Bitcoin Forum>Other>Meta
Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes (Read 1841 times)

Mitchell
copper member
Activity: 3948
Merit: 2201
Verified awesomeness ✔
Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 07:45:58 PM
#29
Quote from: jackjack on August 23, 2013, 07:43:40 PM
Ok I found why: I update the list of usernames only when http://jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/list is called
I'll change that but until then you can load the page yourself to refresh if it bothers you



Quote from: Mitchell on August 23, 2013, 07:36:30 PM
I found myself! Not that I have any use for the voting list, because I cannot see who voted for me ;p
It could be funny to add the possibility to send a message to people who voted for you
That would be a great feature to discuss things. For example, ask why someone gave you a -1 and try to fix the situation.
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 07:43:40 PM
#28
Ok I found why: I update the list of usernames only when http://jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/list is called
I'll change that but until then you can load the page yourself to refresh if it bothers you



Quote from: Mitchell on August 23, 2013, 07:36:30 PM
I found myself! Not that I have any use for the voting list, because I cannot see who voted for me ;p
It could be funny to add the possibility to send a message to people who voted for you
Mitchell
copper member
Activity: 3948
Merit: 2201
Verified awesomeness ✔
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 07:36:30 PM
#27
I found myself! Not that I have any use for the voting list, because I cannot see who voted for me.
I am still in favor of the show who voted for you option, just because I can thank a person who +1'ed me and talk with the person who gave me an -1.
nimda
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
0xFB0D8D1534241423
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 07:30:55 PM
#26
Quote from: jackjack on August 23, 2013, 11:15:47 AM
Some users can't be resolved and are displayed as '??'
Not sure why this happen but it's not critical as their link is correct

To everybody:
Please confirm you found your list
I do!

I'm not finding my list. I voted +1 for gollum (he was 0/0), reloaded the list, and ctrl+f'd for him. Nothing.

Please tell me when this is resolved so I can remove that vote, because I've never encountered him. Thanks.

Edit: nevermind, gollum was showing up as ??
tysat
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
Keep it real
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 11:39:33 AM
#25
Looks good to me now!
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 11:15:47 AM
#24
Some users can't be resolved and are displayed as '??'
Not sure why this happen but it's not critical as their link is correct

To everybody:
Please confirm you found your list
I do!
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 11:10:23 AM
#23
Oh wait the script is broken... There are only 11 lists

Fixed Grin
Thanks for catching that
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 11:06:34 AM
#22
Quote from: tysat on August 23, 2013, 11:00:54 AM
Quote from: jackjack on August 23, 2013, 10:58:36 AM
Vote locked
The 'Hidden' option won
Here are the lists: http://jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/voteslist.php

Is this an older list?  Because I'm not seeing my votes on there, or at least it's missing a recent one that I was using to search for mine.

Nope, it should always be up-to-date
Are you sure your vote was taken into account?
Is there a special character in his username? (I know that Goat works though so this shouldn't be the cause)
tysat
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
Keep it real
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 11:00:54 AM
#21
Quote from: jackjack on August 23, 2013, 10:58:36 AM
Vote locked
The 'Hidden' option won
Here are the lists: http://jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/voteslist.php

Is this an older list?  Because I'm not seeing my votes on there, or at least it's missing a recent one that I was using to search for mine.
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 23, 2013, 10:58:36 AM
#20
Vote locked
The 'Hidden' option won
Here are the lists: http://jackjack.alwaysdata.net/btoplusone/voteslist.php
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 07:02:49 AM
#19
Quote from: favdesu on August 21, 2013, 06:35:58 AM
Quote from: jackjack on August 21, 2013, 06:31:01 AM
Actually I think 84 is the right lower limit.
It requires an account to be 2.5 months old and to post 84 posts. I think it's enough to have a bit of legitimity. I'll add a whitelist anyway.

Thoughts?

I'd say something around 50 (1 month) should be fine too Cheesy

I prefer having a high limit and a big whitelist than a low limit and a big blacklist
For now it's not critical but I fear what will happen when I'll automate registrations
favdesu
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 06:35:58 AM
#18
Quote from: jackjack on August 21, 2013, 06:31:01 AM
Actually I think 84 is the right lower limit.
It requires an account to be 2.5 months old and to post 84 posts. I think it's enough to have a bit of legitimity. I'll add a whitelist anyway.

Thoughts?

I'd say something around 50 (1 month) should be fine too Cheesy
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 06:31:01 AM
#17
Actually I think 84 is the right lower limit.
It requires an account to be 2.5 months old and to post 84 posts. I think it's enough to have a bit of legitimity. I'll add a whitelist anyway.

Thoughts?
favdesu
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 06:17:44 AM
#16
Quote from: jackjack on August 21, 2013, 06:06:08 AM
Quote from: favdesu on August 21, 2013, 05:55:22 AM
Quote from: jackjack on August 21, 2013, 05:53:56 AM
Now that I'm thinking about it I'm not sure I want newbies being able to vote at all


+1 - just let them watch but not vote.

I'll put a minimum activity to vote. Say.... 85 Grin

I DARE YOU
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 06:06:08 AM
#15
Quote from: favdesu on August 21, 2013, 05:55:22 AM
Quote from: jackjack on August 21, 2013, 05:53:56 AM
Now that I'm thinking about it I'm not sure I want newbies being able to vote at all


+1 - just let them watch but not vote.

I'll put a minimum activity to vote. Say.... 85 Grin
favdesu
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 05:55:22 AM
#14
Quote from: jackjack on August 21, 2013, 05:53:56 AM
Now that I'm thinking about it I'm not sure I want newbies being able to vote at all


+1 - just let them watch but not vote.
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 05:53:56 AM
#13
Now that I'm thinking about it I'm not sure I want newbies being able to vote at all
whiskers75
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 502
Doesn't use these forums that often.
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 21, 2013, 03:18:51 AM
#12
If a lot of newbies are spam-voting one person, I should be able to set in preferences "Ignore votes from group: Newbies" or something of the sort.
jackjack
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280
May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 20, 2013, 03:49:59 PM
#11
Quote from: BadBear on August 16, 2013, 10:21:57 AM
I like this idea the best, opening it will just mean more drama and fake votes from retaliation (disclosure, haven't used it yet).
I'll wait for more votes but I think I'll chose this option

Quote from: whiskers75 on August 18, 2013, 12:26:14 PM
Add the option to hide votes from one group/user
I don't understand what you mean
whiskers75
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 502
Doesn't use these forums that often.
Re: Bitcointalk++ script - Thoughts about votes
August 18, 2013, 12:26:14 PM
#10
Quote from: BadBear on August 16, 2013, 10:21:57 AM
Quote from: jackjack on August 16, 2013, 09:41:12 AM
Quote from: ?? on ??
I prefer the "Hidden" option.  It can be seen from the comments in the trust system that when someone gets negative feedback they often give back negative feedback.  The private option would stop the tit-for-tat of -1 votes.

Another option could be to publicly show the votes from each of the member groups.  This way no one can tell who voted for whom and it would help stop people gaming the system using socks.  For example, the following distribution would look a little suspicious:

member123 [+5]
Brand New:   [+10, -0]
Newbie:   [+0, -0]
Jr. Member:   [+0, -0]
Member:   [+0, -0]
Full Member:   [+0, -0]
Sr. Member:   [+0, -0]
Hero Member:   [+0, -5]

I will do this. Not sure how yet but it's definitely something worth implementing.
It's not critical for now as I manually send passwords to people asking for them.

I like this idea the best, opening it will just mean more drama and fake votes from retaliation (disclosure, haven't used it yet).

Add the option to hide votes from one group/user
Pages:
Bitcoin Forum>Other>Meta
Jump to: