It always depends on the wagering requirements though. Blackjack.fun increased wagering requirements to justify their non-expiry bonuses. I think it doesn’t matter about the time limit since user will need to fulfill the wagering requirements no matter what happened with or without duration. I don’t see anything that will make the casino at loss here since they have special computation to count wager.
The only reason why some casino add duration on the bonuses is because they offer low wager requirements and also they want user to wager the volume for short period of time but it’s still the same when there’s no duration because the wager volume matter the most for the casino profit.
Yes I see what you mean and from what you said I have the assumption that blackjack.fun provides time limit wagering requirements indeed so that its customers can continue betting consistently even with low stakes or volumes and have no objection to completing the bonus requirements.
And from that blackjack.fun is able to have loyal customers and benefit in the long term because its customers always bet there all the time.
For blackjack this is not detrimental for them because it can be their strategy to be able to have a lot of loyal customers or new customers who always use their casino.
I agree that having people constantly bet, even if in low amounts, equals to constantly having customers IF the customer doesn't leave.
If I ever owned a casino I would rather have customers that gamble small amounts per customer but have a lot of customers, that would be a consistent way of making a profit, compared to having some rich whales who would make a million and then lose a million, not all casinos have hundreds of millions of dollars, so it would really ruin the bankroll of a casino to have those type of people. In the end, they are doing the right thing for themselves and only thing we could do is support their decision on this manner.
Most casinos I know of start really small, expect for the few that casinos that their owners were already billionaires before deciding to set up a casino.
By starting small, I mean that they started with pleb gamblers who gamble in very little amount of money and also made their winnings in small amount as well, There are even some casinos that set a limit to the amount of money a gambler can win, regardless of how much the gambler wager, this is nothing other than to prevent gamblers from winning an amount of money that the casino might not be able to pay without going bankrupt, even as of now, there are several really big casinos that still have a winning limit set for their players, which i believe most gamblers dont even know.