Again it's not dishonest.
It is, try to read once more. Your arguments have nothing to do with what poeEDgar has said.
Their inactions are speaking louder than their actions. If they would have been really honest in solving the block size issue in a timely matter they would have communicated a clear path for doing so. Which they didn't.
THAT is either dishonest or incompetent.
Inaction? brg444 has given you a summary of what has been done by them in the recent years for Bitcoin scalability.
Jesus Christ, why are they gathering in Montreal in two weeks then? Because they are dishonest or incompetent? Or maybe to try to find a solution?
It gets really pathetic.
Ok so where is the deadline then for those solutions then? Because it all come to this.
Deadline for implementing a yet-nonexistent solution -- that boggles my mind. I hope you understand what you are writing.
Your suggested feel of urgency only means that anyone can feed you anything pretending to scale Bitcoin and you will be happy to eat it. In this case, I see no point in continuing arguing with you.
Having a clear scalability path in a clear time frame is what all of the big businesses need. Too bad you and Core are just too blind to see this but we are now facing the consequences. Now face it.
It will likely go down like this:
1. Sep-Oct Devs will pick one of the solutions they have been talking about.
2. They will develop detailed plans.
3. They will test it rigorously and subject it to peer review.
4. They will plan its deployment, and announce the date of the fork.
5. January 1st will hit, and XT will be clearly rejected.
6. The solution will go live.
6. Hearn, Gavin and their puppets will be remembered as obstacles in the process, never to be trusted or respected.
