In the analysis, everything was based on the past.
Some charts (TA) is based on the past, yeah.
Personally I find it difficult to make chart based only on the future prices.
However, his analysis also includes possible future events (ICO crackdown, SegWit donations etc).
It's unlikely that bitcoin is going to continue its exponential growth curve, at least for me.
We'll still continue to go up but probably in a generally slower pace over a longer term.
$15k in March is definitely possible, a crash by June again would be possible, but for it to 5x within less than 1 year and reach an ATH isn't believable at least from his evidence.
Doesn't need x5 for new ATHs.
Last year it was even x20 at one point anyway, so what's not believable? A $trillion mcap?
Make sure you read updated section "ICO-issued Tokens Will Collapse?" in the linked steemit post.
Also keep an eye on
April 17.
You guys are about to have new reality.
yeah well some people around here don't forget things easily
because they read OPs and it is no secret and you have been calling a big drop ever since price went above $2000 and was stuck at a new resistance above that!
and apparently you have a thing for number "8" because it was $800 that you were calling for back then
Please note that I'm not @anonymint. I only linked to his analysis on steemit.
And I suppose that scandalmonger @BrewMaster didn't forget anything, but is actually making things up, however I don't know why tho, or what's his agenda.
I exposed someone similar in the past.
Apparently,
your allegation is also not true.You guys should read more carefully, and follow any further adjustments to his analysis.
I hope that other readers can make reasonable distinction between sourced evidence (truth), and empty claims (i.e. lies).