An open letter:
Dear Dev and Community.
I must admit I'm very impressed with what you are trying to create here. So impressed that I have been throwing ~ 55mh/s at the coin for over 3 days. I missed the launch but got in at the end of the 16 diff round and have stuck around. However as a somewhat experienced miner there may be a few reality checks that need to be discussed.
1. The hashrate is tanking. Why? Because nobody knows about the coin. Why? Because you all are too busy being idealistic rather than pragmatic. Yes, I'm a miner and probably talking through my wallet. But I've got to pay the bills like everyone else. The coin needs to have a value sooner rather than later to attract interest. Which leads me to point 2.
...
3. Supply and demand. I have no problems with the supply. It's issue rate is just about perfect. Demand however is a problem. Why would anyone want to own BTM? It has no real world usage. The fact is that the only crypto with real world usage is BTC. I can buy everything from a house to a hooker with BTC. There are various coins that have tried to enable real world usage of their coin. NLG springs to mind. I can buy a Subway sandwich with NLG. Shame I live 10,000 miles away from The Netherlands and their 2 Subway shops.... The coin either needs to become a trusted source of value like LTC (which has no real world usage) or a coin that can be used in real life. I'm guessing that being the next LTC is a worthy goal but is it achievable?
I'm putting my flame proof suit on now.. Although I'm hoping that people read through the above post twice before lashing out. I'm not a troll, just the opposite, I'm one of the top miners of this coin and I want it to succeed. I'm ben96c on the pool if you don't believe me.
Thank you, and I agree with all that you say
Some points which are not clarified in my previous post are as follows
1. Hashrate has dropped as hired mining rigs from those who wanted to invest at launch have tailed off.
2. We do not want to be the next LTC. We have already created, compiled, tested, and successfully released a new scrypt codebase which effectively replaces litecoin's both for our own project and for new scrypt clones (pfennig). Additionally we have configured the block chain to be more suitable to the crypto currency era we are in now. To me the 'next ltc' milestone was passed when we launched, the technical foundation is there. From now we focus on demand and easing adoption, that is our only focus.
I am glad you feel supply has been balanced fairly, that bodes well for us and gives some merit to the rationale of pre-launch decisions documented on the wiki.
As for demand, and focussing on adoption, I hope we can turn the thread back in that direction, as I said in my previous post there are plenty of interesting things to be discussing.
Hopefully no flame suit is required here
I do not wish to flame LTC as I admire many in their community, but technically Bitmark is what you would get if Litecoin was created today rather than years ago. I am sure any non-bias programmer would confirm this as a fact. That is technically only, Bitmark's focus after launch, and budding community (hopefully), are quite different.Status: We are looking for people to join the
IPM Pool Test over the next 3 days.