Of course the criminal "seller" isn't; they shipped an empty box, and you said only taking video of its opening would result in the "seller" losing the dispute, then attempted to revise history by saying that's not the only proof you needed. You are effectively being a criminal yourself by denying the victim his refund, despite the only evidence against the "seller" that you originally said needed to be shown.
Even if your revisionist history wasn't, the "seller" used USPS flat rate, to 1) hide proof of empty box weight 2) use USPIS's de facto refusal to take/investigate/document whatsoever mail fraud cases (from personal experience) to get away with it. Even if victims could bribe USPIS to actually do their bloody jobs, would you just come up with another ex post facto requirement of proof, like fingerprints, DNA sample, fMRI, polygraph, notarized accounting of all bank statements for the past 10 years...
"Cannot determine" my ass, more like "we at bitmit are forever moving the goalpost into unobtainia in order to keep your coins".
Even if your revisionist history wasn't, the "seller" used USPS flat rate, to 1) hide proof of empty box weight 2) use USPIS's de facto refusal to take/investigate/document whatsoever mail fraud cases (from personal experience) to get away with it. Even if victims could bribe USPIS to actually do their bloody jobs, would you just come up with another ex post facto requirement of proof, like fingerprints, DNA sample, fMRI, polygraph, notarized accounting of all bank statements for the past 10 years...
"Cannot determine" my ass, more like "we at bitmit are forever moving the goalpost into unobtainia in order to keep your coins".
Why do you have such negative rep here? O_o
