Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it - page 69. (Read 215611 times)

Some times it's hard. !Stylo! Right now!

Cheers.

---

There is some key generator/scanner sites out there. Google.

A machine that generates random keys and check them for funds.

where i can find the big list of funded btc public keys?

What exactly makes you think that this case could not occur during the payout process of one of the "puzzles" mentioned here? Just because someone opens a thread on a forum and opens the starting gun for a 32BTC, is that legal? How do you know who the coins originally belonged to and what source they came from? Could also have been created and collected from illegal activities and the puzzle here is a test to see if and how and when someone gets "caught". Suppose it were a case like this: the person who has access to the big safe can't take the coins out because he knows he's not the owner and the mafia bosses and drug lords he'd be stealing from wouldn't speak well of him. So he lets a few "rats" go to the food bowl to see what happens. A rogue who thinks evil

Good luck cashing out those BTC without some agency tracking you down in an instant and start asking questions (and the money back)

Well, in fact there is a key and if you search hard enough you will find it. Just because no outgoing transactions have been made from this wallet so far doesn't mean that the address is fatal from a technical point of view - it can't be. The address is intact, the coins are there. Now someone just has to get the right key (don't forget multi-sig?) et-voilá

1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF    ( This is the address of the Mt Gox Hacker. )

I  lost  0.98 BTC  on Mtgox exchange in 2014  ~~~
After waiting 10 years, I might be able to get 21% back from MTGox this year ~~

this address is  No spend txid, NO  r,s,z,  NO public key, cracking probability = 0%

If you gain such supernatural power, puzzle 130 is just a fun, you can get access to more mysterious address like (1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF) ) But here we just talk about scientific ways

Since more and more people here starts to realize that anyone who would like to resolve the remaining puzzles needs a massive amount of hardware maybe it's time to pick another path: clairvoyance 

I know it sounds stupid, but recently i heard about clairvoyant that many times helped the police to find dead bodies.

Is there any supernatural method to guess for example first 10 hex numbers from puzzle 130 ? 

The puzzle creator already stated the reasons for the challenge.
To prove the bitcoin security:


Nothing else to say.


For #130 356-400 RTX 4090s

For #66 thousands of GPUs

 
You need a GPU farm for this. That's nothing special if you are already a millionaire.

There are countless programs built over the years, from Python scripts to C, local, distributed, running on CPU and GPU, to attack the puzzles, and lots of theoretical thoughts and debates on solving this problem, posted in these forums. The only consensus is that it might be (or remain) a very difficult problem to solve, unless you either level up the computing resources to stuff like hundreds of last-gen GPUs (done already), and a few prays since it's all a probability game; or discover / implement some method that is proven to work better than the best currently known, by some smaller or greater margin. But don't expect that kind of knowledge to ever go public before it gets exploited, if ever. I still have a strong feeling that #120 (or at least #125) were not solved by public software, or not without modifications to both the theoretical parameters and the implementation approach. But to understand why, you'll probably get lost in the academic papers published in the last 30 years, maybe you will find some idea of improvements, for which nobody released a public implementation yet

It's better to say 'no bug in Bitcoin'. The creator just sent some bitcoin to some random addresses, that's nothing special.

Hi all,

I have no clue how to use this forum but i assume the reply buttons posts a new reply to the end of the thread (correct me if my formatting is shite).

im interested in volunteering my hardware (last gen zen laptop hardware however ill upgrade to a mining rig if it looks feasible) to the search of #66, #67, etc (whichever is lowest and we know hasnt been solved) or any multiple of 5 (the ones with pubkeys available). I know jack dick about cryptography but currently doing EEE and comp sci at uni so i have at least some fundamental knowledge which makes me better than the circle guy!

I am most interested in learning about how to crack priv keys from pub keys, but in the meantime if theres some program built for gpus or cpus ill have that run in the background while i try and get up to speed with this whole new fangled technology called "bit coins" and "crypto" /s (i will try and learn tho).

and if anyone knows someone who knows how to run pools (or details of the guys who are currently running pools) and how to have the pool split into sequential chunks that are tracked (analogus to how downloads are split into chunks and then put together) if it hasnt been done (but i assume it has), i think thatll be a great way to attack most the problems as itll remove the chance of dupes (also i think advertising pools and combining seperate ones so indiviudals are convinced to join is another good way to go about reducing duplicate calculations). itll take some convincing as people are pretty selfish minded (think about how gambling addicts are all or nothing) but ill stay optimistic.

(also if theres a better group chat that doesnt include circles guys coming in someone lmk, cheers)

alrightly life story over,
hope i can help
random

There is no error or bug  in this puzzle. I think this puzzle was made by one of the first users here, casascius or satoshi himself. We're scr**** to solve this.  There is no easy way.  

Absolutely!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK32jo7i5LQ

total useless for the Bitcoin 32 BTC puzzle

I still don't see anything special. In such a large set of numbers it is not unusual for groups of two, three, four or five to repeat themselves.
It would be interesting if they were repeated following a rule, or forming a pattern of some kind, but I don't see that.

Please stop spreading around this super confidential knowledge about the arabic numerals and all the secret patterns in Adobe's vector design software. I am not kidding when I also say you should consult a psychiatrist and explain to them exactly what you've discovered, they can help you further. Clearly all the experts in information theory missed the magical apotheotic hidden relationship between random font sizes and numerical angles on circles. Also, the entire group theory science community (joined by their fellow game theory enthusiasts, which usually hate each other) are now amazed by the unbelievable discovery of some repeated sequence of base 10 digits in a random output feed of fully entropic data source, that you just provided. They will now need to rethink all the combinatorial formulas and revisit the basic principles of statistics. Look what you did now. Eagerly waiting on more critical information about how you plan to find the bugs in the creator's algorithm / software, since you don't really have time to write some stupid code (who does, right? we have illlustrator these days) please the next picture you post should be the envelope from Stockholm calling you to the big ceremony for your breakthroughs with drawing lines.

Let's look at it another way!
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2024/04/26/rwvdf.gif

The video and the source of all these works are in the Telegram channel and you can download them.
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers

Nope. There is an exact math formula for making this puzzle with some script, errors = ZERO.  
He used used a custom method like: "Type 1 Deterministic Wallet"
Masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty. There is no error here in arithemitic precision.

https://thebookofbitcoin.github.io/html/storage/deterministic_wallets.html

Everything else is a conspiracy theory.

No, that's definitely not what I meant, and I'm looking for a bug in wallet key generation.
  Creator said these are sequential keys from the wallet. Errors are possible. It cannot be denied. Now why did I check the keys in this way? If you want to do what the software does for me with programming, I think it will be heavy and time consuming. But in Adobe Illustrator, a lot of things are automated and I can see the changes in real time.
The problem is that you think I did all this stuff and the layout of the numbers myself, all I did was not draw a spiral circle and type the search keys one after the other and start changing the font size and spacing. Their numbers and degrees
    I got some weird stuff in some settings.
Normally nothing special is observed. I increased the font size to 11 and tested the distance between the numbers from 0 to 320, and in this case we can see some initial numbers of the keys on the opposite side.
You said that the radius and degree are correct only for the number 65 and not for 64. But I suggest you draw a line from the starting point of key number 64 to the center of the circle, you will get the wrong result. For the correct result, draw the same line as the mirror of that line from the center of the circle to the point opposite the beginning of key 64, it reaches 177.99 degrees. What is the reason for this?
Draw a diameter and start rotating with the center of the circle. You will see that the degree value corresponds to the numbers that the line crosses and there are only a few dots. You will see the numbers on the opposite side. What is the cause of this?
   Why do the key numbers correspond to the degree value? Is the reason for this a coincidence?
Why do we get correct results when the font size is 11 and the spacing between numbers is 320?
What is the relationship between 11 and 320 and wallet keys?
You say to yourself, why don't I open the 66 key? Well, this circle also covers other keys that have not been discovered yet, and there are other numbers on the path of radius, diameter, and degree, which is why I shared the same opinion. to find the correct numbers. which was ridiculed by some people. There is no problem, history has always shown that every new thought and idea is met with ridicule at first, and I did not lose anything. I am not a genius and I used my career to find the key.

Apophenia is a mental disorder to see connections and patterns between unrelated or random things that are not really there—gives rise to conspiracy theories.