I am selling my license. As I am lacking an assistant who does all that fancy finance stuff for me, this program is earning me 0 (zero) btc.
I checked how many times you asked here, and found never before!
It seems therefore that you could really need somebody who can serve you, read your mind, and maybe change your diapers too.
Try playing lottery, its easier to understand.
Hey, I didn't lose anything either except the costs for my electricity.
Anyway... I didn't know what to ask for. And reading through 125 Pages? Who has the time?
You found now the time to write something.
Why would you need to read through 125 pages? it says very clear you should read the manual. Is that too much?
Start here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5590896If you have problems to understand this, then ask specific. We are all glad to help. In the 125 pages it was said several times, that C.A.T. is a TOOL, not an ATM. You must know what you want to achieve. You need to watch the exchange(s) if that is possible. E.g. if you want to trade x/y then this trading pair must be on the exchange obviously, but if there are no trades at all, then your outcome is naturally zero.
You need to understand that C.A.T. is a Ping-Pong trading to achieve the gain of 0.6% or whatever you have set. If the coin value is permanently falling, then never a pong will happen and you will gradually lose all.
As some member made it clear to me, you will need to use some pairs that do have trades, they do have ups and downs and so it will happen.
If you want a predictable trading tool, then you might want Butterbot, which only trades with BTC, but it remembers the past and calculates a possible future with EMAxx - but that is not C.A.T.
Don't be fooled with the possibility of trading. Like when I looked at Etherium once: Every 40 second a trade, every 80 seconds a gain of 0.6%, .... you will be rich in a month!
Get a cup of coffee (or beer) and think what you want, how that could be achieved and set your C.A.T. accordingly. Watch it to see if YOUR prediction is correct. Change if it doesn't.