Pages:
Author

Topic: BITDICE.ME - REGISTERED CASINO. - page 29. (Read 52274 times)

hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
March 25, 2015, 03:35:36 PM
When I withdraw, it sends me 0.002 CLAM less than I ask for. I guess that's a fee, but it would be nice if it told me when I was withdrawing.

Also, it's 20 times bigger than the fee of 0.0001 CLAM that is actually included in the transaction.

Yeap it uses litcoins fee. I'm gonna add information and lower it. Thanks Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 03:31:40 PM
When I withdraw, it sends me 0.002 CLAM less than I ask for. I guess that's a fee, but it would be nice if it told me when I was withdrawing.

Also, it's 20 times bigger than the fee of 0.0001 CLAM that is actually included in the transaction.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1005
New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit
March 25, 2015, 03:22:29 PM
Here's another little issue:



The game automatically stands for me when I get to 21, but not if I get to soft 21.

Nobody ever wants to hit soft 21, so it seems silly not to auto-stand on it. It might even cause them to mess up split hand play - the indication of which hand is currently active is pretty subtle, and they may incorrectly assume action has passed to the right hand side if the left hand has reached soft 21 already.

Yeah, that is quite possible, especially if you are on fast play mode. Wink
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 03:16:38 PM
Here's another little issue:



The game automatically stands for me when I get to 21, but not if I get to soft 21.

Nobody ever wants to hit soft 21, so it seems silly not to auto-stand on it. It might even cause them to mess up split hand play - the indication of which hand is currently active is pretty subtle, and they may incorrectly assume action has passed to the right hand side if the left hand has reached soft 21 already.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 03:12:31 PM
Doog, this one is fixed too, can you check again? Smiley

Yes, it seems OK now:



I've not seen a soft 17 recently, so I don't know if it's standing or hitting that.
legendary
Activity: 3724
Merit: 1028
The Best Tipster on the Forum!!
March 25, 2015, 02:59:34 PM
Is the site down for anyone else?
no,the site is working for me really fine
maybe its on your end
hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
March 25, 2015, 02:59:18 PM
Alex fixed the "stand on soft 17" bug, but it's still not right:


Doog, this one is fixed too, can you check again? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Designer - Developer
March 25, 2015, 02:58:51 PM
Is the site down for anyone else?
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 02:52:22 PM
Alex fixed the "stand on soft 17" bug, but it's still not right:

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 01:15:04 PM

Code:
$ ruby bitdice2.rb
["7C", "4D", "2S", "10S", "9C", ...]

Wow, really strange, that's my output of the exact code, and it's the same as on server:

Code:
~ » ruby -v
ruby 2.1.5p273 (2014-11-13 revision 48405) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
~ » ruby v.rb
["9C", "3S", "2S", "3D", "4H", ...]

Can you tell me your ruby version?

Code:
$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.3p484 (2013-11-22 revision 43786) [x86_64-linux]

Edit: if I use ruby2.0, it works:

Code:
$ ruby2.0 -v
ruby 2.0.0p384 (2014-01-12) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
$ ruby2.0 ~/Source/Ruby/bitdice2.rb
["9C", "3S", "2S", "3D", "4H", ...]

Debian calls the package "ruby2.0".

Edit2:

Here's a tidier version of the ruby script:

Code:
require 'digest'

SECRET='7fc84a2d8dbf0d50b79bd771677354dd85b1b64129f6f54f7fb4def6973aba2598044eaa826a6020d41be7ec255e88b43c1b0afc2522c657aa6922b7852414d6'
USER_SEED='everymagicseed'
USER_ID='8798'
USER_BET_NUMBER='73'

deck = (%w[AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS] + %w[AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH] +
        %w[AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD] + %w[AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC]) * 8

bet_hash = Digest::SHA512.hexdigest (SECRET + ':' + USER_SEED + ':' + USER_ID + ':' + USER_BET_NUMBER)
random = Random.new(bet_hash.to_i(16))
deck.shuffle!(random: random)

p deck[0,20]

There's no need to write the full 8 decks out. You can just write it once and *8 it.

Edit3: or as a 'one-liner':

Code:
require 'digest'

SECRET='7fc84a2d8dbf0d50b79bd771677354dd85b1b64129f6f54f7fb4def6973aba2598044eaa826a6020d41be7ec255e88b43c1b0afc2522c657aa6922b7852414d6'
USER_SEED='everymagicseed'
USER_ID='8798'
USER_BET_NUMBER='71'

p ((%w[AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS] +
    %w[AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH] +
    %w[AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD] +
    %w[AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC]) * 8)
  .shuffle!(random: Random.new(Digest::SHA512.hexdigest(SECRET+':'+USER_SEED+':'+USER_ID+':'+USER_BET_NUMBER).to_i(16)))[0,20]
hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
March 25, 2015, 01:13:37 PM
How does BitDice generate enough income to cover this? It looks like even all the BTC from your investment as well as commission on profits wouldn't even come close to covering it.

It seems to me the only important question is whether bitdice is still solvent.

I expect they publish a weekly list of investor balances, and publish their cold wallet address, so it shouldn't be too hard to check.

If they don't do this, investors should demand that they do. Nobody wants to invest in an insolvent dice site.

We are solvent doog, coldwallet in the first post in this thread, it contains > 90% of the investor funds, and yeap, I should regularly post anonymous stats of the investor balances. I did it but not frequently enough.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 01:10:25 PM
How does BitDice generate enough income to cover this? It looks like even all the BTC from your investment as well as commission on profits wouldn't even come close to covering it.

It seems to me the only important question is whether bitdice is still solvent.

I expect they publish a weekly list of investor balances, and publish their cold wallet address, so it shouldn't be too hard to check.

If they don't do this, investors should demand that they do. Nobody wants to invest in an insolvent dice site.
hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
March 25, 2015, 01:05:34 PM
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 01:05:18 PM
After that, the dealer was standing on both. That made it too hard to win. Did Alex fix that too?

It easier to win when dealer stand on soft 17

My bad. Let's leave it how it is then. Smiley It seems the only problem is the text on the table felt...
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 12:56:17 PM
and it outputs this:

Code:
bet_hash: 49dde939d58d494f4dbb3a510b86abe4f62d2c17a6a83bb3f5f9991a47cdac77b38008f8caf6938c6e491e6fd54ab020b1b961c787fd296cad4b2cae4ce540f6
["7C", "4D", "2S", "10S", "9C", ...]

Note that the 'bet hash' is the same as I see when I click the bet ID:



What am I doing wrong now? Maybe the Ruby code in the FAQ could be improved so that it will actually run and give the same shuffle as the game is using.

I will check the soft 17 bug, with validation here's the correct code:

Code:
require 'digest'

SECRET='7fc84a2d8dbf0d50b79bd771677354dd85b1b64129f6f54f7fb4def6973aba2598044eaa826a6020d41be7ec255e88b43c1b0afc2522c657aa6922b7852414d6'
USER_SEED='everymagicseed'
USER_ID='8798'
USER_BET_NUMBER='73'

deck = %w[AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC AS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8S 9S 10S JS QS KS AH 2H 3H 4H 5H 6H 7H 8H 9H 10H JH QH KH AD 2D 3D 4D 5D 6D 7D 8D 9D 10D JD QD KD AC 2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C 8C 9C 10C JC QC KC]

bet_hash = Digest::SHA512.hexdigest (SECRET + ':' + USER_SEED + ':' + USER_ID + ':' + USER_BET_NUMBER)
random = Random.new(bet_hash.to_i(16))
deck.shuffle!(random: random)

p deck

What output do you see when you run that? I see the same shuffled deck as from my version of the code, and it doesn't correspond to the cards I saw. Here's the text version of the image I posted showing the actual cards that were dealt:

Code:
Bet Amount	2.0 CLAM
Profit -2.000000 CLAM
Dealer Hand 3S,3D,AS (17)
Player Hand LOST: 9C,2S,4H (15)
Bet Number 73
User Seed everymagicseed
Bet Hash 49dde939d58d494f4dbb3a510b86abe4f62d2c17a6a83bb3f5f9991a47cdac77b38008f8caf6938c6e491e6fd54ab020b1b961c787fd296cad4b2cae4ce540f6

How does it get 3S,3D,AS from that shuffle?

Code:
$ ruby bitdice2.rb
["7C", "4D", "2S", "10S", "9C", "8H", "AC", "5H", "3H", "6S", "9S", "8D", "5C", "7C", "3H", "9H", "QH", "2S", "8S", "9H", "KH", "4S", "9S", "8C", "KS", "5S", "7C", "4S", "QS", "QC", "10H", "JH", "JH", "KS", "7D", "7D", "6C", "QH", "4S", "4D", "7H", "KS", "AS", "3C", "2S", "AS", "QH", "8H", "7S", "3C", "5D", "2D", "5D", "JD", "QS", "JD", "QS", "9D", "9D", "2D", "JH", "2C", "9C", "2D", "7H", "6C", "8C", "7C", "8S", "JD", "7S", "9H", "3S", "8S", "7S", "4H", "7D", "8D", "6S", "KH", "AC", "QD", "KH", "QC", "3D", "3S", "8H", "3D", "3H", "4C", "QS", "QS", "6D", "9H", "8S", "JD", "AC", "3D", "JH", "4S", "5D", "2D", "AH", "7S", "3D", "6S", "5S", "5C", "QD", "8C", "5C", "KC", "6C", "4H", "AD", "KS", "5C", "7C", "5D", "7H", "AD", "JD", "2D", "4S", "6H", "3H", "2C", "6S", "QD", "6D", "QS", "AD", "5S", "3H", "AD", "6H", "9H", "8S", "3C", "2H", "2H", "6C", "5D", "7S", "2H", "QC", "4D", "9S", "6H", "7H", "JS", "6S", "8H", "KD", "6C", "6D", "7D", "10C", "10S", "QD", "9D", "2D", "QD", "2C", "4D", "10H", "9D", "3C", "AC", "KC", "KC", "8C", "JS", "QS", "6D", "9H", "JC", "3C", "KD", "7S", "JS", "10C", "8S", "5H", "6C", "6H", "5H", "2H", "2S", "4C", "9D", "2H", "3D", "JC", "JH", "AS", "AS", "9D", "5H", "KS", "KH", "3H", "AD", "8H", "8H", "3C", "10C", "5S", "10C", "3S", "6H", "5D", "AD", "5H", "9C", "4H", "KH", "4H", "10D", "2D", "JH", "3S", "10H", "7H", "10D", "AC", "JH", "6D", "QC", "6H", "10S", "4S", "4C", "AH", "10C", "4D", "10S", "JC", "10D", "5C", "8C", "KD", "AH", "KD", "4H", "10D", "KC", "AH", "KD", "8D", "7H", "8H", "10H", "AH", "6H", "QH", "4D", "9S", "5H", "10D", "9C", "8S", "2S", "3D", "10H", "JC", "8D", "QC", "7D", "JS", "JD", "7D", "JS", "7C", "4C", "6H", "9H", "4C", "8H", "KS", "8D", "QC", "2S", "4S", "10H", "8D", "QC", "4H", "JS", "8C", "10C", "5S", "AC", "6D", "9C", "10H", "3C", "9D", "5C", "2C", "6S", "5H", "JC", "AH", "9S", "KC", "AS", "9S", "5H", "5S", "AD", "10D", "6D", "AS", "KD", "5S", "6S", "3D", "4C", "AH", "8C", "5S", "AS", "10D", "9D", "10H", "JH", "4H", "7H", "7H", "JD", "5C", "JS", "6C", "AS", "QS", "10D", "9C", "KC", "5D", "9H", "2H", "4C", "QD", "AC", "2C", "9S", "7D", "2C", "2C", "9C", "2H", "2C", "5D", "QH", "JS", "3H", "3H", "9C", "KD", "10S", "AH", "4S", "KH", "QH", "QH", "10S", "QD", "10S", "KH", "KD", "6C", "KS", "JC", "4C", "4D", "4D", "2S", "2S", "4H", "QH", "3C", "7S", "3S", "3S", "KC", "JD", "6D", "KS", "JC", "QC", "8C", "2D", "7C", "3S", "5C", "KH", "QD", "7S", "AC", "7C", "8S", "10S", "AD", "8D", "7D", "2H", "8D", "3S", "10C", "6S", "KC", "JC", "9S", "10C", "3D"]
legendary
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1014
Bitdice is scam scam scammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
March 25, 2015, 12:53:06 PM
I already notified Alex of the soft 17 issue. He said that he has changed it.

Are you thinking of the hard 17 issue?

The dealer is meant to hit soft 17 and stand on hard 17.

Initially the dealer was hitting both. That made it too easy to win. Alex fixed that.

After that, the dealer was standing on both. That made it too hard to win. Did Alex fix that too?

It easier to win when dealer stand on soft 17 and it is guaranteed win when when dealer hits on 17
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
March 25, 2015, 12:50:32 PM
I already notified Alex of the soft 17 issue. He said that he has changed it.

Are you thinking of the hard 17 issue?

The dealer is meant to hit soft 17 and stand on hard 17.

Initially the dealer was hitting both. That made it too easy to win. Alex fixed that.

After that, the dealer was standing on both. That made it too hard to win. Did Alex fix that too?
hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
March 25, 2015, 09:23:09 AM
How does BitDice generate enough income to cover this? It looks like even all the BTC from your investment as well as commission on profits wouldn't even come close to covering it.

Stat's have been reset with the release of V3, I'm considering to merge them as it subject to question. But our profits was at 950BTC, and at some time I owned about 70% of the bankroll and that's only Bitcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
I lost the liqour money boys...
March 25, 2015, 09:18:17 AM
How does BitDice generate enough income to cover this? It looks like even all the BTC from your investment as well as commission on profits wouldn't even come close to covering it.
hero member
Activity: 776
Merit: 522
March 25, 2015, 09:13:50 AM
Hello, I just want to know if you at Bitdice have any plans regarding adding faucet to your site? Every big dice site has one already... It would be  nice feature. Also I want to know what is "keyboard betting"?

I'm not sure about faucet, we have a RainBot which funds active players, and at least once a week it rains like 1M redd or 200k doge at once.. However to receive those you need to play in the last 24 hours.

Keyboards betting means you can play with shortcuts, pressing H or L on the keyboards.
Pages:
Jump to: