I have recently read how bitcoin distribution is much more uneven the the current fiat wealth distribution in the the developed countries and the whole world. Few individuals hold very large amount of bitcoins, I am guessing mostly early adopters.
those big balances you see mostly belong to services such as exchanges cold storage. like the first one belonging to bitfinex.
the early adopters have sold at least something and moved their coins to multiple addresses so that nobody can see it. and that is what you get for being an early adopter. there is nothing wrong with that. you could have done it too, the early adopters were not some secret society who got the news about bitcoin first!!!
One of the early arguments for bitcoin was that it will allow for a fairer distribution of wealth.
not it has never been!
bitcoin is a currency and it is supposed to be a currency not a wealth distributor!
If bitcoin ever becomes a global currency, a handful of individuals will be extremely rich,more than today's billionaires and policy makers. Those individuals will own half or more of the global assets. They will rule, influence the world and its people.
i bought bitcoin 2 years ago when price was $200. each coin that i may h ave bought back then is worth $7000+ today. is it unfair that i risked my money for 2+ years and you kept your money in banks?