why is dan not willing to answwer them.
Dan openly answer some of the questions here please:
1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!)
2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did)
3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent)
4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this?
5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no is suffice it just answers)
6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with)
7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one?
8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all)
I've answered all of these questions already, go back and research the information for yourself
No you have not. You have been evasive please just answer them in a cohesive manner. By not doing so again is extremely evasive!
Believe it or not i want to put and end to this and you are just enabling it to carry on and is highly suspicious
Actually, Dan Metcalf has answered all those questions... a number of times. And given different and opposite answers in several of those occasions, including once, LIVE, on IRC in which he made patently evident he's GUILTY AS SIN. There's nothing "suspicious" about Dan Metcalf and his dealings with Prometheus: He was, as stated, in his pockets and acting on his commands for the purpose of scamming. End of the story.
Anyone even thinking of touching anything Dan Metcalf does, fully deserves what no doubt is coming to him. In spades.