BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 63.

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 219

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: NotATether on February 10, 2021, 01:38:56 PM

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 12:28:34 PM

Also I was getting 1000mk/s on 1080ti on vanity search but only 300mk/s on bitcrack. What is this that slow? As far as I know vanity search only have to compare first 4-6 characters and this has to compare whole address. Is that the only reason for this slowness or something else in the implementation?

I can't help you choose parameters because I don't have any of those, still trying to find a way to lease a GPU for bitcoin (turns out it's very hard to find someone who's not trying to sell you a miner Undecided

). But the reason why VanitySearch is much faster than this is not related to the number of characters they are comparing, it's due to the fact that Jean_Luc's code generates a "jump table" of secp256k1 points (see e.g. GPU/Group.h) so he avoids actually doing the elliptic curve math at runtime, unlike brichard's code. This is despite both their engines being written in CUDA.

In VanitySearch he also writes all his math in assembly code while Bitcrack uses C for its math functions.

Several pages back somebody posted here that they used -b 112 -t 512 -p 512 for their 1080 and got similar speeds as you.

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 12:28:34 PM

BTW, kinda offtopic. My python implementation (<50 lines) using external libs is doing only 100 keys/sec (on single cpu core) and also I noticed official c/python implementations also do around 1000 keys/sec while generating. What makes these generators a thousand/million times faster? Is it just a simple trick or years worth of dev? Give some pointers maybe.

Are your python files compiled? Try doing that so that your code doesn't have to be interpreted at runtime, using python -m compileall YOUR_PY_FILES.

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 12:28:34 PM

Also while running on windows, it is not showing any cpu/gpu/memory. Why is that?

What do you mean? Bitcrack never printed how much CPU or memory it uses in the console. Do you mean in Task Manager? If so then you'll usually find it as a child process of Windows Command Processor (and Task Manager is going to show that using a lot of resources but it's actually the child process running inside it using all that).

You also have to realize, VanitySearch is searching more than just Point. It is searching Point + endo1 + endo2 + symmetry ( pt.y.ModNeg; p1.y.ModNeg; and p2.y.ModNeg; It's a different animal than Bitcrack, hence what seems like super speed compared to Bitcrack. Just different designs and purposes. One is point by point the other is 6 points.

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 219

Shooters Shoot...

Quote

Unable to open 'address.txt'
Can you help me out pls.

if you are using exact commands from above, the address list was titled "-i addresses.txt" (addresses, not address) but whatever the file you have your addresses in, that's what you need to specify using the -i command. Example, if your addresses are stored in apple.txt document, then you would use
-i apple.txt

jlfv777

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: madmartyk on July 14, 2020, 05:23:38 PM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on July 14, 2020, 02:38:58 PM

Quote from: malikadam on July 14, 2020, 12:58:05 PM

Quote from: ABCbits on July 09, 2020, 09:47:58 AM

Quote from: malikadam on July 08, 2020, 11:56:02 AM

I want the steps on a video with explaining in order to know how can i run it i am not a programmer to understand commands and visual studio etc. even the screenshot on the first page i didn't understand anything from it.

It's not as complicated as you think and you don't have to be a programmer to be able to run the BitCrack. Basically what you need to do are :
1. Download BitCrack from https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack/releases. If you're not sure, just download clBitCrack.exe
2. Open application called "Command Prompt" and move to directory path where clBitCrack.exe is located
3. Type clBitCrack.exe on "Command Prompt"

If you never heard or don't know how to use "Command Prompt", please read this guide https://techtipvault.com/windows/command-prompt-windows-10-cmd-guide/

P.S. i can't make screenshot since i don't use Windows OS

I didn't find clBitCrack.exe

Command Prompt said clBitCrack.exe is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program, or batch file.

If you are running Nvidia cards, use this link to download cuBitCrack.exe

If you are using AMD cards, use this link to download clBitCrack.exe

Create a folder and place one of those .exe files in the folder, along with your input file that contains the addresses you want to search for.
So let's say you create a folder called "BitCrack"; inside there, place one of the .exe files and the input file containing addresses to search for.

Now, create a batch file. Create a new text document and add the commands you want the program to run with. For example:

Code:

cuBitCrack -d 0 -b 64 -t 256 -p 512 --keyspace 8000000000000000:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF -i addresses.txt -o FOUNDKEY.txt

Now save that text document as a .bat file. When you go to save the text doc as bat file, make sure you select the "Save as type:" box as All Files and then save (for example) runbitcrack.bat....it's important to add the .bat extension or you are just saving as a text document and the program will not run.

Once that is done, double click on your new .bat file and the program will run. It may say you need another file such as vcc....; if so, google that file, download it, and place it in the same folder you created (with all these files in it).

Breakdown of .bat file commands:
cuBitCrack - this is the .exe file that you downloaded in first step. It'll either be cuBitCrack or clBitCrack, depending on your video card.
-d 0 - this is telling the program to use the video card numbered 0; if you have more than one card, you can change this to which video card you want to use
-b 64 -t 256 -p 512 - tells program what gridsize you want to use. you will have to experiment with these numbers to fine tune your card but these default numbers will get you started
--keyspace 8000000000000000:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF - this is the keyspace that the program will search in, change it to search the space you want to search
-i addresses.txt - the -i tells program this is your input file; this is where you save the btc addresses you want to search for
-o FOUNDKEY.txt - this -o tells the program you want to save your found keys, in this example, if you find a key, it will save the key in a text file called "FOUNDKEY" . It will save it in the same folder you are running the program from.

edit: the above is for Windows; if you are using Linux/Ubuntu, someone else will have to help you.

Gets to the load address files and dies

Unable to open 'address.txt'
Can you help me out pls.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 01:57:24 PM

What do you mean by lease? You can rent on AWS or some other services cheaper. Try google colab which has free gpus (t4 gpus I guess) but stops every 12 hrs and can run only 1 instance per account.

BTW, any plans for these softwares to be written for ASICs to make them more faster?

I can only pay for hosting with bitcoin which AWS does not support, and I use Google Colab is, well, awkward to make it work for non-Python projects like Bitcrack.

ASICs that are used in bitcoin miners cannot be programmed to run private key crackers because the mining logic is hard coded into the ICs (integrated circuits) inside the ASICs. So you actually have to make a custom ASIC that only makes a table of all RIPEMD160 hashes and searches it for a particular address in order to make it work with a cracker like Bitcrack.

rama_rao

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 1

Yes, I've used those values. What ever tweaks I make is only decreasing the rate. So, asked to know if there is any good doc for that.

Yeah, I was asking about task manager. Everything is normal, cpu 20%, gpu 5% usage and 6gb gpu ram which is good I guess.

What do you mean by lease? You can rent on AWS or some other services cheaper. Try google colab which has free gpus (t4 gpus I guess) but stops every 12 hrs and can run only 1 instance per account.

BTW, any plans for these softwares to be written for ASICs to make them more faster?

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 12:28:34 PM

Also I was getting 1000mk/s on 1080ti on vanity search but only 300mk/s on bitcrack. What is this that slow? As far as I know vanity search only have to compare first 4-6 characters and this has to compare whole address. Is that the only reason for this slowness or something else in the implementation?

I can't help you choose parameters because I don't have any of those, still trying to find a way to lease a GPU for bitcoin (turns out it's very hard to find someone who's not trying to sell you a miner Undecided

). But the reason why VanitySearch is much faster than this is not related to the number of characters they are comparing, it's due to the fact that Jean_Luc's code generates a "jump table" of secp256k1 points (see e.g. GPU/Group.h) so he avoids actually doing the elliptic curve math at runtime, unlike brichard's code. This is despite both their engines being written in CUDA.

In VanitySearch he also writes all his math in assembly code while Bitcrack uses C for its math functions.

Several pages back somebody posted here that they used -b 112 -t 512 -p 512 for their 1080 and got similar speeds as you.

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 12:28:34 PM

BTW, kinda offtopic. My python implementation (<50 lines) using external libs is doing only 100 keys/sec (on single cpu core) and also I noticed official c/python implementations also do around 1000 keys/sec while generating. What makes these generators a thousand/million times faster? Is it just a simple trick or years worth of dev? Give some pointers maybe.

Are your python files compiled? Try doing that so that your code doesn't have to be interpreted at runtime, using python -m compileall YOUR_PY_FILES.

Quote from: rama_rao on February 10, 2021, 12:28:34 PM

Also while running on windows, it is not showing any cpu/gpu/memory. Why is that?

What do you mean? Bitcrack never printed how much CPU or memory it uses in the console. Do you mean in Task Manager? If so then you'll usually find it as a child process of Windows Command Processor (and Task Manager is going to show that using a lot of resources but it's actually the child process running inside it using all that).

rama_rao

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 1

Hey guys what is the ideal -b -t -p settings for 1080ti and v100 gpus?

They should be better documented or selected automatically like vanity search.

Also I was getting 1000mk/s on 1080ti on vanity search but only 300mk/s on bitcrack. What is this that slow? As far as I know vanity search only have to compare first 4-6 characters and this has to compare whole address. Is that the only reason for this slowness or something else in the implementation?

BTW, kinda offtopic. My python implementation (<50 lines) using external libs is doing only 100 keys/sec (on single cpu core) and also I noticed official c/python implementations also do around 1000 keys/sec while generating. What makes these generators a thousand/million times faster? Is it just a simple trick or years worth of dev? Give some pointers maybe.

Also while running on windows, it is not showing any cpu/gpu/memory. Why is that?

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: MeBender on February 06, 2021, 03:00:41 PM

hey so I decided to upgrade BitCrack to CUDA 11.2 to see if it would improve my performance but nope, originally I was getting 216Mkey/s on my 1070 but after compiling for CUDA 11.2 it was drastically lower 4.2Mkey/s lol

Here's the forked code upgraded to CUDA 11.2 if anyone wants it: https://github.com/GonzoTheDev/BitCrack

What shocks me is that you didn't even edit the CUDA code. Apparently just upgrading the CUDA toolkit is enough to cause performance to drop Shocked

My theory is that CUDA 11 has loosened memory alignment restrictions which causes GPUs running compute capability 6.x and lower to have crippled speeds while they align memory at runtime, however anything running at compute cap 7.x and later has a hard failure on unaligned memory (Presumably they removed those checks to optimize speed).

I'm having a hard time believing that physical GPU hardware is the problem because CUDA abstracts it all away, and besides, sometimes, replacing the OS, entire hardware, and drivers completely fixes the problem on the RTX cards (!!!).

I believe it has something to do with this:

Quote from: https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/cuda-11-features-revealed/

In addition to the enhanced range of precisions, restrictions on matrix dimensions and alignment for Tensor Core acceleration have been removed. For appropriate precisions, the acceleration is now automatic, requiring no user opt-in. The heuristics for cuBLAS automatically adapt to resources when running on the GPU instances with MIG on A100.

Bearing in mind that tensor cores are just special FPU cores and that NVIDIA has to cut down on the number of arithmetic cores to make room for them, *maybe* this is where all the chaos is coming from.

MeBender

jr. member

Activity: 114

Merit: 5

hey so I decided to upgrade BitCrack to CUDA 11.2 to see if it would improve my performance but nope, originally I was getting 216Mkey/s on my 1070 but after compiling for CUDA 11.2 it was drastically lower 4.2Mkey/s lol

Here's the forked code upgraded to CUDA 11.2 if anyone wants it: https://github.com/GonzoTheDev/BitCrack

zahid888

member

Activity: 261

Merit: 19

the right steps towerds the goal

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on February 04, 2021, 11:37:57 AM

Quote from: NotATether on February 04, 2021, 11:32:45 AM

Quote from: TrackMaD on February 04, 2021, 09:31:07 AM

The fear/question has always been, if someone finds the key to #64 and moves it, someone can use the kangaroo and solve it within seconds and gain the private key and give higher trans fee and move it to their own wallet. Make sense?

Better if we do it practically with some tinny amount of bitcoin..

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on February 04, 2021, 11:37:57 AM

So by using Chipmixer, does it change the private key instantly?

No. The way it works is that you send all the balance to the deposit address, thereby emptying the private key. Of course, you should use a high transaction fee to reduce the chance that somebody can start and finish Kangaroo before the transaction is confirmed.

Once the transaction is confirmed then Chipmixer is holding the money at that point. It cannot be taken by a hacker. You then follow the instructions on their site to split up the balance into multiple outputs of different sizes such as 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, etc.

Then you let it do it's mixing activity (which the hackers can't track) and it will send all of the outputs to a private key they created. They will then give you the private keys to import into a wallet. If you don't trust them though you can always move the coins to a second address you have created, and that's private because hackers don't know the private keys you imported in the first place.

Noname400

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: TrackMaD on February 04, 2021, 09:31:07 AM

Need Advice on a Risk Management Question ?
So when we eventually Grin

find the Private Key using BitCrack for any of these Bitcoin challenge transactions,
What will be the best/safest method to import the private key into your own wallet in the quickest possible time ?
eg : To an Exodus Digital Hot wallet or to a cold storage offline wallet or bitcoin core address

I heard that its possible to use transaction fees to redirect an import of private keys to another wallet
since there will be so many hackers sniffing for transactions/keys from these wallets trying to intercept transfers.
Is this possible or highly unlikely ?

Thanks Wink

http://www.sensoria.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/the-adventures-of-robin-hood-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000.jpg

who's stopping you from giving a higher commission? and don't worry about hackers.

WanderingPhilospher

full member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 219

Shooters Shoot...

Quote from: NotATether on February 04, 2021, 11:32:45 AM

Quote from: TrackMaD on February 04, 2021, 09:31:07 AM

Need Advice on a Risk Management Question ?
So when we eventually Grin

find the Private Key using BitCrack for any of these Bitcoin challenge transactions,
What will be the best/safest method to import the private key into your own wallet in the quickest possible time ?
eg : To an Exodus Digital Hot wallet or to a cold storage offline wallet or bitcoin core address

I heard that its possible to use transaction fees to redirect an import of private keys to another wallet
since there will be so many hackers sniffing for transactions/keys from these wallets trying to intercept transfers.
Is this possible or highly unlikely ?

Thanks Wink

You just have to sweep the private key into a mixer (such as Chipmixer) and then import the resulting private keys it gives you into an empty Electrum or Bitcoin Core wallet. A good mixer offers complete privacy from sniffers.

Never ever store large sums of bitcoin in a hot wallet. It's better in that case to send them to an offline wallet on an airgapped computer.

So by using Chipmixer, does it change the private key instantly? The fear/question has always been, if someone finds the key to #64 and moves it, someone can use the kangaroo and solve it within seconds and gain the private key and give higher trans fee and move it to their own wallet. Make sense?

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: TrackMaD on February 04, 2021, 09:31:07 AM

Need Advice on a Risk Management Question ?
So when we eventually Grin

find the Private Key using BitCrack for any of these Bitcoin challenge transactions,
What will be the best/safest method to import the private key into your own wallet in the quickest possible time ?
eg : To an Exodus Digital Hot wallet or to a cold storage offline wallet or bitcoin core address

I heard that its possible to use transaction fees to redirect an import of private keys to another wallet
since there will be so many hackers sniffing for transactions/keys from these wallets trying to intercept transfers.
Is this possible or highly unlikely ?

Thanks Wink

You just have to sweep the private key into a mixer (such as Chipmixer) and then import the resulting private keys it gives you into an empty Electrum or Bitcoin Core wallet. A good mixer offers complete privacy from sniffers.

Never ever store large sums of bitcoin in a hot wallet. It's better in that case to send them to an offline wallet on an airgapped computer.

TrackMaD

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

Need Advice on a Risk Management Question ?
So when we eventually Grin

find the Private Key using BitCrack for any of these Bitcoin challenge transactions,
What will be the best/safest method to import the private key into your own wallet in the quickest possible time ?
eg : To an Exodus Digital Hot wallet or to a cold storage offline wallet or bitcoin core address

I heard that its possible to use transaction fees to redirect an import of private keys to another wallet
since there will be so many hackers sniffing for transactions/keys from these wallets trying to intercept transfers.
Is this possible or highly unlikely ?

Thanks Wink

http://www.sensoria.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/the-adventures-of-robin-hood-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000.jpg

brainless

member

Activity: 313

Merit: 34

one cuda coder bitcoinforktech disapear from 21 jan 2021, anyone know where he go, hope he will be fine, not infected by covid19, if anyone know write here about him for not online from 21 jan

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoinforktech-2863059

renedx

jr. member

Activity: 36

Merit: 3

Quote from: studyroom1 on January 30, 2021, 01:15:08 AM

cuda is not working yet but other gus post there gtx 3060 ti result with CL and that is even more than me , even 2070 with cl is more than mine
wtf

For OpenCL & max out optimized:
A 3090 RTX does ~2000 Mkey/s (overclocked)
A 3090 RTX does ~1800 Mkey/s (normal)
A 3080 RTX does ~1600 Mkey/s (overclocked)
A 3080 RTX does ~1400 Mkey/s (normal)

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: dimsontt on January 29, 2021, 04:12:37 PM

Can someone help please?
is there a way to stop/resume in cmd terminal?
thanks in advance!

Yeah there is, just pass --continue FILENAME to bitcrack and it will save its progress every 60 seconds to the file, and in the case of starting bitcrack with an existing file, it'll load its current keys and working data from there.

Quote from: studyroom1 on January 30, 2021, 01:01:50 AM

why the hell so low speed with max -b 70 -t 512 -p 2078

Someone posted benchmarks of Bitcrack running in OpenCL mode on a bunch of NVIDIA GPUs here and the results were not good. It could be because the OpenCL version does not use the thread and block parameters you pass as these are CUDA-specific things, or maybe the OpenCL implementation of keysearch code was just not hand-tuned, it is still alpha after all. uint256_t is used everywhere inside there and I highly doubt OpenCL has an atomic 256bit int type. Even CUDA only has as large as a 128-bit atomic int so when this stuff is implemented using smaller-sized variables the runtime goes up accordingly.

EDIT: Just checked the code, yeah ClKeySearchDevice.cpp does in fact use threads and blocks but they are not fully parallelized as in CUDA and are only made use of to call the function that generates the starting points and to call the _doStepKernelWithDouble function i.e there is still a loop running on the CPU that generates an ever increasing number of points but the actual computation function is called with the threads and blocks.

Perhaps that explains why the CUDA performance is better.

zahid888

member

Activity: 261

Merit: 19

the right steps towerds the goal

Quote from: studyroom1 on January 30, 2021, 01:15:08 AM

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on January 30, 2021, 01:04:00 AM

Quote from: studyroom1 on January 30, 2021, 01:01:50 AM

why the hell so low speed with max -b 70 -t 512 -p 2078

[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Ending at: FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Compiling OpenCL kernels...
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Initializing GeForce RTX 3080
[2021-01-30.08:55:36] [Info] Generating 74,475,520 starting points (2841.0MB)
[2021-01-30.08:55:42] [Info] 10.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 20.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 30.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 40.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 50.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 60.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 70.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 80.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 90.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:45] [Info] 100.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:45] [Info] Done
[00:00:00] 4545/10240MB | 1 target 780.92 MKey/s

OpenCL versus the Cuda version. clBitCrack versus cuBitCrack; have you tried cuBitCrack?

cuda is not working yet but other gus post there gtx 3060 ti result with CL and that is even more than me , even 2070 with cl is more than mine
wtf

-b 128 -t 256 -p 1024

[2021-01-30.14:44:54] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2021-01-30.14:44:54] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000DDEEE9D0B
[2021-01-30.14:44:54] [Info] Ending at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
[2021-01-30.14:44:54] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001000000000
[2021-01-30.14:44:54] [Info] Compiling OpenCL kernels...
[2021-01-30.14:44:54] [Info] Initializing GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
[2021-01-30.14:44:56] [Info] Generating 33,554,432 starting points (1280.0MB)
[2021-01-30.14:44:59] [Info] 10.0%
[2021-01-30.14:44:59] [Info] 20.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:00] [Info] 30.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:00] [Info] 40.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:00] [Info] 50.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:00] [Info] 60.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:00] [Info] 70.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:00] [Info] 80.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:01] [Info] 90.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:01] [Info] 100.0%
[2021-01-30.14:45:01] [Info] Done
[2021-01-30.14:45:01] [Info] Loading addresses from 'C:/Users/Desktop/1.txt'
[2021-01-30.14:45:01] [Info] 104 addresses loaded (0.0MB)
GeForce RTX 3060 3072 / 8192MB | 104 targets 814.79 MKey/s (23,689,428,992 total) [00:00:27]

maybe you have to use that parameter.. still waiting for cubitcrack

studyroom1

jr. member

Activity: 40

Merit: 7

Quote from: WanderingPhilospher on January 30, 2021, 01:04:00 AM

Quote from: studyroom1 on January 30, 2021, 01:01:50 AM

why the hell so low speed with max -b 70 -t 512 -p 2078

[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Compression: compressed
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Starting at: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Ending at: FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEBAAEDCE6AF48A03BBFD25E8CD0364140
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Counting by: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Compiling OpenCL kernels...
[2021-01-30.08:55:30] [Info] Initializing GeForce RTX 3080
[2021-01-30.08:55:36] [Info] Generating 74,475,520 starting points (2841.0MB)
[2021-01-30.08:55:42] [Info] 10.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 20.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 30.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 40.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:43] [Info] 50.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 60.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 70.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 80.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:44] [Info] 90.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:45] [Info] 100.0%
[2021-01-30.08:55:45] [Info] Done
[00:00:00] 4545/10240MB | 1 target 780.92 MKey/s

OpenCL versus the Cuda version. clBitCrack versus cuBitCrack; have you tried cuBitCrack?

cuda is not working yet but other gus post there gtx 3060 ti result with CL and that is even more than me , even 2070 with cl is more than mine
wtf

Topic: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys - page 63. (Read 74414 times)