Topic: BitcoinCasinoPro Corrupted and Unethical Behavior | More Evidence! - page 6. (Read 9383 times)

We do offer provably fair and verifiable gaming on both websites, but this is not the issue we are discussing here. Your actions on the published screenshots is what we are discussing.

3 pointless and irrelevant screenshots, a made up thread title, a few ghost usernames, a highjacking marketing thread, some tissues, and a tampon. Like I said maybe next month, I think them are the exact words that was said previous month.  

From an adult's perspective this is how I would probably problem solve an "issue" like this. I would identify the issue (if any), try to correct, if not correctable I would ask how we could do better.. If that seemed unreasonable or unattainable I would agree to disagree but maintain professionalism at all time. I don't know what to say it's not difficult we don't want a "sorry" or even want you folks to like us we just demand professionalism and surety casino players are provided an equal and fair handshake while playing.

You claim each and every individual has fair enough lets grow from that I simply brought up the concept of provable gaming as a legitimate way of assuring such and that's only if the casino or dice site runs from the blockchain. Several companies we brought this up to actually agree and are changing the entire provable odds coding to provide such but you cannot expect us to turn a cheek when a company wants to play bully on the block.

Bitcoin Casino Pro actually has companies ranking better in respected categories that are not sponsors than some that are. (Seals With Clubs is a perfect example) One of the main benefits of being an elite sponsor comes with location, location, location.. Ratings are not actually bought. We upgraded a particular casino recently to the A+ mark as they earned it that is the goal of the site.

It only took 3 screenshots of your own actions in the open public to push your biased scoring even further. How is that not corrupted behavior?

Okay this honestly seems quite bullshit. Don't put bias in your reviews. Paying sites should not have higher ratings. Non-paying sites should not have low ratings.

The only one doing wrongdoing is the child on the other end supposedly calling out people on an anonymous bitcoin forum. Are you going to publish clients information that use bit777 if they file a complaint? That is another deep concern within the company now. Oh BTW your rating just recently changed today let me know when you want to act professional from a business and customer service perspective. 5 unique bitcoin gambling companies have already bid on this months monthly auction with 2 other companies in contact with me considering bidding. if you put your ego aside and worked on you and the companies faults you would probably be pleasantly surprised on the upgrades you would receive. We don't need to "corrupt" anyone conversions clearly speak for themselves pretty cut and dry. And all your doing is making yourself look like a douche bag that my friend you can take to the bank

BTW I was told to let you folks bury yourself I'm done with the conversation enjoy your rant.

If noone speaks up when there is a clear wrongdoing and corruption, nothing will ever change.

We all know you are a good casino, and those reviews are ridiculous, but using expletives towards others is not the best way to go about solving you're problems. It makes you look immature, not reliable.

Indeed we are only about 75+ sites away from having almost all of the reviews done. I'm sorry Addi I do appreciate the patience really do as I promise you your on the schedule and soon. I agree this would be a good time to possibly start on it instead of pulling wieners out and throwing on the table like bit777 wants to do on a regular basis.

7 years ago I was in a dispute feel free to contact him we are good friends now. I use my real name and publishing info on my network how about yourself?    I have nothing to hide if I did I for sure wouldn't publish such information when one has the ability to easily and completely be anonymous in the bitcoin industry. I would hate to see your closet but on a honest note your attitude and childish behaviors are comical. You going to shoot up a mall or something next? GROW UP

What about us AKsplace? I see we are not yet rated?

We are provably fair. We have a perfect track record of paying out all our players. We have had several big winners/payouts that proof our liquidity. We are a real, incorporated business.

Also Alan you seem to be involved in a scandal from a few years back: Alan Karre, Major Wager & Stolen Databases

http://mb.winneronline.com/showthread.html?p=117702&mode=threaded

Well lets break your accusation down one more time of the "5 none advertisers"

1 and 2. Bit777 and Peerbet Circle operated by the same company in which provable gaming is a big concern, Customer service well I think your actions clearly show they not very mature either not sure I would want 10 btc here.
3. Satoshi Poker -- Full of Bots along with many player complaints. On the side of that the folks who manage it I have spoke to for months and are decent people.
4. BitsPoker -- Another potential company that is currently a tad underfunded but the folks who manage it are also great individuals. I would bet 10 to 1 they would agree with current rating based on that alone although they vision a great site which I personally agree with.
5. Bit365, Like I have always mentioned we take players feedback into consideration and with a few searches its clearly visible the dissatisfaction by many and we also have them at a D- for Financial Security they are asking for floating loans previously and if I recall was slow paying for sometime. (don't quote me would have to look back at notes)

With that said I don't see how you could justify a higher poker rating for bitspoker or satoshi poker currently with poker sites like Seals With Clubs and Strike Sapphire available as honestly they are far from the same league at this present time. I have made it publicly clear Seals needs a competitor for the good of the industry and hope someone does so. I bet Micon could come into this thread and argue against your point as well not only from a poker standard but a rating standard as they actually declined advertising or banner swapping of any nature with us. (but we added them anyhow because it's good for the bitcoin gambling community and the right thing to do)

So if you can explain how we are corrupt or acting unethical please let me know because frankly your acting like a little boy who isn't allowed extra recess because he got caught pulling a girls hair in class. (oh and publicly declined advertising on Bit777 in the past month probably really burned your butt) Clearly we must be a threat to bit777 as on a regular basis and has became in inside joke on how "insecure you are with the rating we provide"

With all this being said I'm human far from being perfect but my goal and intentions are good. I'm sorry I refuse to just upgrade you guys without merit from my perspective if you have more players that want to submit positive ratings we would naturally upgrade like we would any other company. I have no "target" out on you just trying to offer the best service I can.

The screenshot you are publishing is irrelevant. We have suspended our instant withdrawals since more than 2 weeks ago, and that is the exact message it shows. We will be releasing Peerbet's new website soon and instant withdrawals will remain suspended until then.

It's ok, nobody trusts his ratings anyways. Why would you trust a 13 year old in his basement?

back on the sauce again?  



I bet you can speak to several owners listed within the "Green boxes" where you accuse of such and they will agree with ratings and consider each other friends.

Another thing, is this the low ball tactic afraid we was going to publish this?



We have been transparent with you since the beginning and I continue to tell you "bullying tactics will not work!" Once players have a provable gaming atmosphere and a wallet that's loaded  I would be more than willing to discuss the rating.