This makes me wonder if any other users of Bitvest are having withdrawal issues that might be related to lightlord's alleged illness-
The problems with the retreats go back a long way and have nothing to do with Lightlord's alleged illness (when I say alleged, it's not that I believe it or not, it's that I have no way of verifying it).
This is something that is commented on a lot in the bitvest thread. In the end people end up getting paid, but we are in the same situation as with the signature campaigns, people request a withdrawal and it can take weeks to get the money:
These are all comments from the last page in the official bitvest.io thread:
...what's important on this thread is the hot wallet of bitvest and that should be the main concern ....
I am also looking for what actually happened to the hotwallet issue but no one seems talking about it...
(This is actually a laugh because there has been a lot of talk about it in the thread, the only thing that has been covered up by people talking about the signature campaign in that thread.)
even a loyal customer will get frustrated if they are waiting for weeks to get their withdrawal to be processed.
The main problem of the hot wallet is basically similar to the campaign issue. When the hot wallet is empty, lightlord seems to be very slow in refilling it so players have to wait for weeks before withdrawal is processed.
But hot wallet and the campaign payments can't be considered as same priority thing, I agree that everyone who is working with their campaign should get paid on time but it has very simple solution just let the campaign manager himself to proceed the payments weekly but handling the hot wallet can be tricky if he is busy amd still don't want to trust anyone.
In my opinion, hot wallet should be the first priority as it is related to their players who are their customers. They may lose their players based if the hot wallet issue is happening really often. As I said in other thread, lightlord should use an escrow for the campaign and trust the escrow to do everything related to the campaign so he can have more time to handle the casino.
If so, there's no way a gaming site should depend on a single person, but I didn't think Bitvest was run that way (not that I gave it much thought, not having used the site myself).
I would bet that that is how it is run