Bitcoin is already an international currency, it's used easily worldwide and nobody could ban it, it's even used a lot better than fiat sometimes.
I know if no one is able to stop bitcoin , but many are still many places that do not support the bitcoin . May be not only not support but did not accept bitcoin whose prices fluctuate because of fear of loss that would be obtained.
Topic: Bitcoin to be international currency - page 95. (Read 94961 times)
Bitcoin is already an international currency, it's used easily worldwide and nobody could ban it, it's even used a lot better than fiat sometimes.
I know if no one is able to stop bitcoin , but many are still many places that do not support the bitcoin . May be not only not support but did not accept bitcoin whose prices fluctuate because of fear of loss that would be obtained.
Bitcoin is already an international currency, it's used easily worldwide and nobody could ban it, it's even used a lot better than fiat sometimes.
I know if no one is able to stop bitcoin , but many are still many places that do not support the bitcoin . May be not only not support but did not accept bitcoin whose prices fluctuate because of fear of loss that would be obtained.
Bitcoin is already an international currency, it's used easily worldwide and nobody could ban it, it's even used a lot better than fiat sometimes.
You can say that Bitcoin is an international currency because not matter where you are in the world you can make use of it.
The thing they should go for in the future is that you are going to be able to pay with Bitcoin at stores in real life.
The thing they should go for in the future is that you are going to be able to pay with Bitcoin at stores in real life.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
This is the right time to invest in bitcoin as price is not too high at a moment, price will be beyond our expectations in future and it will be more harder to invest in future.
Bitcoin is already an international currency. It is a digital money and therefore it is not issued by, backed by, or tied to any particular nation or government. The only thing is Bitcoins are not very popular and many nations haven't really allowed the use of the cryptocurrency. But it's convience is attracting many people everyday.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
This is the right time to invest in bitcoin as price is not too high at a moment, price will be beyond our expectations in future and it will be more harder to invest in future.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
This is the right time to invest in bitcoin as price is not too high at a moment, price will be beyond our expectations in future and it will be more harder to invest in future.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
i think at this moment bitcoin has become the 1st international currency in online world. because i found the merchand growing everyday, and now it's very easy to spend our bitcoin
You see that in your country? I dont see one in ours yet. I think businessmen are thinking so much about it and how they will profit out of it. Maybe there are too much risk that is why they cant start yet.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
Maybe not now but in coming future you will just surprise that you can mingle some fellow bitcoin enthusiast in the future, bitcoin is really rising and everyday the volume of users are keep increasing and for bitcoin using as transaction online money around the globe well theres no doubt bitcoin now can be called legitimate global currency since it was used by all race of people in online world.
i think at this moment bitcoin has become the 1st international currency in online world. because i found the merchand growing everyday, and now it's very easy to spend our bitcoin
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
here's the link of the article that i read (http://www.coindesk.com/2016-bitcoin-challenge-100-million-users/)
it's for you to decide if it is valid or not, but having 100m active users is a good thing.
I imagine it would be mostly about concurrent users of the network, they still wont be able to identify computers automatically transacting and actual people behind it but I think the most reliable method to measure bitcoin would be peak use or concurrent transactions. Most people wont be using two phones at once to send bitcoin even if they had two wallets so that should be more accurate.
I think thats why blocksize is being an issue, too many users and the tiny spammy coins are taking up space from the bigger players sending hundreds or more. Surely if block reward halves, the transaction cost is going to rise to compensate but maybe thats not the plan
I think thats why blocksize is being an issue, too many users and the tiny spammy coins are taking up space from the bigger players sending hundreds or more. Surely if block reward halves, the transaction cost is going to rise to compensate but maybe thats not the plan
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
how much people is using bitcoin at the moment.It is volume,but you can never say from it how many users are in btc industry,because one may have 0,02 btc and another one : 4 or even more :]
We need to achieve a huge adoption before we can be considered as a strong currency and when that happens the government cannot do any bad thing with a huge volume of supporters because we will beat them for sure.
As of jan 2016 there are 100m users of bitcoin and is already a strong crypto currency.
i don't see any reason why gov. would do anything about bitcoin, and what do you mean
we will beat them even with (lets say) 70% of population is using bitcoin fiat money will still
win. bitcoin is better of being an alternate currency than being the main one.
100m users? From where did you get this estimate?
Isn't it tough to get an estimate because people have multiple wallets and addresses?
Jump to: