all in once, because while waiting small amount of transfer to be moved (testing if btc is going), hackers start slowing and solves the private key from the exposed public key in 4-5 minutes for the small numbers like the puzzle #67.
And that's what I was writing about. This challenge ended when I made public the solution to puzzle #115. Later "additional payments" of a few BTC to the address and "nobody's" solutions not made public are a different game... The game is about who will rob whom and how... and why in the first place? That's why I approach the topic with a great deal of distance, because in the perspective of time - facts and time have shown that TODAY no one will honestly get rich on this game just by trying to find a solution.
====
Damn!!! whoever the solver of 130 bit is. is genius..!!!
Of course, that is JLP himself, but apparently not with the GitHub version of Kangaroo 2.2.
This is version 8.0 at least.
How do you know it is JLP ?
Because when it comes to solving 130-bit, even the Kangaroo needs a turbo boost... and JLP's got the keys to the garage!
I know from JLP himself that he is not working on this project because he simply does not have time for it. His profession is closely related to some exact science and is a really serious profession, and such a side project used to be an element of training in light of what he does professionally. I do not think that this will change in the long run, especially since #115 when I tried to take on #120 - then he had much less time and contact was very difficult due to lack of time. I do not think that he read it at all or that anything about this challenge interests him at the moment, although it may have changed, because I last wrote to him a year ago. Certainly all of the above -> excludes JLP as having found the solution using his "improved" work... and I am certainly convinced that if it were completely the other way around -> he would have made the solution known to us.
====
Maybe you all remember
When puzzle 64 and 120 found right after puzzle listed prices fill up with high amount
6.6 from 0.6
13 from 1.3
Do you all think maybe this time puzzle 66 and 130 found same old 64 and 120
And price may be goesmore up like
Example
67 from 6.7
135 from 13.5
Wait and see or ask puzzle Creator for more updates
When puzzle 64 and 120 found right after puzzle listed prices fill up with high amount
6.6 from 0.6
13 from 1.3
Do you all think maybe this time puzzle 66 and 130 found same old 64 and 120
And price may be goesmore up like
Example
67 from 6.7
135 from 13.5
Wait and see or ask puzzle Creator for more updates
Believe me or not - but I've been thinking about it for two days
And I suspect that this will happen for two reasons:Logical - because the facts known to us today show how difficult this achievement is and it will have the task of stopping and encouraging those who have doubted to act, and it will contribute a lot
Obvious - because we will never know the finder and the method, and the funds will be officially "stolen" by a person who has nothing to do with finding a solution, because they either knew it from the beginning or they will prey on someone who will do it for them.
====
Current solver(s) just don't care about this thread. They have many, many GPUs and just take the BTC as a little bonus. Maybe they are criminal hackers.
Thanks to french idiot JLP for giving the sourcecode for free to all them.
Might be some chinese or north korean guys. Some place where energy costs nothing or maybe every GPU is hacked.
It is very unlikely that there is a new algorithm to solve the ECDLP. Else we might expect more frequent solves and maybe a new scientific paper.
It is game over for normal guys if you not find a real new approach to cracking the ECDLP.
Zielar had access to many GPUs but I doubt he had access to that many. But he might have solved it somehow anyway. He is a very greedy/selfish person who never gave anything back to JLP, brichard19 or others.
====Thanks to french idiot JLP for giving the sourcecode for free to all them.
Might be some chinese or north korean guys. Some place where energy costs nothing or maybe every GPU is hacked.
It is very unlikely that there is a new algorithm to solve the ECDLP. Else we might expect more frequent solves and maybe a new scientific paper.
It is game over for normal guys if you not find a real new approach to cracking the ECDLP.
Zielar had access to many GPUs but I doubt he had access to that many. But he might have solved it somehow anyway. He is a very greedy/selfish person who never gave anything back to JLP, brichard19 or others.
Another scumbag who is coming after me because he is sad that I succeeded in and have a big part in this challenge. If you don't know, don't give a damn!
1. The last solution I found with JLP is #115
2. JLP refused to accept compensation for a joint achievement... Then he said that if I wanted to take on #120 and he would find time to help me with it - then he would agree.
3. Don't cry.... it won't lead to any benefit for you. No one will give you anything to wipe your tears every time you cry... just like I have no obligation to give money to everyone I see around me. Following your train of thought, choosing your wrong criterion for assessing my person online -> a cleaner in the yard should I donate for not walking around dirty, support BMW with a donation because their car allows me to move around mobile, and also support MICROSOFT because thanks to them you can see on the screen what I type on the keyboard?
And what.. are you bald?
====
pubkey new down....
...
cf4863281bb44f52677de8876600000000 10000
c1d204c36910280a6e0952c00000000000 111c80
bad8afea76b82aa806c0d19a8000000000 11c000
aeb619ed70bba24a4d8dd0000000000000 12fb9e <-
ae8dccc375a55045649fec3c2000000000 130000
...
a3379838c4438008c873a4000000000000 1451d8
...
up down ,up down... new down...up down ,up down...
to be continue
ps needs stock of zero's for this manipulations
...
cf4863281bb44f52677de8876600000000 10000
c1d204c36910280a6e0952c00000000000 111c80
bad8afea76b82aa806c0d19a8000000000 11c000
aeb619ed70bba24a4d8dd0000000000000 12fb9e <-
ae8dccc375a55045649fec3c2000000000 130000
...
a3379838c4438008c873a4000000000000 1451d8
...
up down ,up down... new down...up down ,up down...
to be continue
ps needs stock of zero's for this manipulations
I know... I wasn't supposed to relate, but this is beyond me. What an idiot
Wake up!! We're getting up!! You wet yourself!! ====
I have more and more doubts that some geniuses are solving the puzzle. In my opinion, starting from the 120bit solution, the creator does all this. To keep the interest in his mystery alive. If you compare the sequence of events (dates of decisions, increase in the prize), then everything adds up to a logical picture. Now it is more profitable to use computing power for the inference of neural networks, for their training, rather than for searching for a needle in a haystack with an unknown result. And here you need very large computing power, which will cost a lot to rent.
Honestly, I don't think it was the creator who withdrew the funds. Someone who over the years didn't stop the challenge despite having the private keys - he could have withdrawn them with multi-million profits, and instead deposited dozens of BTC to each address shows that the creator is a person who sleeps on cash and is like oxygen to him - obviously he is and that he will never take it away. So I don't think that someone stopped achieving the ultimate goal of creating this challenge by fawning over change... especially since finding 120,125,130 does not bring anything positive in the perspective of the entire challenge... especially since we don't know of any solutions that he could skillfully announce while making progress towards achieving the goal.
I think the finder is someone who reads us here, but does not share the results or methods of action, because so far she has successfully gained $2 million on it using her excellent method of breaking subsequent thresholds. In other words - for safety's sake she is silent, because she simply -> plans to top up those $2 million with subsequent levels. If we live to see #160, there is a chance that we will learn the solutions.
====
I have
more and more doubts that some geniuses are solving the puzzle. In my opinion, starting from the 120bit solution, the creator does all this. To keep the interest in his mystery alive. If you compare the sequence of events (dates of decisions, increase in the prize), then everything adds up to a logical picture. Now it is more profitable to use computing power for the inference of neural networks, for their training, rather than for searching for a needle in a haystack with an unknown result. And here you need very large computing power, which will cost a lot to rent.
I've been saying this for a long time, but people keep rushing blindly, like a donkey chasing a carrot! Puzzles 120, 125, 130 have all been emptied by the creator, and possibly Puzzle 66 as well, intercepted by him to cover his tracks. Puzzle 66 was broadcast just moments before the next block was mined.more and more doubts that some geniuses are solving the puzzle. In my opinion, starting from the 120bit solution, the creator does all this. To keep the interest in his mystery alive. If you compare the sequence of events (dates of decisions, increase in the prize), then everything adds up to a logical picture. Now it is more profitable to use computing power for the inference of neural networks, for their training, rather than for searching for a needle in a haystack with an unknown result. And here you need very large computing power, which will cost a lot to rent.
#64 and #66 - these levels are no longer related to anything that requires research and technology. These levels and their solutions are the result of robbing people of their computing power by assuring them of sharing the profits if a solution is found. In both cases, this sharing did not happen, because no one admitted to finding a solution, despite the fact that the pool achieved significant effects. The only thing that connects low thresholds with high ones is that no one admitted to finding a solution, and the difference is that there is no goal in this - because using a kangaroo for low thresholds is comparable to flushing a toilet or having a brain by COBRAS... that's why we know these solutions. The lack of a lucky person shows that the thief simply did not intend to share the profit from the stolen power, because as we know, he did not have to... after all, everyone gave it to him, believing on their word of honor that if we find it, we would share it
----
O.M.G. 10 forum pages, a few references and two hours in the ass
That's enough.IN SUM:
I am also not the finder of any solution since finding 115 with JeanLucPons. I would like to point out that all successes with the included private key and description of the method of finding were made available to you on the same day it happened, while all solutions later than the one achieved when we found 115 were not made public, which indicates that we are dealing with theft, fraud and scheming of the RBC type or open theft of power by creating fictitious pools.
Greetings to all (excluding COBRAS, because it's no one and not everyone
) Im not understand what this code doing
while rnd(817190); return;
while rnd(817190); return;
Your code samples 14 elements from a set of 23, and stops when it matches the desired combination, what is not to understand here, or do you not understand your own posted code?
comb(23, 14) = 817190
so on average the loop will run 817190 times until it finds the match.
wre you get from 23 to 14 ?
yes [40, 38, 35, 34, 33, 32, 29, 27, 25, 24, 22, 20, 19, 18] 1238261
random find it in 1238261 this is 10 times faster then my second script
inpuT 0x33d28c937a4b0ac7e33d57d6b0217789a
result -W; 0x1d16de1a73780 189 i 1 input 0x57449a4f5a683 zGood 3 Zz 115
zzzzzGOOD 3 resultGood 0x1d16de1a73780 valid 115 1 zzTotal 115 one 5 17 thre 64 115 ddd-Fake 64 zGood 3
input -W: 0x57449a4f5a683 PP 115
Iiiii 1 s 0x1 0x1d16de1a73780 0x1d16de1a73780 0x1d16de1a73780
combo 233224241413322334324242434124242333224233414223413 51
input priv:
0x33d28c937a4b0ac7e33d57d6b0217789a
combo is a sequence from [1..4] pcs 51 times
combo:
233224241413322334324242434124242333224233414223413
this is a 2**50 result:
0x1d16de1a73780
to Zeblaro/b] - Im ignore you, don't waste your time to write yours stoopid massages.
, baby, you need some time use devise what named head , not jast put GPUs of your frinds to puzzles without result forget about Zeblaro, hi is not in a game more, GPU of his frinds not upgraded, so hi outside puzzle 130 + ))) Hj is very dissapointed, we need understan his bad news. By by Zaeblaro .
Jump to: