bitmain and asicboost/segwit | Bitcointalksearch.org

iamnotback

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 265

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 11:13:54 AM

just done some quick maths

hmm
looks like BTCC and F2pool are the ones making more blocks than their hash %
not the other way round

Nonsense.

The hashrate measured would include the performance boost of the hashrate via AsicBoost.

There is no way to measure whether covert AsicBoost is being used or not. It is indeed 100% covert.

vapourminer

legendary

Activity: 4354

Merit: 3614

what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?

thanks for the explanations, i wasnt sure how asicboost was/is/could be implemented, and if it would suddenly doorstop a bunch of hardware. sounds like bitmain stuff will work either way, just with a 20% boost with proper firmware.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: cpfreeplz on April 06, 2017, 05:38:54 PM

Holy crap I never even thought of it but ya. That's a huge reason for them never to support segwit!! Is this true though? How would you know if asics would be useless with segwit?

Are you even listening? Current miners will hash exactly the same way they always have. If bitmain are doing something secretive with their special sauce then segwit will block it and make them only usable in the same way the rest of the public is using them.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

quoting vays..(facepalm)
the guy that announced he doesnt program and doesnt even hold much bitcoin
try someone better next time

asics have been around longer than segwit, even longer than Luke JR announcing to use the anyonecanspend opcode exploit to go soft...

if segwit runs into a hurdle in feb 2017 you cant blame hardware made in 2015.. the UN-ACTIVATED segwit software thats just been created obviously didnt take hardware efficiencies into account..

(unless asic manufacturers had a time machine to go back to make an exploit before segwit was coded purely to screw with segwit 2 years later)

the truth is that gmaxwell only found a segwit issue last month.. and realised segwit cant function if efficient asics are running. but...
instead of admitting segwit had an issue and the only remedy is a user node consensus update(HF) to not need 2 merkles.. instead he wants to call asics the exploit..(facepalm)

makes me laugh

come on laugh with me
how can a hardware manufacturer make an intentional exploit attack in 2015 for software only released late 2016.

much simpler answer is gmaxwell only found a segwit flaw last month and is now pointing fingers

Viscount

sr. member

Activity: 243

Merit: 250

cpfreeplz

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1042

Holy crap I never even thought of it but ya. That's a huge reason for them never to support segwit!! Is this true though? How would you know if asics would be useless with segwit?

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Quote from: achow101 on April 06, 2017, 04:52:17 PM

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 06, 2017, 04:24:43 PM

They're not even using it guys...drama's over. back to talking
about how we can increase the capacity of Bitcoin.

---

Quote

Bitmain holds the ASICBOOST patent in China. We can legally use it in our own mining farms in China to profit from it and sell the cloud mining contracts to the public. This, however profitable, is not something we would do for the greater good of Bitcoin.

Well they say they don't use it, but then why would they implement asicboost in their production hardware and have firmware available to use it if they weren't going to use it?

Dunno. Maybe did it as a project when they got the patent or as defensive measure if others started using

freebutcaged

hero member

Activity: 588

Merit: 541

So they were smarter and figured a way to mine better than others? they proved that they did the work or POW isn't proving of work?

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

Quote from: achow101 on April 06, 2017, 04:52:17 PM

Well they say they don't use it, but then why would they implement asicboost in their production hardware and have firmware available to use it if they weren't going to use it?

who gives a crap if they use it or not.

the hardware existed before segwit.

much like ATI and Geforce existed before bitcoin
if bitcoin2010-2013 suddenly had an update that caused issues with ATI cards.. where GPU mining was only possible on inefficient Geforce cards, blame the software update. not ATI

people would have laughed if someone made a software update to bitcoin and set the bitcoin software to become active later on but then realised before even being active the software wont work with ATI... but still devs pretend ATI is exploiting/attacking bitcoin.

there would be no logic in that madness

achow101

staff

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6793

Just writing some code

Quote from: jonald_fyookball on April 06, 2017, 04:24:43 PM

They're not even using it guys...drama's over. back to talking
about how we can increase the capacity of Bitcoin.

---

Quote

Bitmain holds the ASICBOOST patent in China. We can legally use it in our own mining farms in China to profit from it and sell the cloud mining contracts to the public. This, however profitable, is not something we would do for the greater good of Bitcoin.

Well they say they don't use it, but then why would they implement asicboost in their production hardware and have firmware available to use it if they weren't going to use it?

jonald_fyookball

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1008

Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

They're not even using it guys...drama's over. back to talking
about how we can increase the capacity of Bitcoin.

---

Quote

Bitmain holds the ASICBOOST patent in China. We can legally use it in our own mining farms in China to profit from it and sell the cloud mining contracts to the public. This, however profitable, is not something we would do for the greater good of Bitcoin.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

Quote from: Blockonomics.co on April 06, 2017, 11:52:01 AM

By that I mean BITMAIN and associates. This includes the likes of ViaBTC, and other mostly Chinese organizations/individuals.

you might want to reach further over to the blockstreams associates side. EG F2pool and BTCC

oh that reminds me. even f2pool was good enough to have morals to admit something

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 01:53:41 AM

meanwhile bitcoins segwit 31% block flagging is only temporary due to a hack expect it to drop back down below 30% in the next fortnight

https://twitter.com/f2pool_wangchun/status/848582740798611456

Quote

Wang Chun‏ @f2pool_wangchun

Someone hacked major mining operations and their stratum had been changed from antpool, viabtc, btctop to us. Our hashrate doubled instantly

10:07 am - 2 Apr 2017

Blockonomics.co

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 11:25:55 AM

Quote from: Blockonomics.co on April 06, 2017, 11:22:08 AM

BITMAIN Equipment won't stop hashing. They have ASICBOOST built into its hardware, but only the units that BITMAIN is operating have the corresponding software for ASICBOOST to work.

This means that all of BITMAIN's farms/mines will lose the 30% advantage. However, they still own massive amounts of hashpower.
Consumer units shouldn't be affected.

only bitmain has the software? pfft
if you keep pulling your own leg like that... only you will be the one walking with a limp

By that I mean BITMAIN and associates. This includes the likes of ViaBTC, and other mostly Chinese organizations/individuals.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

Quote from: achow101 on April 06, 2017, 11:44:20 AM

apparently being used

prove it
i do laugh at you and gmaxwell waffle about X but then throw in the "apparently" "could be" "potentially"

anyway

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 11:28:33 AM

lets see what the maths really tells us

Quote from: franky1 on April 06, 2017, 11:13:54 AM

just done some quick maths

* stats at time of post

hmm
looks like BTCC and F2pool are the ones making more blocks than their hash %
not the other way round

*for those wishing to question the numbers

i would have expected antpool to have a block % of something in the 40's while having hash in the 30's if all this gmaxwell PoW propaganda was real
definitely not less than their hash%

oh well gmaxwell debunked.

kind of funny how many times gmaxwells announcement didnt name the pool and how many times gmaxwell uses the word "they could" rather then "they are"

Quote

A month ago I was explaining the attack on Bitcoin's SHA2 hashcash which
is exploited by ASICBOOST and the various steps which could be used to
block it in the network if it became a problem.

While most discussion of ASICBOOST has focused on the overt method
of implementing it, there also exists a covert method for using it.

Quote

An incompatibility would go a long way to explain some of the
more inexplicable behavior from some parties in the mining
ecosystem so I began looking for supporting evidence.

Reverse engineering of a particular mining chip has demonstrated
conclusively that ASICBOOST has been implemented
in hardware.

Quote

Due to a design oversight the Bitcoin proof of work function has a potential
attack which can allow an attacking miner to save up-to 30% of their energy
costs (though closer to 20% is more likely due to implementation overheads).

..
just to let the script writers twist it into "its an attack, bomb them bomb them bomb them"

P.S
gotta laugh that when its an exploit.. he words it as attack on Bitcoin's SHA2 [adambacks] hashcash.
but when its a bug he calls it an bitcoin proof of work oversight....

he is too far deep inside his bosses pocket

achow101

staff

Activity: 3458

Merit: 6793

Just writing some code

Quote from: vapourminer on April 06, 2017, 09:02:30 AM

this is probably obvious but i havent seen a clear yes/no answer on this:

if segwit activates on btc (fat chance) will bitmains recent asics stop hashing? if so which models?

No, they won't stop hashing. Most miners will not be using asicboost right now because it requires software that does the preprocessing for asicboost to be used with the miners and a different firmware on the miners themselves to be able to use asicboost. Furthermore, the stratum protocol is incompatible with ASICBOOST (at least the covert version, which is what is apparently being used) so people who are using antminers are not using asicboost right now, and making asicboost impossible to use would not effect them.

Disabling ASICBOOST by a protocol change would make the miners operated by Bitmain and those who received the special software and firmware from Bitmain would only make asicboost unusable and thus take away their advantage. It is unknown who is actually using asicboost besides the miners operated by Bitmain.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

Quote from: Blockonomics.co on April 06, 2017, 11:22:08 AM

BITMAIN Equipment won't stop hashing. They have ASICBOOST built into its hardware, but only the units that BITMAIN is operating have the corresponding software for ASICBOOST to work.

This means that all of BITMAIN's farms/mines will lose the 30% advantage. However, they still own massive amounts of hashpower.
Consumer units shouldn't be affected.

only bitmain has the software? pfft
if you keep pulling your own leg like that... only you will be the one walking with a limp

Blockonomics.co

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

BITMAIN Equipment won't stop hashing. They have ASICBOOST built into its hardware, but only the units that BITMAIN is operating have the corresponding software for ASICBOOST to work.

This means that all of BITMAIN's farms/mines will lose the 30% advantage. However, they still own massive amounts of hashpower.
Consumer units shouldn't be affected.

ebliever

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1036

Quote from: vapourminer on April 06, 2017, 09:02:30 AM

this is probably obvious but i havent seen a clear yes/no answer on this:

if segwit activates on btc (fat chance) will bitmains recent asics stop hashing? if so which models?

My understanding is the ASICs from Bitmain will still work, they just lose their advantage.

My understanding is also that most miners using Bitmain hardware did not know about ASICBoost or have it enabled on their setups, that it was kept secret for the personal benefit of Jihan Wu and his close associates (I'm assuming Ver was on the inside circle). But I'd appreciate correction/corroboration on this point.

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

just done some quick maths

* stats at time of post

hmm
looks like BTCC and F2pool are the ones making more blocks than their hash %
not the other way round

*for those wishing to question the numbers

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4410

Merit: 4788

Yawn

2013 - GPU miner- "some dude is using asics, thats unfair lets bomb them bomb them bomb them"
2014 - GPU miner- "decided to buy an asic, way cheaper than a bomb, happy now"

result
join the party of many pools of a decentralised PEER network using asics by bitmain..not throw a tantrum and refuse to give up your corner of your blockstream TIER network.

PS its not just antpool using bitmain products

Topic: bitmain and asicboost/segwit (Read 1317 times)