I care. I care what the governance team of Bitcoin is. I care about who is standing behind it.
With Blockstream/Core I see Big Name Tech Insiders. I see dirty tricks, bad morals, untrustworthiness, scattered mini-centralization in chains, and total loss of privacy.
With Classic I see Big Name Tech Insiders, Small Banks, Large Banks, Independent Companies, and Mainstream Users in General. I see sound decision making, unselfish and flexible paths, widespread de-centralization, and increased individual privacy protections.
So yes, I care, and I think it is important for everyone to see the facts of what is going on beyond the smoke and mirrors lying FUD illusion that Blockstream/Core is trying to paint.
You bring up a good point... there are many banks and all competing with each other.
But some people here seem to have listened to one too many Alex Jones shows
(nothing against AJ, he's great)...and somehow think that the illuminati or
the bilderbergs or the bohemian club or whatever is in complete control
of all the "banksters" and the banks as a collective are conspiring to
take over bitcoin by pushing for bigger blocks so that it
becomes more 'centralized'... its the most ridiculous idea.
But yes, people are really saying stuff like "Hearn is a Bankster Shill"
... so deluded.
If the elite/deepstate/powers-that-be really do have as
much power as some people think, and if they were really
out to stop bitcion, there would be much
more effective things they would be doing.