i think black hole just a imagination 
Topic: #Black holes Matter - page 2. (Read 2079 times)
i think black hole just a imagination 
Interesting.. got part way through it and it sounds like reasonable science to me.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..
I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL
Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.
And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !
So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !
And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !
So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !
In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..
Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty
You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system
THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..
I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL
Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.
And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !
So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !
And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !
So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !
In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..
Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty
You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system
THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.
jokes going to be on them if they laughed at it. there is almost certainly a planet out there from what iv read about it anyway. IMO people are skeptical because people keep calling it planet X and people relate "planet x" to doomsday prophecy's. call it planet 9 or something lol.
True. Think of what it would be like if we lived on a flat earth in a black hole.
Ya i agree good point about the stigma with anything planet X related.
In case people did not know or look at the link i gave..
To sum it up there is some objects far out that move around the solar system.
That have been gravitational pulled together in tandem.
Which as scientists said there is little to speculate on what caused it.. other than a planet sized object.
Myself i have no alternative theory to explain this odd sighting.
Something is out there and it has to have the mass of a planet.
And something the size of Neptune is pretty damn big too !
Check this picture out for a comparison.
And sorry i am not trying to go off-topic on you OP.
You posted some interesting news i forgot to finish reading..
I was trying to highlight the methodology earlier.
In case people did not know or look at the link i gave..
To sum it up there is some objects far out that move around the solar system.
That have been gravitational pulled together in tandem.
Which as scientists said there is little to speculate on what caused it.. other than a planet sized object.
Myself i have no alternative theory to explain this odd sighting.
Something is out there and it has to have the mass of a planet.
And something the size of Neptune is pretty damn big too !
Check this picture out for a comparison.
And sorry i am not trying to go off-topic on you OP.
You posted some interesting news i forgot to finish reading..
I was trying to highlight the methodology earlier.
Interesting.. got part way through it and it sounds like reasonable science to me.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..
I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL
Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.
And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !
So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !
And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !
So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !
In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..
Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty
You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system
THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..
I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL
Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.
And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !
So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !
And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !
So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !
In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..
Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty
You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system
THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.
jokes going to be on them if they laughed at it. there is almost certainly a planet out there from what iv read about it anyway. IMO people are skeptical because people keep calling it planet X and people relate "planet x" to doomsday prophecy's. call it planet 9 or something lol.
Interesting.. got part way through it and it sounds like reasonable science to me.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..
I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL
Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.
And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !
So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !
And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !
So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !
In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..
Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty
You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system
THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..
I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL
Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.
And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !
So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !
And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !
So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !
In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..
Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty
You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.
EDIT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system
THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.
Another one of those weird theories that can never be proved.
Well, if Satoshi would come back and put his huge fortune to good use, we might get some answers.
Yes, but if he did, even Bitcoin would become a black hole.
Too true, is there a bright side?
Another one of those weird theories that can never be proved.
Well, if Satoshi would come back and put his huge fortune to good use, we might get some answers.
Yes, but if he did, even Bitcoin would become a black hole.
Another one of those weird theories that can never be proved.
Well, if Satoshi would come back and put his huge fortune to good use, we might get some answers.
Another one of those weird theories that can never be proved.
Most of the universe may be trapped inside of ancient black holes
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-universe-may-trapped-inside-153458751.html
#Black holes Matter
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-universe-may-trapped-inside-153458751.html
#Black holes Matter
Jump to: