Topic: 【BOT】 🌟 C.A.T. Cryptocurrency Automatic Trader 🌟 (New Price List 04/2021) - page 98. (Read 531514 times)

as i can see these are micro trades over pong (less than 50 sat).
due to some rounding routines when values are so little there's the risk that some calculation are not exactly correct.

   Update ping-pong parameters in Mode to a higher % and set stop loss.

What am I doing wrong? I get too often Total Gain minus!!!

I always add the following into the request header of my API calls which seems to do the trick - didn't try with c-cex yet though...

well actually it seems that exchange is considering CAT a browser.
But i don't know how to solve this. I tried to remove the "Agent" attribute in my call, but result is worst.
I think this thing need a fix on exchange side.....

it depends by the API you wants to get.
Pm me with the list of API 

How much does the bot cost?

Added this info in "TIPS & TRICKS SECTION"

Why sometimes i run out of money while i started with enough balance?

Any exchange have rules like : decimal numbers for Price/Qty, Min Qty, Min Total Order (Qty x Price).
These constraints create problems : you can't create micro orders or you can't create a PONG starting from a micro trade.
Then you have 3 choise :
- let CAT Round these values to reach the min amount (round is made over qty)
- deny any rounding routine (micro trades & partially filled orders with micro qty will remain frozen)
- use DUST Options (to discard trades/partially filled orders).

You can also combine these options : you can discard micro partially filled orders and adequate trades.

So how this impact on my balance?
Let's make 2 example, on BTC/LTC Market

Example 1 :

My Balance is 1 BTC, 0 LTC on start
- I Create 1 PING BUY 100@Y
- A micro trade occurs BUY 0.1@Y
- Exchange wants at least 1 unit as QTY
- C.A.T. try to create SELL 0.1@Y+% but this is not possible
  - CASE A : Adequate is TRUE -> 0.1 is adequate to 1 and SELL ORDER IS SELL 1@Y+%
  - CASE B : Adequate is FALSE -> TRADE IS FROZEN FOREVER
 
BUT in case A you will have another error : NO LTC Available, in fact the 0.9 LTC needed for roudings from 0.1 to 1

Example 2 : (Very uncommon, but useful to explain)

- You have an active order on MarketA and a Trade On MarketB.
- The sum of order + trade represent 100% Of Your Balance.
- NO Adequate option is set and Trade On MarketB doesn't have ADEQUATE Option active
- Trade is Frozen and No Pong is Possible.
- Order is Recalculated on MarketA
- C.A.T. Delete the order befor recreation
- Balance returns available between delete and create routine
- During that moment CAT is able to create the PONG Order on MarketB (adequate is false, but balance is available)
- C.A.T. is not able to recreate the PING On marketA because balance was used by PONG Creation on MarketB

Suggestions :
- Take a look at adequate options and understand how it works this precise options group
- The adequate option for "PING Creation from pool" is more risky than other adequate options.
- Avoid to trade with 100% of your balance (there are options to consider for example 80% of your full balance)
- Before start trading on / market it could be a good idea to have non 0 Balance in one of the 2 sides
- Use DUST Options
- Deal with the fact that sometimes a frozen situation could happens : you can delete order/trades manually or create a new order.

yes, stop loss type it's about a precise order type
Sell ALL For sell Orders
Buy ALL for Buy Orders

Hi Sampey.
Just a question on "pong stop loss".

Does BUY ALL rules only be evaluated on PONG BUY orders (and the SELL ALL for PONG SELL orders)? Or the rule is evaluated both for pong buy and sell?

Thank you. I really appreciate your support.

about limits :

If A Rule is matched
A - If Adequate is TRUE then price is set to the limit and limit algorithm end
B - If Adequate is FALSE order recalculation/calculation is aborted.

So it's an OR check and when first limit is matched algorithm ends.

So, probably sequence in your case is important.

Hi Sampey.
I was looking at price limit feature and I have a few questions.
Does an "adequate" limit rule supersedes a "vanilla" limit rule (are the rules processed as AND or as OR)?
Last: is the rule sequence important for an order to be created?
Thank you so much.

yes, exactly.

i sale C.A.T for someone then PM you for API public key change  ?

So you suggest to run one instance per trade? Seems like a lot of setup overhead. I was hoping somehow I could set the pool up so that there were somehow some staggered orders,  but everything I try seems to eventually clump them back together at the same price again - and the only way to fix it is to change the orders back to static.

Sounds great - I'll certainly help out once I've work out what I'm doing =) still very much learning what CAT can and can't do

i think the easier solution is to run more than 1 algorithm on the same market.
On any algorithm you will set different price limits/conditions.

Hi,
I have been discussing this exact thing with Sampey and I am in the process of setting up a separate website/forum at http://cryptowalk.com/ to hopefully discuss CAT strategies, trading plans, trading results etc with other CAT users.

The intent is to allow public and private listings and allow users to choose whether to keep their content to themselves or share within the public forum area for us all to view and contribute as well as discuss how we can use new features in our trading plans to improve on already great results. (assume we all have trading plans right?

I still need to Announce/encourage participation from other CAT users but the site is setup enough to start using it if that will help sharing this type of information.

Happy to share my progress and feedback on CAT so far but i am sure their are lifetime users online that can contribute more.

Regards Steve

Hi Sampey,

I've been playing around with the settings - and have managed to get my orders split (say 2 units per order), but I tend to end up with all orders set to the same price, for example 10 orders of 2 units all at price 0.00200000. Is there a way I can get cat to (dynamically) organise these orders into different prices changed by a percentage or fixed amount

e.g.

Order Id	Current Values in CAT	Desired Values in CAT
1	PING BUY [email protected] (Dynamic)	PING BUY [email protected] (Dynamic)
2	PING BUY [email protected] (Dynamic)	PING BUY [email protected] (Dynamic)
3	PING BUY [email protected] (Dynamic)	PING BUY [email protected] (Dynamic)

I can do this with static values fine - but would like the pool to set this up on its own based on market conditions, is this possible?
Thanks =)

EDIT: I have the following rules

Hi, you can create a topic in marketplace section.
Thanks.