Bitcoin TOP-500 Richest - page 3. | Bitcointalksearch.org

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Quote from: TheKoziTwo on November 22, 2013, 05:54:08 PM

Anarcho-capitalist "Karl Gray" (producer of the documentary life on bitcoin) has accumulated 100,000 BTC

http://rt.com/shows/keiser-report/episode-526-max-keiser-025/ (14:55)

WTF *jaw drops*

jl2012

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1111

SecondMarket BIT: 60000XBT as of 25 Nov 2013

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gbtc-bitcoin-investment-trust-observer-337486

TheKoziTwo

legendary

Activity: 1552

Merit: 1047

Anarcho-capitalist "Karl Gray" (producer of the documentary life on bitcoin) has accumulated 100,000 BTC

http://rt.com/shows/keiser-report/episode-526-max-keiser-025/ (14:55)

Rampion

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1018

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 20, 2013, 06:46:56 AM

Quote from: Loaded on November 20, 2013, 01:34:36 AM

Holdings as of 11/20/2013: 182,592 BTC.

I'm curious: why would you disclose this?

Someone that would like to manipulate the market at some point. Imagine the effect of a post by Loaded saying he is willing to unload Cheesy

manfred

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1001

Energy is Wealth

That would have to be one of the Satoshi guys, or?
https://blockchain.info/tx/1c12443203a48f42cdf7b1acee5b4b1c1fedc144cb909a3bf5edbffafb0cd204

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Quote from: Rival on November 22, 2013, 10:32:00 AM

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 22, 2013, 10:10:11 AM

Quote from: Rival on November 22, 2013, 10:05:57 AM

Just to reply to an earlier discussion in this thread, I believe only bitcoins in a wallet under direct control should be counted. Several have suggested that investments or third-party accounts should be counted, but that is illogical. By the same convolution of logic I could suggest that Bill Gates is in the top 10 holders of bitcoins, he just has his coins invested in dollars at the moment and can convert them back to coins whenever he chooses.

A bitcoin wallet is the direct measure. Who cares how many shares of ASICMiner, Labcoin, or even Microsoft you have? It is irrelevant to how many coins you actually control. Otherwise, coins can be double counted. One could state that they have 1000 coins, but that 500 of them are in ASICminer and 500 are on MtGox. In reality you have zero. ASICMiner has 500 and MtGox have 500. You only have IOU's that may or may not be redeemable at any given time.

Well, if I own 1% of the shares of a company. And that company control X coins. Than I own X/100 coins.

They own the coins. Ownership in a public company does not include the rights to unilaterally dispose of their assets as you see fit. You get only what they decide to give you.

No they are yours. THAT is how public companies work. Shareholder jointly own the company.

Rival

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Quote from: wachtwoord on November 22, 2013, 10:10:11 AM

Quote from: Rival on November 22, 2013, 10:05:57 AM

Just to reply to an earlier discussion in this thread, I believe only bitcoins in a wallet under direct control should be counted. Several have suggested that investments or third-party accounts should be counted, but that is illogical. By the same convolution of logic I could suggest that Bill Gates is in the top 10 holders of bitcoins, he just has his coins invested in dollars at the moment and can convert them back to coins whenever he chooses.

A bitcoin wallet is the direct measure. Who cares how many shares of ASICMiner, Labcoin, or even Microsoft you have? It is irrelevant to how many coins you actually control. Otherwise, coins can be double counted. One could state that they have 1000 coins, but that 500 of them are in ASICminer and 500 are on MtGox. In reality you have zero. ASICMiner has 500 and MtGox have 500. You only have IOU's that may or may not be redeemable at any given time.

Well, if I own 1% of the shares of a company. And that company control X coins. Than I own X/100 coins.

They own the coins. Ownership in a public company does not include the rights to unilaterally dispose of their assets as you see fit. You get only what they decide to give you.

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Quote from: Rival on November 22, 2013, 10:05:57 AM

Just to reply to an earlier discussion in this thread, I believe only bitcoins in a wallet under direct control should be counted. Several have suggested that investments or third-party accounts should be counted, but that is illogical. By the same convolution of logic I could suggest that Bill Gates is in the top 10 holders of bitcoins, he just has his coins invested in dollars at the moment and can convert them back to coins whenever he chooses.

A bitcoin wallet is the direct measure. Who cares how many shares of ASICMiner, Labcoin, or even Microsoft you have? It is irrelevant to how many coins you actually control. Otherwise, coins can be double counted. One could state that they have 1000 coins, but that 500 of them are in ASICminer and 500 are on MtGox. In reality you have zero. ASICMiner has 500 and MtGox have 500. You only have IOU's that may or may not be redeemable at any given time.

Well, if I own 1% of the shares of a company. And that company control X coins. Than I own X/100 coins.

Rival

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 502

Just to reply to an earlier discussion in this thread, I believe only bitcoins in a wallet under direct control should be counted. Several have suggested that investments or third-party accounts should be counted, but that is illogical. By the same convolution of logic I could suggest that Bill Gates is in the top 10 holders of bitcoins, he just has his coins invested in dollars at the moment and can convert them back to coins whenever he chooses.

A bitcoin wallet is the direct measure. Who cares how many shares of ASICMiner, Labcoin, or even Microsoft you have? It is irrelevant to how many coins you actually control. Otherwise, coins can be double counted. One could state that they have 1000 coins, but that 500 of them are in ASICminer and 500 are on MtGox. In reality you have zero. ASICMiner has 500 and MtGox have 500. You only have IOU's that may or may not be redeemable at any given time.

manfred

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1001

Energy is Wealth

Quote from: jl2012 on November 21, 2013, 10:47:39 PM

Why is this listed as off-topic? Huh

Because it was moved here from the Bitcoin Discussion treat if i remember right.

jl2012

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1111

Why is this listed as off-topic? Huh

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Quote from: Loaded on November 20, 2013, 01:34:36 AM

Holdings as of 11/20/2013: 182,592 BTC.

I'm curious: why would you disclose this?

Oh and I'm mostly jealous for obvious reasons Tongue

(but sure I learned, most of us get what we deserve Wink

)

mrhelpful

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1002

I`m surprised on a few who dont have a lot more. Esp ppl who were involved in facebook.

sidhujag

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1005

Realsolid raised atleast 25k btc from fees he holds 50k fees too.

rpietila

donator

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1036

Quote from: BTC_GHD on November 18, 2013, 05:50:10 PM

If only I was one of the 500 :3

At these reduced prices we are enjoying today, only about $1M is needed to secure your place among the Most Wealthy.

Actually I am still baffled how cheap it is. There are so many who have $1M... I think it was 30 million individuals globally. Only 500 with $1M in BITCOINS!

rpietila

donator

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1036

Quote from: Loaded on November 20, 2013, 01:34:36 AM

Holdings as of 11/20/2013: 182,592 BTC.

Congratulations! You made it to the TOP-10 by beating FBI Grin

Loaded

full member

Activity: 135

Merit: 113

whale eater

Holdings as of 11/20/2013: 182,592 BTC.

bitmarket.io

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1001

At this rate satoshi will be a billionaire soon.

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Quote from: mezzomix on November 18, 2013, 06:41:10 AM

Quote from: rpietila on October 30, 2013, 04:12:11 AM

13. BTC100,000. "mezzomix"

You can remove me from the list. To get a better number divide it by 5.

Still .... Nice driving son! Wink

BTC_GHD

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

If only I was one of the 500 :3

Topic: Bitcoin TOP-500 Richest - page 3. (Read 79735 times)