Pages:
Author

Topic: Black holes do NOT exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong ... - page 3. (Read 5357 times)

legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000
Nice stealth bump Arien, this topic is old.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 256
IMO Black holes do exist, they are the seeds for next big bang... and when people find out what the world is really about, what's the big question to answer, then the black holes will unite, the hole world will be whole, and next big bang to happen.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
whatever.


What will it changes my everyday life?

Or my life in any sense?

Stupid science and fundamental research. "What good is quantum mechanics?" said idiot to Schroedinger.

Enjoying your transistors?
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1009
whatever.


What will it changes my everyday life?

Or my life in any sense?
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
I love that, even the Daily Mail commenters think this is a load of bullshit LOL Cheesy You do realise that they spotted black holes with fucking telescopes and probes right? They didn't even need to do mathematics to prove they exist, I love religious people like BaDecker, the more science proves them wrong the more desperate they get.

The best part is the uneducated lay people arguing about topics they are most ignorant about. Do they not see a problem with this?

Here's a hint. Math is a model, an approximation to reality. Take a simple example, the inverse square law, 1/r^2. Works perfectly well for orbits, but set r to zero...

OH NOES!!! REALITY IS BROKEN!! The earth just lost all mass because I put a zero in the wrong spot!!

Enter a new model, dirac delta, reality works again...no jesus required.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
Well, let's wait the review from her peers. Smiley
Aww, you science types are such a buzz-kill. With you logic and double blind studies. Your ruining the magic.  Cheesy

ON the contrary, it fuels the real magic. For those who want a nice initiation on what the paper is really about (ie, the black hole paradoxes), this is a good lecture:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8bhtEgB8Mo&list=UUYeF244yNGuFefuFKqxIAXw

Particularly the second part with sean carrol.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1147
The revolution will be monetized!
Well, let's wait the review from her peers. Smiley
Aww, you science types are such a buzz-kill. With you logic and double blind studies. Your ruining the magic.  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
... claims scientist - and she has the maths to prove it.

From http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2769156/Black-holes-NOT-exist-Big-Bang-Theory-wrong-claims-scientist-maths-prove-it.html#ixzz3ELy9C2DR

  • Scientist claims she has mathematical proof black holes cannot exist
  • She said it is impossible for stars to collapse and form a singularity
  • Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton said she is still in 'shock' from the find
  • Previously, scientists thought stars much larger than the sun collapsed under their own gravity and formed black holes when they died
  • During this process they release a type of radiation called Hawking radiation
  • But new research claims the star would lose too much mass and wouldn't be able to form a black hole
  • If true, the theory that the universe began as a singularity, followed by the Big Bang, could also be wrong

Read more at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2769156/Black-holes-NOT-exist-Big-Bang-Theory-wrong-claims-scientist-maths-prove-it.html#ixzz3ELy9C2DR.

What do you think?

That serious scientists don't publish their research in the Daily Mail.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
So when a star dies, it doesnt end up being a black hole?
hero member
Activity: 635
Merit: 500
BlasterKVs the king of xbox modding
i think i should improve my math

so one day i can prove Sun is not hot   Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 250
et rich or die tryi
Cant wait for a peer review on this...
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
... claims scientist - and she......



stopped reading there... there is almost zero credibility in this "math"

After all, even Madam Curie was poisoned to death by the radiation she worked with.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
... claims scientist - and she......



stopped reading there... there is almost zero credibility in this "math"
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
See? That's the trouble with you kids. They spotted something with telescopes, and decided they were going to call them black holes. The fact is, they don't really know what they spotted.

ROFL. You really dont have a clue, do you? Here is what really happened: einsteins equations of special relativity predicted there would be black holes, even though that seemed insane at the time. It took years to figure that out and understand and decades more to actually find evidence that proved their existence. Thats how science works: you formulate a theory, then figure out ways to prove or disprove the theory. If you can not prove or disprove it, its not science. BTW by now the evidence is overwhelming, from lensing effects to the gravitational pull they exert on nearby stars and entire galaxies. No one sane doubt they exist.

BTW bis, you cant see a black hole with a telescope. Duh.


Einstein did his work with simple adding machinges and paper calc. He NEVER would have been able to figure out how to use a computer; barely could tie his shoes, if he happened to get them on the correct feet.

Einstein was an antagonist of quantum mechanics in many ways. He was good at what he did. We are moving onward and upward.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
the ccc theory is best one, and also it make sense

I actually agree. WHile the math is way over my head, something about it just feels right. Hope evidence for it is found.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 1022
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
the ccc theory is best one, and also it make sense
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
Stephen Hawkings has been doing a flip flop on this theory. At first they existed now they don't.  He said the same thing about God too.  Fascinating subject.

Hawkings never flip flopped on whether or not black holes exist. He made a bet back in the 70s against his own belief and his own theory, but that was in his words "an insurance policy". If it turned out black holes did indeed exist, he would pay some other scientist a yearly subscription to Penthouse magazine. And he did. If he was wrong about his theory, at least he would have received a penthouse subscription as consolation for years of wasted work. If anything, it was a joke.  He never changed his mind on whether or not black holes exist, he did change his mind (and conceded another bet) about whether or not black holes destroy information. While he conceded that bet, its far from certain he was actually incorrect on that one.
full member
Activity: 363
Merit: 100
SWISSREALCOIN - FIRST REAL ESTATE CRYPTO TOKEN
Just theory either way. Even if big bang is true, it has 0 effect on we conduct our life.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
See? That's the trouble with you kids. They spotted something with telescopes, and decided they were going to call them black holes. The fact is, they don't really know what they spotted.

ROFL. You really dont have a clue, do you? Here is what really happened: einsteins equations of special relativity predicted there would be black holes, even though that seemed insane at the time. It took years to figure that out and understand and decades more to actually find evidence that proved their existence. Thats how science works: you formulate a theory, then figure out ways to prove or disprove the theory. If you can not prove or disprove it, its not science. BTW by now the evidence is overwhelming, from lensing effects to the gravitational pull they exert on nearby stars and entire galaxies. No one sane doubt they exist.

BTW bis, you cant see a black hole with a telescope. Duh.
sr. member
Activity: 301
Merit: 250
I Hate the Tv Series The Big Bang Theory ,So Shameful
Pages:
Jump to: