Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 60. (Read 245054 times)

jr. member
Activity: 79
Merit: 1
PROOF #1 RANGE 95

1237940039285380274899124223 -- upper ranges key

868012190417726402719548863 <- actual priv key  Huh

848970019642690143254478847 -> scaled for sequence start  Shocked

PROOF # 2 RANGE 100

1267650600228229401496703205375 -- upper ranges key

868221233689326498340379183142 <- actual priv key  Huh

863825300114114781320059027455 -> scaled for sequence start  Shocked

PROOF # 3 RANGE 105

40564819207303340847894502572031 -- upper ranges key

29083230144918045706788529192435 <- actual priv key  Huh

25282409603651667990095585083391 -> scaled for sequence start  Shocked

this decimal from priv key was used for learn to scaled down the ranges, and i'll make some precision to these math.
sorry if i'm not provide the formula to this.

Just still same, if doin search with CPU, it takes whole time to hit the correct privkey.
member
Activity: 239
Merit: 53
New ideas will be criticized and then admired.
I have posted a new idea for searching for pubkeys, I hope it can be of some use to you, greetings.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ultra-lightweight-database-with-public-keys-for-puzzle-btc-5509916
member
Activity: 194
Merit: 14
I am assuming, that the creator of the puzzle is very very aware of what is going on here and is between us. I also assume, that puzzle 66 was not solved by anyone, but rather the creator himself did reveal it's private key after it's probably was taken by bots, to see test if bots are actually a threat for solved low-bits puzzles.

So i will not be surprised if we see puzzle 67 also out of no where gets it's private key revealed after sometime by the creator, sooner or later.

Mark my words.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0

Can you share the address of puzzle 67 that starts with bc and 3. I don't know how to find it. Someone previously shared the address for puzzle 66 that starts with bc and 3. Can you share it for puzzle 67 too?
bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
__https://i.imgur.com/reTwOd9.png

For puzzle 67 on website we can see the same address:

Code:
Bitcoin:
W bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
0  0  0

but how can we find the other addresses that have the same private key for bitcoin like we have for puzzle 66 without having the private key?

Code:
Bitcoin:
U 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs
0  0  0
S 3PdQoXyQwWmerpt3SbF7Hbh3aukC5w28GP
0  0.00046714  4
W bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn
0  0.00006001  2
T bc1pgchl8k5hhxnlcfd3tmxp8vfk9jks438msjkth5lg93fzmskwy6js0kuqd2
0  0  0
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 3

Can you share the address of puzzle 67 that starts with bc and 3. I don't know how to find it. Someone previously shared the address for puzzle 66 that starts with bc and 3. Can you share it for puzzle 67 too?
bc1qww2r0wea6mges0nxv2w97zx8pef8dym3x2g8t3
__https://i.imgur.com/reTwOd9.png
sr. member
Activity: 1579
Merit: 267
You take it to a level where I can't keep up. I be humble. And rich. Stacking sats.

It's a good excuse for not being doing the dishes. I see that now.

Check my status. I merited the most GPU intensive. (Mining rig rentals) I paid for blowing top of the hashrate. Beginners stuff.

Tell Poul we don't die when he gets to that part.

On this one you have to use the thinker. Be the gas man. You have the problem. Find the solution. Root boy in control. In comes the 2 to the three and the one.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
34Sf4DnMt3z6XKKoWmZRw2nGyfGkDgNJZZ

Can you share the address of puzzle 67 that starts with bc and 3. I don't know how to find it. Someone previously shared the address for puzzle 66 that starts with bc and 3. Can you share it for puzzle 67 too?
member
Activity: 165
Merit: 26
It makes my day every time an intended troll post or unintended wrong statement results in some flame war  Grin
member
Activity: 122
Merit: 11
Now look into block explorer ... in 2023 there was a valid OUTGOING TRANSACTION from that address !!!

It is not an Outgoing transaction. An outgoing transaction is when that address is used as INPUT.

In the TX that you are mention:

Code:
b0780488cab40d45567a1eac97c2a456b48b216af3e6ecf47f1e5948a07e8c49
The address is bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn is listed as OUTPUT in the 2023 TX.




In the 2024 TX it was an INPUT.... Please learn something before talk

Compressed bech32 address derived from that key is :  bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn

No the address was derived from the Legacy address

Code:
P2PKH: 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
Hash: 20d45a6a762535700ce9e0b216e31994335db8a5

P2WPKH: bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn
Hash: 001420d45a6a762535700ce9e0b216e31994335db8a5

As you see you only need the RMD160 hash of it 20d45a6a762535700ce9e0b216e31994335db8a5 just apend two bytes 0x00 and 0x14 before the original hash see? No public key was needed for that

OK. I admit i was wrong.

Now i see it was INCOMING tx  TO that address. My bad.
hero member
Activity: 862
Merit: 662
Now look into block explorer ... in 2023 there was a valid OUTGOING TRANSACTION from that address !!!

It is not an Outgoing transaction. An outgoing transaction is when that address is used as INPUT.

In the TX that you are mention:

Code:
b0780488cab40d45567a1eac97c2a456b48b216af3e6ecf47f1e5948a07e8c49
The address is bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn is listed as OUTPUT in the 2023 TX.




In the 2024 TX it was an INPUT.... Please learn something before talk

Compressed bech32 address derived from that key is :  bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn

No the address was derived from the Legacy address

Code:
P2PKH: 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
Hash: 20d45a6a762535700ce9e0b216e31994335db8a5

P2WPKH: bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn
Hash: 001420d45a6a762535700ce9e0b216e31994335db8a5

As you see you only need the RMD160 hash of it 20d45a6a762535700ce9e0b216e31994335db8a5 just apend two bytes 0x00 and 0x14 before the original hash see? No public key was needed for that
member
Activity: 122
Merit: 11
What are you talking about ?!

No, What are you talking about?

Actually what garlonicon said was correct

To make a valid transaction you need a private key. Period.

The transaction we are talking about was made from bech32 address created from the same private key that puzzle 66 address containing funds. And it was created about a year ago from now.

What transaction are you talking about?

To send some value to some destination address you don't need its private key, you only need the private key of the source address, not of thr destination one...

Public key of puzzle 66 is:  024ee2be2d4e9f92d2f5a4a03058617dc45befe22938feed5b7a6b7282dd74cbdd

Compressed bech32 address derived from that key is :  bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn

Now look into block explorer ... in 2023 there was a valid OUTGOING TRANSACTION from that address !!!
hero member
Activity: 862
Merit: 662
What are you talking about ?!

No, What are you talking about?

Actually what garlonicon said was correct

To make a valid transaction you need a private key. Period.

The transaction we are talking about was made from bech32 address created from the same private key that puzzle 66 address containing funds. And it was created about a year ago from now.

What transaction are you talking about?

To send some value to some destination address you don't need its private key, you only need the private key of the source address, not of thr destination one...
jr. member
Activity: 43
Merit: 1
Quote
It is a proof that someone had private key to puzzle 66 year before it was officialy solved.
No, it is not. If you have any address for some compressed public key, then you can safely convert P2PKH into P2WPKH, and it will be standard. For example:
Code:
P2PKH: 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
Script: 76a914000000000000000000000000000000000000000088ac

P2WPKH: bc1qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq9e75rs
Script: 00140000000000000000000000000000000000000000
And if you know, that instead of those zeroes in the middle, you have other hex digits, then you can just copy-paste them, and change address type, as you wish. Of course, P2PKH works for both compressed and uncompressed keys, but P2WPKH are standard only for uncompressed ones.

What are you talking about ?!

To make a valid transaction you need a private key. Period.

The transaction we are talking about was made from bech32 address created from the same private key that puzzle 66 address containing funds. And it was created about a year ago from now.




where did you see outgoing transaction from priv key 66?Huh It was income transaction but in other type of address!!!
member
Activity: 122
Merit: 11
Quote
It is a proof that someone had private key to puzzle 66 year before it was officialy solved.
No, it is not. If you have any address for some compressed public key, then you can safely convert P2PKH into P2WPKH, and it will be standard. For example:
Code:
P2PKH: 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
Script: 76a914000000000000000000000000000000000000000088ac

P2WPKH: bc1qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq9e75rs
Script: 00140000000000000000000000000000000000000000
And if you know, that instead of those zeroes in the middle, you have other hex digits, then you can just copy-paste them, and change address type, as you wish. Of course, P2PKH works for both compressed and uncompressed keys, but P2WPKH are standard only for uncompressed ones.

What are you talking about ?!

To make a valid transaction you need a private key. Period.

The transaction we are talking about was made from bech32 address created from the same private key that puzzle 66 address containing funds. And it was created about a year ago from now.



copper member
Activity: 944
Merit: 2257
Quote
It is a proof that someone had private key to puzzle 66 year before it was officialy solved.
No, it is not. If you have any address for some compressed public key, then you can safely convert P2PKH into P2WPKH, and it will be standard. For example:
Code:
P2PKH: 1111111111111111111114oLvT2
Script: 76a914000000000000000000000000000000000000000088ac

P2WPKH: bc1qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq9e75rs
Script: 00140000000000000000000000000000000000000000
And if you know, that instead of those zeroes in the middle, you have other hex digits, then you can just copy-paste them, and change address type, as you wish. Of course, P2PKH works for both compressed and uncompressed keys, but P2WPKH are standard only for uncompressed ones.
member
Activity: 122
Merit: 11

  priv2addr.py 2832ed74f2b5e35ee
  Uncompressed Bitcoin Address: 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs

     Compressed Bitcoin Address: 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

    Uncompressed P2SH Address: 3GsgtYu5N1zZUAvtwwnN1sf9tf7shrJrex

       Compressed P2SH Address: 3LPuXLDK7AGtmHLv5x1Aj7jSzKmD2Dj4Zr

 Uncompressed Bech32 Address: bc1qzawsqu2pgrm7tglggkywujgfgefa56nwnlj6z3

    Compressed Bech32 Address: bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn <-------

looks like someone done some transaction tests a day before moving the balance from 66.. Smiley



Hm, so someone sent 6001 satoshis to 'bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn' almost a year ago (Sept 18 2023)? I think it's safe to say, that whoever sent that 6001 satoshis knew 66's private key. What do you all think?

Something very fishy is going on here ...  Shocked


Sending a transaction doesn't require knowledge of the private key. Anyone can initiate one, so it doesn't provide any meaningful information. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at with your suspicions.



That tx was confirmed on the blockchain... It is a proof that someone had private key to puzzle 66 year before it was officialy solved.

It's really strange.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0

  priv2addr.py 2832ed74f2b5e35ee
  Uncompressed Bitcoin Address: 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs

     Compressed Bitcoin Address: 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

    Uncompressed P2SH Address: 3GsgtYu5N1zZUAvtwwnN1sf9tf7shrJrex

       Compressed P2SH Address: 3LPuXLDK7AGtmHLv5x1Aj7jSzKmD2Dj4Zr

 Uncompressed Bech32 Address: bc1qzawsqu2pgrm7tglggkywujgfgefa56nwnlj6z3

    Compressed Bech32 Address: bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn <-------

looks like someone done some transaction tests a day before moving the balance from 66.. Smiley

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/09/21/gzrwW.jpeg

Hm, so someone sent 6001 satoshis to 'bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn' almost a year ago (Sept 18 2023)? I think it's safe to say, that whoever sent that 6001 satoshis knew 66's private key. What do you all think?

Something very fishy is going on here ...  Shocked


Sending a transaction doesn't require knowledge of the private key. Anyone can initiate one, so it doesn't provide any meaningful information. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at with your suspicions.

member
Activity: 122
Merit: 11

  priv2addr.py 2832ed74f2b5e35ee
  Uncompressed Bitcoin Address: 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs

     Compressed Bitcoin Address: 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

    Uncompressed P2SH Address: 3GsgtYu5N1zZUAvtwwnN1sf9tf7shrJrex

       Compressed P2SH Address: 3LPuXLDK7AGtmHLv5x1Aj7jSzKmD2Dj4Zr

 Uncompressed Bech32 Address: bc1qzawsqu2pgrm7tglggkywujgfgefa56nwnlj6z3

    Compressed Bech32 Address: bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn <-------

looks like someone done some transaction tests a day before moving the balance from 66.. Smiley



Hm, so someone sent 6001 satoshis to 'bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn' almost a year ago (Sept 18 2023)? I think it's safe to say, that whoever sent that 6001 satoshis knew 66's private key. What do you all think?

Something very fishy is going on here ...  Shocked
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 3

  priv2addr.py 2832ed74f2b5e35ee
  Uncompressed Bitcoin Address: 138XxHZGcKM6WyWuYCijLsoCd8K3x4WYjs

     Compressed Bitcoin Address: 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so

    Uncompressed P2SH Address: 3GsgtYu5N1zZUAvtwwnN1sf9tf7shrJrex

       Compressed P2SH Address: 3LPuXLDK7AGtmHLv5x1Aj7jSzKmD2Dj4Zr

 Uncompressed Bech32 Address: bc1qzawsqu2pgrm7tglggkywujgfgefa56nwnlj6z3

    Compressed Bech32 Address: bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn <-------

looks like someone done some transaction tests a day before moving the balance from 66.. Smiley

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/09/21/gzrwW.jpeg

Hm, so someone sent 6001 satoshis to 'bc1qyr2956nky56hqr8fuzepdccejse4mw994lyftn' almost a year ago (Sept 18 2023)? I think it's safe to say, that whoever sent that 6001 satoshis knew 66's private key. What do you all think?

Edit: No, someone just took 66's wallet address and converted it to bech32, and sent 6001 sats there a year ago, and about 45mins after 66 was solved someone picked up those sats. Thanks Alberto for clarifying.
hero member
Activity: 862
Merit: 662
pubkeys was at privkeysite in 2023:

 Grin

You don't need the public key to calculate those address... They are some other hash made from the original rmd160 hash

Check again, the timestamps show the bc1 outgoing transaction was ~41 minutes AFTER the 5.9btc outgoing

it was an user on some telegram group:

Pages:
Jump to: