Pages:
Author

Topic: Blockchain.info adds ether (Read 968 times)

legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1483
August 27, 2017, 12:09:47 AM
#24
Blockchain.info will be adding BCH too but on a limited scale starting at the end of the year according to their blog. Maybe next time they will start adding other proven cryptocurrencies too like LTC.

I think this is the direction they are heading in. Like Coinbase and Bitstamp, they realized that gaining a foothold in the altcoin markets during this early stage is simply too important to neglect. Like Bitcoin, the time-tested and liquid coins like ETH and LTC will be sticking around for a long time. So, I imagine that this ETH rollout has been many months in the making.

It makes sense from that perspective that it would take months for them to roll out BCH, too. At their scale, supporting a major coin is no small endeavor. In time, I'm sure they'll be one of the go-to web wallets for LTC as well.

but there is still a huge difference!
services like coinbase are not just wallets, they are like banks. you give up control over your funds and they can use it as they like. for example they can use the bitcoin you deposit to trade themselves on other markets (just like a bank).

also they offer other stuff such as trading these altcoins which they make money from the fees.

blockchain.info doesn't do any of these!
they don't control the private keys so they don't have access to the funds you deposit.
they don't get any fees either for the services they provide.

this rises the question: what is the foothold they are trying to gain?

blockchain.info does offer "trading" in a sense. you can buy and sell BTC (and now it seems ETH as well) through their wallet.

they may not control your private keys, but that doesn't mean using them as a wallet is secure. you don't control the software pushing your transactions, which means you could lose coins in MITM attacks. you are trusting that the service isn't compromised.

the foothold they are trying to gain is market share for wallet usage, which translates to industry relevance. you can see that they are transitioning into the consulting space in an attempt to capitalize on this:

Thanks to our market dominance and our wealth of experience with mass deployment, Blockchain is bringing the value of distributed-ledger technology to bear for leading global institutions.

Just as we've done for millions of individuals with our personal wallet, Blockchain empowers global institutions with the same control, security and ease of use—and fundamentally changes the way they do business.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1293
There is trouble abrewing
August 26, 2017, 11:07:02 PM
#23
Blockchain.info will be adding BCH too but on a limited scale starting at the end of the year according to their blog. Maybe next time they will start adding other proven cryptocurrencies too like LTC.

I think this is the direction they are heading in. Like Coinbase and Bitstamp, they realized that gaining a foothold in the altcoin markets during this early stage is simply too important to neglect. Like Bitcoin, the time-tested and liquid coins like ETH and LTC will be sticking around for a long time. So, I imagine that this ETH rollout has been many months in the making.

It makes sense from that perspective that it would take months for them to roll out BCH, too. At their scale, supporting a major coin is no small endeavor. In time, I'm sure they'll be one of the go-to web wallets for LTC as well.

but there is still a huge difference!
services like coinbase are not just wallets, they are like banks. you give up control over your funds and they can use it as they like. for example they can use the bitcoin you deposit to trade themselves on other markets (just like a bank).

also they offer other stuff such as trading these altcoins which they make money from the fees.

blockchain.info doesn't do any of these!
they don't control the private keys so they don't have access to the funds you deposit.
they don't get any fees either for the services they provide.

this rises the question: what is the foothold they are trying to gain?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508
August 26, 2017, 08:29:55 PM
#22
Blockchain.info will be adding BCH too but on a limited scale starting at the end of the year according to their blog. Maybe next time they will start adding other proven cryptocurrencies too like LTC.

I think this is the direction they are heading in. Like Coinbase and Bitstamp, they realized that gaining a foothold in the altcoin markets during this early stage is simply too important to neglect. Like Bitcoin, the time-tested and liquid coins like ETH and LTC will be sticking around for a long time. So, I imagine that this ETH rollout has been many months in the making.

It makes sense from that perspective that it would take months for them to roll out BCH, too. At their scale, supporting a major coin is no small endeavor. In time, I'm sure they'll be one of the go-to web wallets for LTC as well.
sr. member
Activity: 868
Merit: 259
August 26, 2017, 05:18:35 AM
#21
Blockchain.info will be adding BCH too but on a limited scale starting at the end of the year according to their blog. Maybe next time they will start adding other proven cryptocurrencies too like LTC.
hero member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 500
August 25, 2017, 02:14:06 AM
#20
Blockchain wallet adds ether as a new currency and a build-in exchange BTC to ETH

https://blog.blockchain.com/2017/08/17/blockchain-wallet-adds-ether/

Wow you would think thy would have added bitcoin cash first since isn't blockchain.info's main shareholder roger ver? Or maybe even remove the original bitcoin and swap to Bcash right.  Anyway dont keep any large amount of coins on there due to stories of the past of people getting hacked.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
August 22, 2017, 03:23:45 PM
#19
Actually getting curious after reading the news. I think Ethereum deserved it, as one of the most growing second digital asset after Bitcoin. The market cap gradually increasing. It gives more important, waiting that moment.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
August 20, 2017, 04:16:08 PM
#18
Blockchain.info has ALSO raised their BTC sending fees like CRAZY... here's the message I got when trying to send my balance today (about .5 btc)

This is an oversized bitcoin transaction!

Your wallet needs to consolidate many smaller payments you've received in the past. This requires a relatively high fee in order to be confirmed quickly.
8.2x
The Normal Size
$41.62
Recommended Fee
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508
August 20, 2017, 03:40:25 PM
#17
Well, that was unexpected, since Blockchain supported only the traditional Bitcoin and not popular altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) even Bitcoin Cash were not supported after fork.
You are right its a little bit surprising for Blockchain to addup Ether coin into their service knowing that Bitcoin would be the pure coin that they do support and now they do make such changes which is really a shocking thing for me considering that there are already lots of Ether wallets out there but well its better to have many options on choosing a wallet which do support ETH. Having many options is always better.

It's really not surprising. This is the direction we have been heading for a while. Bitfinex, Bitstamp and Coinbase (i.e. the major exchanges) all added Ethereum despite being very Bitcoin-oriented at the time, and despite the risks of diluting their respective market shares. They realized that the ETH market was simply too big to ignore.

The same goes for Blockchain.info. A few years ago, it made sense for a company in their position to focus solely on Bitcoin. With the altcoin and digital token markets continuing to flourish, they can make a relatively minimal investment (vs. their company size and operating funds) to get a big piece of market share during this early adoption phase.
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 687
August 20, 2017, 10:18:46 AM
#16
Well, that was unexpected, since Blockchain supported only the traditional Bitcoin and not popular altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) even Bitcoin Cash were not supported after fork.
You are right its a little bit surprising for Blockchain to addup Ether coin into their service knowing that Bitcoin would be the pure coin that they do support and now they do make such changes which is really a shocking thing for me considering that there are already lots of Ether wallets out there but well its better to have many options on choosing a wallet which do support ETH. Having many options is always better.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
August 20, 2017, 06:58:54 AM
#15
butwhy they didnt support bcc ? at least allow us to claim our free bcc  instead some of tutorials here that harm us and not work !! 
I think they will announce something on this regards soon because as they don't have access to any bitcoin or private key information of their users they can't claim those BCC for their benefit. So there is no point for them to not allow their users to claim those free BCC they deserves.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508
August 20, 2017, 12:52:40 AM
#14
but why they didnt support bcc ? at least allow us to claim our free bcc  instead some of tutorials here that harm us and not work !! 

I'm guessing they didn't support it for the same reason that Coinbase didn't. The fork was rushed and they didn't have time to roll out a well-tested update in time for the fork. More than that, they have never supported altcoins, so it wasn't expected that they would necessarily support Bitcoin Cash. Just extract your private keys; it's easy enough. I'm pretty sure BTC.com has a wallet for Bitcoin Cash.

I imagine that the ETH update has been in the works for several months now.
hero member
Activity: 696
Merit: 500
August 19, 2017, 11:13:29 PM
#13
yup its true they blockchain.info added ether



and ability to change your bitcoin to ether or vice versa



butwhy they didnt support bcc ? at least allow us to claim our free bcc  instead some of tutorials here that harm us and not work !! 
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 508
August 19, 2017, 04:06:22 PM
#12
Not a big news at all i was a fan of blockchain when they allowed me to send multiple payments but as fees increased they wanted to make more money and removed the most important feature. As of eth it's no big news they won't allow us to send to contracts and storing online is still a risk it's better if we use myetherwallet it is easy viewer and it is more secure than other eth wallets.

I hated when they removed their legacy wallet option. They removed the ability to do custom spends (choosing your inputs), at least from imported private keys, making privacy much worse for their customers. I stopped using their wallet entirely after this.

They don't provide full Ethereum functionality here so indeed, MyEtherWallet is a better option. I wouldn't consider using Blockchain.info "storing online" since your private keys aren't exposed to them. Sending transactions can be significantly less safe than with desktop wallets, though, because of the risk of MITM attacks. The key security issue with Blockchain.info is that you don't control the software, even if you control the private keys.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
August 19, 2017, 02:51:30 PM
#11
Not a big news at all i was a fan of blockchain when they allowed me to send multiple payments but as fees increased they wanted to make more money and removed the most important feature. As of eth it's no big news they won't allow us to send to contracts and storing online is still a risk it's better if we use myetherwallet it is easy viewer and it is more secure than other eth wallets.
hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 636
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
August 19, 2017, 05:45:32 AM
#10
There should be a statement too if they are able to support token's or other altcoins.

Those coins that are supported by ETH.

They should start to add BCH as I think they are now trying to focus now with only famous coins.
legendary
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1020
August 18, 2017, 05:29:57 PM
#9
Well, that was unexpected, since Blockchain supported only the traditional Bitcoin and not popular altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) even Bitcoin Cash were not supported after fork.
Litecoin doesn't offer anything more than bitcoin but ethereum is completely new tech with lots of future potential. They might never add bitcoincash.
Basicly, it allows only to receive and send Ether. Yes, Ethereum is a popular coin and has potential but Blockchain does not offer the features as MyEtherWallet has.

Well, that was unexpected, since Blockchain supported only the traditional Bitcoin and not popular altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) even Bitcoin Cash were not supported after fork.
It can't be that unexpected since Blockchain has to deal with share holders that are purely out to realize growth, which is exactly why they will continue to add more altcoins in the coming years.

Other popular online wallet services support various digital assets, so from a business perspective, the move from blockchain.info to support Ether is very lucrative and will likely gain them thousands of new users quickly.

Crypto in general has experienced an explosive level of growth, and the interest and attention has also flown big time into the altcoin industry ~ from there we can expect blockchain.info to support more altcoins in the future.
Am agree with your post but Blockchain.info is with this feature on the same level with Coinbase. Allowing to receive and send tokens as MyEtherWallet offers, is missing that would be a great option.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179
August 18, 2017, 05:16:27 PM
#8
Well, that was unexpected, since Blockchain supported only the traditional Bitcoin and not popular altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) even Bitcoin Cash were not supported after fork.
It can't be that unexpected since Blockchain has to deal with share holders that are purely out to realize growth, which is exactly why they will continue to add more altcoins in the coming years.

Other popular online wallet services support various digital assets, so from a business perspective, the move from blockchain.info to support Ether is very lucrative and will likely gain them thousands of new users quickly.

Crypto in general has experienced an explosive level of growth, and the interest and attention has also flown big time into the altcoin industry ~ from there we can expect blockchain.info to support more altcoins in the future.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1398
For support ➡️ help.bc.game
August 18, 2017, 04:03:07 PM
#7
... But anyhow, users must not used any web wallet as receiving address for ETH contract tokens.

I have read some comments about bad points of MyEtherWallet. What then would the best practice to have receiving address for ether token? Really.

What like bad points? Can you point it out and let's discussed it.

There are some safety measures to make sure our MEW addresses won't be compromised. Still it's way better to used MEW as priority when receiving ether tokens. Surely in the future there will be other platforms who will have that feature but for now, it's wise to stick with MEW.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1006
August 18, 2017, 02:44:00 PM
#6
... But anyhow, users must not used any web wallet as receiving address for ETH contract tokens.

I have read some comments about bad points of MyEtherWallet. What then would the best practice to have receiving address for ether token? Really.
You don't have to worry when using myetherwallet but don't forget to check the URL and SSL information on address bar before uploading Keystore file or entering private key.

Don't save your private key or mnemonic phrase anywhere online or in your computer, just save keystore file encrypted with very strong and unique password.


Well, that was unexpected, since Blockchain supported only the traditional Bitcoin and not popular altcoins (e.g. Litecoin) even Bitcoin Cash were not supported after fork.
Litecoin doesn't offer anything more than bitcoin but ethereum is completely new tech with lots of future potential. They might never add bitcoincash.
full member
Activity: 152
Merit: 100
August 18, 2017, 01:41:06 PM
#5
... But anyhow, users must not used any web wallet as receiving address for ETH contract tokens.

I have read some comments about bad points of MyEtherWallet. What then would the best practice to have receiving address for ether token? Really.
Pages:
Jump to: