Topic: BitHashMiner 10TH/s Bitcoin Miner - page 6. (Read 17536 times)

People know that who are doing baseless argument and protecting some persons, and who showing authentic proofs.

Nope, you are going offtopic:
what does baseless accusations of someone getting payed and bribed have to do with your hardware?
what does people asking about you hardware have to do with your hardware?

I'm pretty sure everyone here is requesting proof, and you're giving only baseless argument. You're sorta doing it backward.

AJRGale is going off topic and i think he want to defense TheRealSteve and Taras, I am giving proof and you are giving only pretenses.

Seriously though. This is a hilarious thread. BitHashMiner, a bit of advice - prove you have hardware. Anything at all - just post a photo of the actual case, or an actual prototype hash board, or a box of ASICs you got from the factory. SOMETHING that exists in the real world. Trying to argue your way onto some "preferred manufacturer" list will never work until someone sees evidence that you are a manufacturer at all.

So yeah, put up some genuine information about the machine you claim to be building, and most all of this perceived persecution will disappear. If the stuff exists like you say it does, it'll take maybe ten minutes to solve this problem the easy way.

BitHashMiner are you shitting me? conspiracy is NOT proof!

if you want to pull PROOF up, PROOF on your HARDWARE NOW!

Another person sidehack claiming that TheRealSteve accepts bribe.

TheRealSteve and Taras is giving False pretenses and I'm giving Evidences.

Additionally, I'm not sure if this guy is advertising a vaporware miner or the bitcoin wiki. Did he just link the mining hardware comparison page EIGHT times in one paragraph? Maybe TheRealSteve is paying BitHashMiner to raise hitcounts on the wiki and this whole thing is actually a conspiracy within a conspiracy?

Sarcasm is lost on you as much as logical reasoning
If my statement wasn't sarcasm, it would imply that you really did pay him, which really only serves to make you look even more shady.
Boom, you've been logic'ed.

Want to see somebody (happens to be the one I'm filtering through at the moment) do it right, while still being under the air of "we haven't a clue how legit this outfit is"?
ASICrising
Main website with details, tons of high quality media: https://asicrising.de/
Investment prospectus: https://coinbau.com/files/cb_investment_brochure_web_en.pdf
BCT thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/019-jgh-coinbau-looks-for-investors-in-german-mining-technology-719143

Even if they end up scammy (and I'm far from saying they are), they're a far cry from what you're trying to peddle.
But you go right ahead and keep trying to make this about me, instead of your (lack of) hardware - you do you, man

And I'll do me - which is to say, finally moving on to Achilles Labs, hooray!

TheRealSteve is saying that Taras accepts bribe, You can check above TheRealSteve quote.

tl;dr: "I still can't verify my own claims therefore I continue my ad hominem attacks and demand that TheRealSteve works faster to satisfy my personal issues, or in lieu of that pathetically attempt to suggest that he is awaiting a bribe."

Check my earlier screenshots - HashCoins is further down the list than EMIC which I only tackled the other day, and in between I've had other things to do, and I certainly have better things to do than refute several of your allegations a fourth time.  Don't forget to add 'MORE PROOF' by crudely circling Achilles Labs

Another great proof that Taras and TheRealSteve got big money from another Miner company which name is Uranus v1 Miner , I going to proof it, Every Person know who reading these posts that recently TheRealSteve and Taras decided to introduce new polices for https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison  , They have introduce new policy that which product is not shipped anywhere they can't be listed on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison , Taras and TheRealSteve think suddenly changed when they saw that BITHASHMINER listed on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison I think so far they are waiting for a payment offer from me when they saw that i'm not offering them any money then they had decided to remove me from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison , but after this bad behavior of these person then I had complaint them that why Emic PowerModule still showing on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison then they had take action because if they don't  take action on Emic PowerModule then it will going to against Taras and TheRealSteve, in finale they had defense self by removing Emic PowerModule, Please note this point that Taras and TheRealSteve removed Emic PowerModule from list when their pre-order duration time ended, Now i'm going to disclosure another big proof that Taras and TheRealSteve got huge money from Uranus v1 Miner, HashCoins Uranus AVAILABLE For Pre-Order but why HashCoins Uranus showing on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison while Taras and TheRealSteve changed their policy that mentioned above, While Shipping date showing on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison  January 2015, it's mean HashCoins Uranus failed to ship on company given time which is January 2015, I'm not saying to Taras and TheRealSteve to remove Emic PowerModule, Uranus v1 Miner and BitHashMiner, But Problem is that Taras and TheRealSteve bad policy only for BitHashMiner, I don't want to remove any units from https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison Because it's every miners rights to display on Mining_hardware_comparison  , Thank you all for your time,

https://i.imgur.com/zopdr8L.png

https://i.imgur.com/6FKkVoJ.png

Blahahaha!!! Seriously made my day with this!!!

Or perhaps even...INfamous!

And for the conspiracy theory ones out there: No, still haven't gotten around to AL.  I spent the better part of the last 2 hours trying to dig through various KnC threads (to no avail, even after being pointed in a decent direction just in case I missed it) for concise information about their 20nm chip.  If it is a 20nm chip.  That's in their Neptunes.  Or is it.  For which (so far) exist no clear chip shots.  Or do they.  Or even specs on the chip, rather than the miner.  Which may or may not be the same thing, depending on whether they're referring to 5 of the hashing units or just 1.  I R CONFUS. *moves on to EMIC, finally, as that probably induces lesser headaches*

Steve, there's a conspiracy theory about us! We're famous!

I don't mind butterfly labs crew coming here with their new scam, just like the bfl thread. They are entertaining to me :-)

Seriously, go away and find a job instead of wasting our time with this nonsense. The only thing you're doing here is entertaining us with how bad your scam is.

Again BitHashMiner or whatever your name is.  Give me proof.  Proof you have a miner that I should buy.  Sell me?
If you have what you advertise, I want one.

Yeah, between the conspiracy theory approach and the broken translations, I had to re-read that particular post a few times as well.  

I guess what he was trying to say was:
1. Taras only removed the EMIC listing because OP said something.
2. It was only removed because OP's listing was removed.
3. Because it wasn't removed before... I don't know what, exactly.  I'm sure there was a point he was trying to make.

Point 1 is entirely at odds with the earlier claim that we'd never remove them because payola or something.

Point 2 is a non sequitur; Taras already mentioned that he decided to remove it due to not having shipped hardware (and I already mentioned I'd be looking at Achilles Labs when I work my way down to that).  That may be a soft policy change - perhaps listings were allowed to exist for pre-order unproven hardware before, giving companies the benefit of the doubt.  That policy change, insofar as it being one, would affect every listing equally.

Point 3 was more-or-less already answered.  It's not Taras's day job to keep an eye on that page and police it, nor is it mine - plus I haven't been on the wiki for much longer than this whole ordeal.  The wiki is public and relies, in part, on the public's participation.  Sometimes that means a scam entry gets removed right quick, and other times it means an entry lingers longer because whoever's viewing it hasn't seen anything untoward about it.  In fact, the EMIC entry was the last modification to that page before OP added his entry, and apparently OP did not see fit to remove it either.  Why not?   Probably because OP really couldn't care less or perhaps didn't even look at it - and that's probably true for most visitors.

That said, there is something to Point 1: it highlighted the need for the community to be more vigilant of the wiki as well.  I'll peek in from time to time, but it really would be nice to have more (reputable) users there.  But that's a discussion for the Meta section

Now, as much as I enjoy the back-and-forth about wiki editing, I agree with the last few posts that are about the hardware and invite BitHashMiner to
A. prove themselves to the community now, or
B. let the thread lay dormant until the chips from the Chinese manufacturer have arrived and then post some shots of those chips and board designs they're supposed to go onto, or
C. let it wither away further into April when the 2,000u/month claims should be rather easy to solidify.
Then you can say "I told you we were legitimate, aren't you sad you didn't buy when you had the chance?" and make all of us eat crow