GazetaBitcoin, Thank you for your comment [...] visibly fatigue affected my concentration.
Yes, no worry, buddy. It is an overall impressive work you did here, with the contest, with the related topics, with the quiz... It's totally understandable.
Regarding the second point, it seems to me that I am right, I found a quote from Theymos dated 2013, but I can not find a later post on this topic. [I am sure that such a post exists]
Yes, I knew that comment theymos made in 2013, where he said that in 8 years he'll release Satoshi's IP. And I also remember a second post, where he said he changed his mind (can't find it either).
But the problems at the second question are the following (look at the picture again):
- "When did theymos promise he'll publish Satoshi's PMs and IP address?" / Answers: 2021, 2025, 2040+, Never
- The description of the correct answer: "In 2013,
Alex announced that he intends to publish Satoshi's PMs and IP addresses in ~8 years. But in 2018/19 he
abandoned this idea, citing that these data would be of great historical interest only decades later".
First of all, that "Alex" name should be changed with "theymos". His name is not Alex... And I don't know who can be this Alex
The second problem is with the answer itself. If theymos changed his mind and abandoned the idea of publishing Satoshi's PMs and IP, then, basically, the answer should be "Never". However, he stated after that this information would be of a great historic interest
later. Later is not the same with
never, but bear in mind that he still did not say a specific date (year 2045, 2060 etc.). Nor he said that he will
ever post them... Being of historic interest decades later doesn't imply he will publish them (even decades later). Therefore, I think the correct answer should be "Other" (or "Another"), as nobody knows if theymos will disclose this information at all; and, if he will disclose after some "decades", nobody knows after how many decades. It can be after year 2030 or after 2040 or after 2050 and so on... Do you see my point here?