Satoshi intended the hard-fork to deal with unsolvable issues like this. The longest chain becomes bitcoin, the shorter becomes an altcoin. If this issue does not resolve some other way, that's what should happen.
Interesting approach for the medium and long term.
Bitmain gets to support client they want. Miners (me) get to support the client we want by mining the pool that indicates it.
I doubt Bitmain's owners are intentionally trying to go bankrupt.
Valid point. They are expressing their right to say how they feel: "BU". I still think they are a great company! I just do not want to see a fork. It would simply be
full of problems.
Ultimately I think this issue will be solved by a few engineers deciding how to move forward.
Right now. It is only signaling. "Sources" say that they are moving the public 51% threat to a more realistic signaling of 75% for BU over a sustained period. Once a change was decided, there would be two weeks before the change actually took place.
I think BU is the better solution for scaling (which I think BTC should do) and keeping transactions on chain. We just don't need to see a fork.
Support another coin with GPU mining....you'll be glad you did....& so will your wallet
Mine's gettin full !!!
I am considering ETH (not ETC, speaking of forks).