Bitcointalk Ranking-up pipeline- Those close to their next rank (lacking Merits) - page 25.

Saint-loup

legendary

Activity: 2604

Merit: 2353

Quote from: fillippone on December 02, 2019, 01:46:47 PM

I didn't bother to reverse enginer my email to discover my required activity to become legendary (is that a public algorithm, btw?)...

Yes it's public, but there is a secret seed that isn't, and without this secret seed you can't compute the activity treshold.
(This secret seed is the same for everybody AFAIK)

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8298386
(I can't quote the post because Cloudfare detects the SQL command and blocks the post)

DdmrDdmr

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 10802

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain

Quote from: KTChampions on December 02, 2019, 04:49:13 AM

<…>I was just a day late and didn’t get on the list<...>

You will next week onwards though …

Quote from: fillippone on December 02, 2019, 01:46:47 PM

I am not in that list.<...>

Although described in the OP, the title did not state the "lacking merit" part. I’ve readjusted it to make it clearer.

You’d therefore be in other sorts of lists (lacking Activity), such as this one:
https://public.tableau.com/shared/SS43NR2JK?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link

-> Heroes lacking up to 40% Activity – That makes 17 of us, 11 of which lack less than 20% activity to reach the minimum threshold. Then it’s all about the Magical Activity Number each one got assigned when the account was created. As far as I’m aware, that number is unknown to us.

Quote from: suchmoon on December 02, 2019, 01:58:32 PM

<…>

Good point. That is why I included the DT trust counters along with the rest of the information, although one should read the feedback too to make understand the reasons behind the trust ratings, and get a composition of the complete picture.

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: suchmoon on December 02, 2019, 01:58:32 PM

Anyone considering sending merits to top those users up - please check trust feedback. Quite a few have been involved in merit farming. Basically most users who haven't been earning merits consistently (even if slowly) over the last 120 days, which you can see straight from the user profile, probably don't deserve a top up.

because you sent me distrust because I sent trust feedback to people. people were afraid to write feedback.

Quote from: wolwoo on September 04, 2019, 12:31:05 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on September 04, 2019, 12:16:46 PM

Quote from: wolwoo on September 04, 2019, 11:41:28 AM

I have a question for you: why did you add me to your distrust list? What did I do to make you a distrust? Who hated me for you?

please answer honestly

Not sure how that's relevant to the topic at hand, but it's because of reference-less trust ratings you posted for a large number of users on August 29.

yes I sent, is it forbidden? I haven't used feedback since the day I became a member. In the light of the information I have gained for 2 and a half years, I wrote feedback to people I trust in the forum. what is the problem? Would it be more ethical if I did it over time? why do you tend to draw bad things out of what people do? What is the main problem? why can't we trust each other and get rid of our prejudices.

Do I have to prove to you and to each member of the forum what I am, who I am?

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/1003533.html

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Anyone considering sending merits to top those users up - please check trust feedback. Quite a few have been involved in merit farming. Basically most users who haven't been earning merits consistently (even if slowly) over the last 120 days, which you can see straight from the user profile, probably don't deserve a top up.

fillippone

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 16328

Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

I am not in that list.
Sad

Gaining activity is so more difficult and boring that gaining merits!

I didn't bother to reverse enginer my email to discover my required activity to become legendary (is that a public algorithm, btw?)...
But still, long journey ahead.

KTChampions

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1951

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Great statistics and a selection of users worth reading, thanks!
I was just a day late and didn’t get on the list Grin

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: DdmrDdmr on December 02, 2019, 02:29:51 AM

There is a case I would like to break a lance in favour of: Paxmao (Sr. Member).

I've seen his posts, and indeed, this is well deserved, so I've sent him the required 28 Merit to become Hero Member.

Thanks for this, I was behind in sending enough sMerit to empty my source by December 13. This topic helped a lot Cheesy

DdmrDdmr

legendary

Activity: 2338

Merit: 10802

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on December 01, 2019, 01:16:37 PM

There are also users some users have received required merits for a certain rank, but they have not ranked up due to their low activity. Many of them are likely close to higher ranks.
<…>

Correct, you can see all of them here: https://public.tableau.com/shared/3PF47Y5JP?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link
There are 24 Full Members that have the merits but not the activity to rank-up (not crossed against banned on the Merit Dashboard). You can play around with the “Current Rank” filter to see them all.

The idea of the OP is to focus specifically on those that need some merits to rank-up (less than 20%). The ones you indicate do not meet that criteria, and therefore are not listed. It would be easy to create another list of the kind, but mixing them up here would distort the nature of the OP really.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on December 01, 2019, 01:29:11 PM

<…> The only thing is that it'd be better if the member's username was clickable. <…>

I agree. The thing is that putting the amount of fields I’ve place in the lists on a table type structure would not fit (no scrolling). The fastest around would be to use the complete list, where you can click to each profile easily: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1avCPrDn05kM9ezrtU-IoyOgDAsbmwXBXAgyoJoGLkNM/edit?usp=sharing

Note: I am pretty mean with merit awarding in large chunks. I’ll eventually get there I figure when I have less time. There is a case I would like to break a lance in favour of: Paxmao (Sr. Member). I don’t think he cares for rank at all, and he’s pretty inactive lately, but has been a selfless person for quite a long time awarding merits, until, I figure, other priorities took over the tremendous task he’s been doing (sent 3,220 sMerits to 756 profiles). Ranked-up(thanks to @LoyceV)

Assface16678

full member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 136

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Since I think this is helping thread for members that is close on ranking-up, I am a member rank close to becoming a full member! I only need 5 merits to became a Full member.
If you want to view my post history and merit what you see that is deserving to receive some merits please do

Thank you everyone! Hoping I will see my name there soon. Thanks!

edandrada

member

Activity: 1036

Merit: 18

hello.

thanks eveyone who helps other in this subject

Juggy777

hero member

Activity: 2646

Merit: 686

@DdmrDdmr thank you so much for mentioning my name in this list Grin

, it’s been a long wait for me but it seems finally I’ll be able to rank up as I have been promised a huge bounty by the merits god i.e. @TMAN. Also I’m hoping that in coming months I’ll find my name once again listed here in the members close to legendary rank category, as my long term target is to become a legendary member out here.

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Quote from: hugeblack on December 02, 2019, 12:18:57 AM

Thanks for preparing this list, I will spend about 20 Merits to help some members to rank-up.
I checked (Hero Members & Sr. Members) and didn’t find any member need less than 20 Merits so I moved to Full Members.

This List:

@darosior >> 248 Merits >> 2 Merits.
@breko974 >> 9 >> 1 Merit
@SlushPool official >> 9>> 1Merit

It seems that it is difficult to find active members who create high-quality posts even with these filters.

sir
There is a friend from the Turkish section who writes quality messages

he have 225 merit
Can you support @lossnet

is a good member and has nice quality posts.

----------
and @gospodin
he have 418 merit
@gospodin humble, humorous, knowledgeable, thoughtful, respected member

thank you very much

hugeblack

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 3983

Thanks for preparing this list, I will spend about 20 Merits to help some members to rank-up.
I checked (Hero Members & Sr. Members) and didn’t find any member need less than 20 Merits so I moved to Full Members.

This List:

@darosior >> 248 Merits >> 2 Merits.
@breko974 >> 9 >> 1 Merit
@SlushPool official >> 9>> 1Merit

It seems that it is difficult to find active members who create high-quality posts even with these filters.

kawetsriyanto

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 1086

duelbits.com

Quote from: hosseinimr93 on December 01, 2019, 10:51:27 PM

It is already mentioned in the OP.

Quote from: DdmrDdmr on December 01, 2019, 11:40:17 AM

- I’ve created a "status" column that indicated if the profile has logged-in over the last 30 days (Active), 30 to 90 days (Semi-active) or over 90 days ago (inactive). This is just to get an approximate idea if the profile is still with us or not these days.

OMG, I am just aware of it now.
Thank you so much for reminding me, mate.

I've edited my question since the previous one was like a very poor mistake.
Sorry for my bad. Cheesy

wolwoo

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1148

Yesterday I became a Hero. legendary soon Wink

I was chosen DT1 last month
I applied for merit source >>> wolwoo's merit source desire I waiting for your supports

Many thanks to all of you....

hosseinimr93

legendary

Activity: 2380

Merit: 5213

Quote from: kawetsriyanto on December 01, 2019, 09:20:32 PM

I have a little question. I see on the table that there is three status of listed members [Active, Semi-active, & Inactive].
I have no question for the "Active" one, but I am curious how you determine the status "Semi-active or Inactive"?

It is already mentioned in the OP.

Quote from: DdmrDdmr on December 01, 2019, 11:40:17 AM

- I’ve created a "status" column that indicated if the profile has logged-in over the last 30 days (Active), 30 to 90 days (Semi-active) or over 90 days ago (inactive). This is just to get an approximate idea if the profile is still with us or not these days.

kawetsriyanto

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 1086

duelbits.com

I see on the table that there is three status of listed members [Active, Semi-active, & Inactive].
~~I have no question for the "Active" one, but I am curious how you determine the status "Semi-active or Inactive"?~~

These may also be indicator of the status

Active : Log in to forum regularly.
Semi-active : Rarely log in to forum. May be twice a week, three times in a month, or so on.
Inactive : Never log in more than a year. Or never come back to forum since the last active day [for months/years].

[EDITED]

I am proud to see that some members coming from my local board. And some of them are truly the most influential members to improve my local board.
Good luck for them!!!

DireWolfM14

copper member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 4543

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Focusing on the members with enough activity for legendary rank, there are some good candidates there. DaveF is a good one to help out, he makes some good posts in the technical sections.

FFrankie

hero member

Activity: 2254

Merit: 960

100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!

Quote from: LoyceV on December 01, 2019, 01:08:29 PM

I checked the top of the list to see if I could rank them up. The first candidate was a Merit abuser. The second candidate just ranked up already. The third too. The next one posts in Russian only, so I can't read it, followed by someone posting in Arabic, and the next user got inactive after receiving negative feedback.

That leaves only 2 Hero Members who need quite a lot to rank up, so I'll take theymos slightly out of context again:

Quote from: theymos on January 26, 2018, 01:06:49 PM

But undoubtedly some people got screwed by this, and if they have decent posts, by all means, give them the 250 or 500 merit that they need to rank-up.

Those 2: hatshepsut93 ~~needs~~ needed 32 and figmentofmyass ~~needs~~ needed 38. Update: done!

I don't want to spend the rest of my evening reading posts, so I've just re-merited many of the posts that I already Merited (and this could be a long time ago).

Welcome to being Legendary!

/just Merit source things Cheesy

I believe I should be legendary. Lol

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: LoyceV on December 01, 2019, 01:08:29 PM

Those 2: hatshepsut93 needs 32 and figmentofmyass needs 38.

figmentofmyass has 1000 merits now (thanks to you) and I guess just ranked up because of that--nice job helping him out. I would have probably dropped some merits on him if you hadn't done it.

I've been trying to help out hatshepsut93 here and there, as he's a member who usually makes good posts and deserves to rank up IMO. I'll have to check his profile next. *Edit: well, looks like he's got his 1000 merits as well*

This is an excellent list, OP. The only thing is that it'd be better if the member's username was clickable. Either way it's great info and I'm going to be sifting through it when I get some time.

Topic: Bitcointalk Ranking-up pipeline- Those close to their next rank (lacking Merits) - page 25. (Read 18726 times)