BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 24.

COBRAS

member

Activity: 873

Merit: 22

$$P2P BTC BRUTE.JOIN NOW ! https://uclck.me/SQPJk

Quote from: fxsniper on May 14, 2022, 06:38:41 AM

Why do all programs/tools about bitcoin all-time download chrome browser warning to download and recommend deleting a file?
What algorithms or some code makes the browser check it and think can be harm the computer.
it happens with tools download from Github and open source code, bitcrack, kangaroo all get warning all-time download it.

Because they have your BTC stealer inside...

albert0bsd

hero member

Activity: 862

Merit: 662

Never run exe files of untrusted sources, if there are source available is better to compile it by yourself

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Why do all programs/tools about bitcoin all-time download chrome browser warning to download and recommend deleting a file?
What algorithms or some code makes the browser check it and think can be harm the computer.
it happens with tools download from Github and open source code, bitcrack, kangaroo all get warning all-time download it.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: math09183 on May 12, 2022, 09:17:30 AM

There is no single tool which he is the author. There is no one single program written by him.
If you want reliability - go and find the original version, from the tool's author, not from that xero guy.
Maybe he has small dick or other complexes and that's why he is not using "fork" option on source repos, he wants projects to look like they were made by him?

I respect him for amount of time he must spend to monitor source repos and copy/paste diffs Cheesy

So guys, you do not need to worry about virus or other bug hidden in his closed wif500 program, he is not able to do something like that.

I didn't check the repos (Github is a PITA to browse through lynx) but I can conclude two things from this:

a - if the programs are open-source, then he just coppied the Git tree - anyone can do that. The commits still appear (unless you destroy the tree and create a new one - in which case nobody would really think you wrote the whole thing in 1 commit anyway) if you do a git log, so it's just a nuisance.
b - the programs are all closed source like that sp-mod guy. In which case the most risk that would come from using it would be the code sending the rewards to some baked address inside the code (or if he is sufficiently insane, maybe he includes a piece of malware like the node-ipc maintainer).

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 237

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: CryptoSh1va on May 12, 2022, 01:35:16 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on May 12, 2022, 11:02:12 AM

It will be interesting to see/read about the wif500 and if they solve it.

I think it's just a clever scam.
The author claims that the photo is from a burnt diary in 2017, but the Ethereum address in the same photo was used in 2021, and just one day.
Why write this address and key in a diary if there was no balance on it at the time?
And even more so to use it after so many years..

0x428d88b326748ebd55c4a7f89fd3bc08378dc0d2

Well, outside looking in, whoever's address, they could still use it because they had the full private key and normally you create a wallet before there is a balance on it, whereas the btc address in question is missing the first part of the wif private key. I dunno...it will be interesting to see if the coins move anytime soon. As well as #64 and #120

CryptoSh1va

jr. member

Activity: 33

Merit: 7

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on May 12, 2022, 11:02:12 AM

It will be interesting to see/read about the wif500 and if they solve it.

I think it's just a clever scam.
The author claims that the photo is from a burnt diary in 2017, but the Ethereum address in the same photo was used in 2021, and just one day.
Why write this address and key in a diary if there was no balance on it at the time?
And even more so to use it after so many years..

0x428d88b326748ebd55c4a7f89fd3bc08378dc0d2

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 237

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: math09183 on May 12, 2022, 09:17:30 AM

Quote from: bigvito19 on May 12, 2022, 08:50:38 AM

If his tools work, they work. If the challenge is fake or if you think its fake just don't participate in it.

There is no single tool which he is the author. There is no one single program written by him.
If you want reliability - go and find the original version, from the tool's author, not from that xero guy.
Maybe he has small dick or other complexes and that's why he is not using "fork" option on source repos, he wants projects to look like they were made by him?

copy	original
https://github.com/phrutis/Rotor-Cuda	https://github.com/kanhavishva/KeyHunt-Cuda
https://github.com/phrutis/Fialka	again https://github.com/kanhavishva/KeyHunt-Cuda
https://github.com/phrutis/WifSolverCuda	https://github.com/PawelGorny/WifSolverCuda
https://github.com/phrutis/Minikeys	https://github.com/PawelGorny/MinikeyCuda
https://github.com/phrutis/Collider	https://github.com/Etayson/BSGS-cuda
https://github.com/phrutis/VanitySearch2	https://github.com/phrutis/VanitySearch2
https://github.com/phrutis/BSGS	https://github.com/Mezantrop74/BSGS
https://github.com/phrutis/BIPsImplementation	https://github.com/BilawalAhmed0900/BIPsImplementation
https://github.com/phrutis/PubHunt	https://github.com/kanhavishva/PubHunt

I respect him for amount of time he must spend to monitor source repos and copy/paste diffs Cheesy

So guys, you do not need to worry about virus or other bug hidden in his closed wif500 program, he is not able to do something like that.

I've looked at two of his repos; they are different than the originals and he gave credit to original programmer.
If you take an existing program and change it to different things, is that a fork or a new master? I do not know...I imagine you could fork and make changes.
It will be interesting to see/read about the wif500 and if they solve it.

math09183

member

Activity: 170

Merit: 58

Quote from: bigvito19 on May 12, 2022, 08:50:38 AM

If his tools work, they work. If the challenge is fake or if you think its fake just don't participate in it.

There is no single tool which he is the author. There is no one single program written by him.
If you want reliability - go and find the original version, from the tool's author, not from that xero guy.
Maybe he has small dick or other complexes and that's why he is not using "fork" option on source repos, he wants projects to look like they were made by him?

copy	original
https://github.com/phrutis/Rotor-Cuda	https://github.com/kanhavishva/KeyHunt-Cuda
https://github.com/phrutis/Fialka	again https://github.com/kanhavishva/KeyHunt-Cuda
https://github.com/phrutis/WifSolverCuda	https://github.com/PawelGorny/WifSolverCuda
https://github.com/phrutis/Minikeys	https://github.com/PawelGorny/MinikeyCuda
https://github.com/phrutis/Collider	https://github.com/Etayson/BSGS-cuda
https://github.com/phrutis/VanitySearch2	https://github.com/phrutis/VanitySearch2
https://github.com/phrutis/BSGS	https://github.com/Mezantrop74/BSGS
https://github.com/phrutis/BIPsImplementation	https://github.com/BilawalAhmed0900/BIPsImplementation
https://github.com/phrutis/PubHunt	https://github.com/kanhavishva/PubHunt

I respect him for amount of time he must spend to monitor source repos and copy/paste diffs Cheesy

So guys, you do not need to worry about virus or other bug hidden in his closed wif500 program, he is not able to do something like that.

bigvito19

full member

Activity: 706

Merit: 111

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: math09183 on May 12, 2022, 05:36:55 AM

Quote from: bigvito19 on May 11, 2022, 01:37:31 PM

You can use this too for Hash160 https://github.com/phrutis/Rotor-Cuda you can use a GPU with this.

Use whatever you want, just not from that russian thief. All he does is copy/paste from other repos (not fork), he changes name and says like it belongs to him.

I also cannot recommend his tools, especially when he ran shady brute-force challenge[1]. But i'm not sure he can be called thief when AFAIK he don't violate original repository license. Although i can understand uneasiness that he don't use GitHub fork feature when the original source code also hosted on GitHub.

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/challenge-or-scam-or-nothing-5394745

If his tools work, they work. If the challenge is fake or if you think its fake just don't participate in it.

math09183

member

Activity: 170

Merit: 58

Quote from: bigvito19 on May 11, 2022, 01:37:31 PM

Quote from: fxsniper on May 11, 2022, 03:06:25 AM

Quote from: stanner.austin on May 11, 2022, 02:54:06 AM

@fxsniper
Hello
You won't notice much speed difference on this case.
Only thing pubkey bruteforce fastest is BSGS, because it's come after only 1 step(value*G). no need double SHA2,RIPEMD160,BASE8
address or RIPEMD160 won't make much noticeable difference in bruteforce.

OK, I just think simple maybe calculate SHA-256 and RIPEMD160 it is maybe fast that Elliptic curve point calculate
I think with 1 step(value*G). it is calculated 256 times (loop) for each bit maybe make full key brute-force slow

You can use this too for Hash160 https://github.com/phrutis/Rotor-Cuda you can use a GPU with this.

Use whatever you want, just not from that russian ~~thief~~. All he does is copy/paste from other repos (not fork), he changes name and says like it belongs to him.

bigvito19

full member

Activity: 706

Merit: 111

Quote from: fxsniper on May 11, 2022, 03:06:25 AM

Quote from: stanner.austin on May 11, 2022, 02:54:06 AM

@fxsniper
Hello
You won't notice much speed difference on this case.
Only thing pubkey bruteforce fastest is BSGS, because it's come after only 1 step(value*G). no need double SHA2,RIPEMD160,BASE8
address or RIPEMD160 won't make much noticeable difference in bruteforce.

OK, I just think simple maybe calculate SHA-256 and RIPEMD160 it is maybe fast that Elliptic curve point calculate
I think with 1 step(value*G). it is calculated 256 times (loop) for each bit maybe make full key brute-force slow

You can use this too for Hash160 https://github.com/phrutis/Rotor-Cuda you can use a GPU with this.

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: stanner.austin on May 11, 2022, 02:54:06 AM

@fxsniper
Hello
You won't notice much speed difference on this case.
Only thing pubkey bruteforce fastest is BSGS, because it's come after only 1 step(value*G). no need double SHA2,RIPEMD160,BASE8
address or RIPEMD160 won't make much noticeable difference in bruteforce.

OK, I just think simple maybe calculate SHA-256 and RIPEMD160 it is maybe fast that Elliptic curve point calculate
I think with 1 step(value*G). it is calculated 256 times (loop) for each bit maybe make full key brute-force slow

stanner.austin

member

Activity: 69

Merit: 53

@fxsniper
Hello
You won't notice much speed difference on this case.
Only thing pubkey bruteforce fastest is BSGS, because it's come after only 1 step(value*G). no need double SHA2,RIPEMD160,BASE8
address or RIPEMD160 won't make much noticeable difference in bruteforce.

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: iceland2k14 on May 10, 2022, 11:48:07 PM

There are already 2 Tools out there which can do exactly the same.

1. https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt in the pub2rmd mode. This is for CPU.

Code:

./keyhunt -m pub2rmd

2. https://github.com/kanhavishva/PubHunt This is for GPU

thank iceland2k14
I will try keyhunt

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: sssergy2705 on May 11, 2022, 12:02:40 AM

The problem is that in this way it is impossible to set the range for generation. It's like pointing your finger at the sky to find the one star you need out of billions.

thank you sssergy2705

right, it is very hard to find with 256-bit number

sssergy2705

copper member

Activity: 205

Merit: 1

Quote from: iceland2k14 on May 10, 2022, 11:48:07 PM

Quote from: fxsniper on May 10, 2022, 09:59:27 PM

my idea try to calculate sort can possible
1. random X
2. calculate Y from X
3. hash SHA-256
4. hash RIPEMD-160
5. check the match search

There are already 2 Tools out there which can do exactly the same.

1. https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt in the pub2rmd mode. This is for CPU.

Code:

./keyhunt -m pub2rmd

2. https://github.com/kanhavishva/PubHunt This is for GPU

The problem is that in this way it is impossible to set the range for generation. It's like pointing your finger at the sky to find the one star you need out of billions.

iceland2k14

jr. member

Activity: 36

Merit: 68

Quote from: fxsniper on May 10, 2022, 09:59:27 PM

my idea try to calculate sort can possible
1. random X
2. calculate Y from X
3. hash SHA-256
4. hash RIPEMD-160
5. check the match search

There are already 2 Tools out there which can do exactly the same.

1. https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt in the pub2rmd mode. This is for CPU.

Code:

./keyhunt -m pub2rmd

2. https://github.com/kanhavishva/PubHunt This is for GPU

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 237

Shooters Shoot...

Quote

my idea try to calculate sort can possible
1. random X
2. calculate Y from X
3. hash SHA-256
4. hash RIPEMD-160
5. check the match search

So you want:

random privkey
calculate pubkey from random privkey
sha
and then RIPEMD160

Correct?

There are programs out there that search for H160 already. The problem becomes the "pure" randomness.

I know albertobsd's keyhunt program will allow you to load a H160 to search for and it has the random (CPU cores are better/faster with the "absolute" randomness) option.

Programs like vanitysearch and bitcrack, take the inputted address and convert it to H160 and that's what it searches for, but it's hard to do a true (absolute as you call it), check one random key and then jump to another random key with a GPU; most programs will/can put a GPU thread on a random point but it normally checks thousands or millions of consecutive keys before rekeying or re-randomizing the GPU threads.

fxsniper

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 47

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on May 10, 2022, 01:04:02 PM

You want a program to randomly create a public key and then search for it's corresponding H160?

Yes, please
maybe puzzle 64-100 without pubkey can be useful to solve

free stye to code as you want or easy to code (with GPU)

problem with full calculate like bitcrack it is calculated puzzle#64 from first bit to bit 64 (or any bit 356) it uses to may loop over 200 to calculate double and add multiply, made it slow to brute-forcing

maybe someone can use this too found it (dot point trillion one percent possible)

my idea try to calculate sort can possible
1. random X
2. calculate Y from X
3. hash SHA-256
4. hash RIPEMD-160
5. check the match search

I am not sure I write step correct or not

With GPU calculate How many pubkey scans can do per minute?

option may be up to you code begins with easy first for open testing and then modify to option later
option
1. absolute random
2. random in the range
3. run number X (+1 next like bitcrack)

for check match RIPEMD-160 search
1. full match with "3EE4133D991F52FDF6A25C9834E0745AC74248A4"
2. vanity math like "3EE4133D991F5" (from 3EE4133D991F52FDF6A25C9834E0745AC74248A4)

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 237

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: fxsniper on May 10, 2022, 10:01:11 AM

Can any body help to create tools brute-forcing by using GPU NVidia from random Public ECDSA Key to RIPEMD-160 Hash and vanity search
RIPEMD-160 Hash
just test random idea to brute-forcing puzzle 64 and use kangaroo solve it ( I know it is not work, but would be test to know it sure to not work)

You want a program to randomly create a public key and then search for it's corresponding H160?

Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 24. (Read 76581 times)